Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Filsafat Nusantara Pascakiamat Mahaswa, Rangga Kala; Prayuda, Gloria Bayu Nusa
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol 13, No 2 (2025): Cultural Studies After the End of the World
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ret.v13i2.13429

Abstract

The development of Nusantara Philosophy (Filsafat Nusantara) is inextricably linked to the politics of knowledge (philosophy) in Indonesia. Hitherto, Nusantara Philosophy has remained anchored in historical romanticism concerning the trajectory of philosophical thought in Indonesia. On the other hand, the paucity of futurist philosophical models or end-of-world philosophical approaches (apocalypse/post-apocalypse) in Indonesia poses a distinct challenge to the advancement of Nusantara Philosophy, particularly when addressing its own future. At this juncture, Nusantara Philosophy remains incomplete with itself, ensnared in issues of glorification, romanticism, uncertainty, and ambiguity surrounding its disparate, undirected concepts. Accordingly, this article illuminates several problems within Nusantara Philosophy through the lenses of archipelagic philosophical studies and speculative realism, to further elucidate the philosophical projections of Nusantara Philosophy when interrogating the Apocalypse. Certain analyses of Nusantara Philosophy merely catalog local knowledge, employing an approach inseparable from the cosmological-archipelagic model, wherein seas, mountains, and island expanses are envisioned as metaphysical agents serving as mediating mediums. Similarly, Nusantara Philosophy frequently generates diverse forms of speculative ethics that invariably compel consideration of specific moral values and cultural norms. Rather than seeking to transcend the universal claims of Western philosophy regarding apocalyptic/post-apocalyptic concepts, Nusantara Philosophy tacitly harbors a Ratu Adil (Just King) perspective to explicate the hyperobject of the end times.
DE-ANTROPOSENTRISME PANCASILA: SEBUAH RISET AWAL FILSAFAT Rangga Kala Mahaswa
Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan 2021: VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2021
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52738/pjk.v1i1.10

Abstract

Satu tahun terakhir, masyarakat Indonesia telah menyadari secara tidak langsung arti daripentingnya kesehatan publik karena ancaman pandemi global Covid-19. Wacana tentang virus,satu eksistensi non-manusia yang tidak kasat mata tetapi memiliki dampak yang signifikanterhadap perubahan sosial-budaya masyarakat. Dunia seolah berhenti sebab telah memberikanjarak terhadap sesama perihal munculnya ancaman yang tidak pernah terpikirkan sebelumnya.Ironisnya, ancaman yang setiap hari kita hadapi seringkali terabaikan, yaitu ancaman kerusakanekologis di epos Antroposen. Krisis Antroposen meliputi perubahan iklim dan pemanasan globalyang berdampak secara langsung terhadap wilayah regional maupun lokal dan ragam spesies diIndonesia. Lantas, bagaimana posisi pemahaman onto-epistemologis Pancasila terhadap ekistensinon-manusia seperti halnya lingkungan atau multi-spesies lainnya? Sebagai artikel gagasankonseptual, penelitian ini akan menganalisis secara filosofis bahwa kriteria onto-epistemologisPancasila masih didominasi oleh pandangan Antroposentrisme atau manusia pusat segalanya sehingga perlu adanya tinjauan kritis terhadapnya. Adapun beberapa poin strategi yang tawarkanantara lain: Pertama, pendekatan de-antroposentrisme Pancasila diperlukan sebagai wacanaalternatif untuk merekognisi eksistensi non-manusia. Kedua, rekognisi tidak cukup tetapidibutuhkan afirmasi terhadap kondisi riil ekologis tanpa tergantung pada romantisisme Pancasila.Ketiga, perluasan pendidikan Pancasila terhadap masalah ekologis kontemporer dan tidak hanyasekedar menjadi menjadi ‘jargon’ identitas bangsa. Keempat, perlu adanya gerakan perubahanlingkungan untuk menguatkan kembali bahwa Pancasila dapat menjawab persoalan ekologisbangsa dan negara. Dengan demikian, artikel konseptual ini kemudian menjadi dasar bahwa di“Bumi” manakah Pancasila akan mengada jika bumi pertiwinya saja tidak dapat dihuni(unhabitable) oleh manusia Indonesia.
What's 'Wisdom' in Local Wisdom Imaginaries on Indigenous Research? Rangga Kala Mahaswa; Hardiyanti Hardiyanti
Indigenous Southeast Asian and Ethnic Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32678/iseaes.v1i2.23

Abstract

The abundance of studies on local wisdom in Indonesia is evident from a Google Scholar search, which yields a wealth of resources. However, the concept of local wisdom and its distinction from related terms such as ‘local knowledge’ and ‘indigenous knowledge’ remains unclear. This article seeks to clarify the notion of ‘wisdom’ by: first, re-examining  the definitions and debates surrounding local wisdom, local knowledge, and indigenous knowledge; second, tracing the models of indigenous research conducted in Indonesia; third, formulating a critical and philosophical approach to interpreting wisdom as conceptualised in Indonesian academic studies; and fourth, critically reflecting on the discourse of local knowledge, highlighting its role not only as a concept but also as a practical social movement that amplifies local voices.