Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Cardiology Heart Science Journal Narra J
Pranata, Raymond
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Heart Science Journal

 1 
Long term radial artery occlusion following distal or proximal transradial artery access in invasive cardiovascular procedures Saboe, Aninka; Ibrahim, Maulana; Pranata, Raymond; Dewi, Triwedya Indra; Yahya, Achmad Fauzi
Heart Science Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): The Complexity in the Management of Heart Rhythm Disorder
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.hsj.2025.006.02.10

Abstract

Background: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is one of the most common consequences of transradial artery access (TRA) in invasive cardiovascular procedures; therefore, alternative approaches, such as distal radial artery access (DRA), emerged. This study compares proximal and distal radial access for long-term RAO. Objectives: This study compares long-term RAO incidence with proximal and distal radial access following invasive cardiovascular procedures. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. The subjects comprised patients with heart disease who underwent invasive cardiovascular procedures using radial access at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung between July 2017 and December 2020. The patients were categorized into two groups based on their access type: proximal and distal. The incidence of long-term RAO was evaluated through Doppler ultrasound at least one-year post-TRA. Results: The study included 107 patients (proximal = 72 patients; distal = 35 patients). The mean age was 58.2 ± 8.26 years, with a predominance of male patients (79.4%) and smokers (65.4%). The majority of procedures were interventional (58.2%). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for selecting the access side, which was more prevalent on the left side in the distal group. Long-term RAO occurred in 8 patients (7.48%), with 7 cases (9.72%) in the proximal group and 1 case (2.86%) in the distal group (p=0.269). Conclusion: The study findings reveal no significant difference in the incidence of long-term RAO between proximal and distal radial access in invasive cardiovascular procedures.
Right ventricular function preservation in conduction system pacing (CSP): Impact of lead-to tricuspid annulus distance left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) vs. his-bundle pacing (HBP) Mirza, Try Ahmad; Pranata, Raymond; Kamarullah, William; Iqbal, Mohammad; Hidayat, Syarief; Achmad, Chaerul; Karwiky, Giky
Heart Science Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Accelerating Clinical Breakthroughs: The Journey from Molecular Discovery to Pa
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.hsj.2026.007.01.15

Abstract

Background: Pacemaker remains the most effective therapy for the management of conduction disorders; however, traditional methods of right ventricular (RV) pacing have given way to more advanced conduction system pacing (CSP) techniques, such as His Bundle Pacing (HBP) and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP). Objective: The impact of these two techniques on RV function is the objective of this study. Methods: This longitudinal prospective cohort study investigates differences in RV function among patients who have undergone HBP and those who have received LBBAP, using the echocardiographic parameters: fractional area change (FAC), RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and the progression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), with a focus on lead placement distance to the tricuspid annulus (TA) within LBBAP subgroup. Result: Among the 64 patients (33 in the HBP group and 31 in the LBBAP group), LBBAP patients with a lead-to-TA distance > 21.5 mm showed significantly better preservation of RV function across all metrics compared to HBP, specifically noted in TAPSE (1.83±5.34 vs. -1.06±3.77 in HBP, p=0.048), FAC (7.83±9.98 vs. 2.42±10.63 in HBP, p=0.011), and also RVGLS improvement (p=0.020). Conclusion: LBBAP with lead placement > 21.5 mm from the TA better preserves RV function compared to HBP mainly by minimizing mechanical interference with the tricuspid valve and reducing TR risk.
Co-Authors Achmad Fauzi Yahya, Achmad Fauzi Aulia, Mohammad Sidqi Chaerul Achmad Dewi, Triwedya Indra Ian Huang Ibrahim, Maulana Kamarullah, William Karwiky, Giky Kusumawardhani, Nuraini Yasmin Lukito, Antonia A. Mirza, Try Ahmad Mohammad Iqbal Pramudyo, Miftah Pratama, Fahmi Bagus Putra, Iwan Cahyo Santosa Saboe, Aninka Syarief Hidayat