Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.33
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rekayasa Sipil Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil IJIEEB : International Journal of Integrated Education, Engineering and Business Proceeding of World Conference Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education Wasana Nyata Jurnal Pengabdian West Science WASANA NYATA
Lutfiansyah, Yopi
Faculty Of Engineering, University Mercu Buana Jakarta, Indonesia
Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : journal of applied science engineering technology and education

 1 
Comparative Analysis Method of Work, Time and Cost of Concrete Spun Pile Work with Bored Pile On Construction of the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Lutfiansyah, Yopi; Akhsan, Muhammad
Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (514.312 KB) | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.asci1137

Abstract

Building construction consists of two parts, namely the upper building and lower building. The upper building transmits forces to the lower building, which then from the lower building is channeled to the supporting soil. Pile foundation is a part of the lower structure that is used to receive and distribute the load from the upper structure to the supporting soil which is located at a certain depth determined by the results of the soil investigation. Piles are used as building foundations if the soil under the building base does not have enough bearing capacity to carry the weight of the building working on it. The stake used in this comparison is the Concrete Spun Pile and Bored Pile foundation. The results of the study show that the Bored pile method is slightly more complicated than the Concrete spun pile method. In terms of time required for the Concrete spun work is 6 hours, while for Bored piles per point is 9 hours assuming the work is 3 months In terms of the cost of foundation work of 1000mm diameter and 30m depth using the Concrete spun pile method is Rp. 13,704,241,634.10 for 156 points. whereas for the Bored pile method with a diameter of 1200mm and a depth of 30m is Rp. 14,242,797,932.85 for 78 points. So the foundation work with the Concrete spun pile method is more effective and efficient than the Bored pile method based on the method of implementation, time and cost.
Cost comparison analysis of slab structure using concrete beam and steel beam Lutfiansyah, Yopi; Tanjung, Galen
Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (649.928 KB) | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.asci2262

Abstract

Cost planning is an important phase on construction project planning to give illustration to the owner how much cost they should spend to execute that project. The slab is an element of the structure that has a large amount of the quantity so that affects the cost of the whole project. Then the cost comparison of slab structure has to be analyzed to know the most optimum design between conventional shuttering with the concrete beam on the initial design, first alternative options design, and metal deck shuttering with steel beam on second alternative design. The calculation of the slab structure cost analysis were based on Indonesia’s standard (PermenPUPR and SNI). The result is the first alternative options design that using concrete beam were cheaper 10,24% than the initial design that using concrete beam too while the second alternative options design that using steel beam were more expensive 27,14% than the initial design.
Comparative Analysis Method of Work, Time and Cost of Concrete Spun Pile Work with Bored Pile On Construction of the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Yopi Lutfiansyah; Muhammad Akhsan
Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (514.312 KB) | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.asci1137

Abstract

Building construction consists of two parts, namely the upper building and lower building. The upper building transmits forces to the lower building, which then from the lower building is channeled to the supporting soil. Pile foundation is a part of the lower structure that is used to receive and distribute the load from the upper structure to the supporting soil which is located at a certain depth determined by the results of the soil investigation. Piles are used as building foundations if the soil under the building base does not have enough bearing capacity to carry the weight of the building working on it. The stake used in this comparison is the Concrete Spun Pile and Bored Pile foundation. The results of the study show that the Bored pile method is slightly more complicated than the Concrete spun pile method. In terms of time required for the Concrete spun work is 6 hours, while for Bored piles per point is 9 hours assuming the work is 3 months In terms of the cost of foundation work of 1000mm diameter and 30m depth using the Concrete spun pile method is Rp. 13,704,241,634.10 for 156 points. whereas for the Bored pile method with a diameter of 1200mm and a depth of 30m is Rp. 14,242,797,932.85 for 78 points. So the foundation work with the Concrete spun pile method is more effective and efficient than the Bored pile method based on the method of implementation, time and cost.
Cost comparison analysis of slab structure using concrete beam and steel beam Yopi Lutfiansyah; Galen Tanjung
Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (649.928 KB) | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.asci2262

Abstract

Cost planning is an important phase on construction project planning to give illustration to the owner how much cost they should spend to execute that project. The slab is an element of the structure that has a large amount of the quantity so that affects the cost of the whole project. Then the cost comparison of slab structure has to be analyzed to know the most optimum design between conventional shuttering with the concrete beam on the initial design, first alternative options design, and metal deck shuttering with steel beam on second alternative design. The calculation of the slab structure cost analysis were based on Indonesia’s standard (PermenPUPR and SNI). The result is the first alternative options design that using concrete beam were cheaper 10,24% than the initial design that using concrete beam too while the second alternative options design that using steel beam were more expensive 27,14% than the initial design.
Co-Authors Agus Supiyat Aji Tri Setiadi Akhsan, Muhammad Darma, Edifrizal Egar Albert Elhazri Hasdian Fertilia, novika Galen Tanjung Hamonangan Girsang Imbuh Rochmad Irriene Indah Susanti Isma Shofa Mufida Mirnayani, Mirnayani Muhammad Akhsan Noviawati Puspita Novika Candra F Novika Candra Fertili Novika Candra Fertilia Refianda Eki Putra Resi Aseanto Stefanus, Stefanus Tanjung, Galen Tri Wahidi Wilhelmus Tarigan Yunita Dian Suwandari