Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : MAQASIDI

Tingkat Kepatuhan Masyarakat Aceh Terhadap Surat Edaran Penjabat Gubernur Aceh Nomor 451/11286 Fatahillah, Zahrul
MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 3, No. 2 (Desember 2023)
Publisher : MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum published by the Islamic Criminal Law Program of the Sharia and Islamic Economics Department at the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/maqasidi.v3i2.2239

Abstract

Belakangan ini di Aceh sedang marak terjadi pelanggaran Syari’at Islam, kejadian tersebut termasuk di warung kopi dan café sehingga Penjabat Gubernur Aceh mengeluarkan Surat Edaran Nomor 451/11286 untuk memerintahkan pemilik usaha warung kopi dan café menutup tempat usahanya pada pukul 24:00 WIB. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mencari tahu tingkat kepatuhan masyarakat Aceh terhadap Surat Edaran Penjabat Gubernur Aceh Nomor 451/11286. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris untuk mencari tahu praktik hukum di masyarkat. penulis menemukan bahwa mayoritas masyarakat Aceh sudah memiliki kesadaran hukum ditandai dengan kepatuhan mereka terhadap Surat Edaran tersebut atas dasar keyakinannya sendiri. Namun juga masih banyak ditemui dari pelaku usaha yang mentaati aturan karena takut akan sanksi hukum yang akan mengancamnya, ini artinya kesadaran hukum pelaku usaha masih rendah. Penulis dapat memberi saran kepada Pemerintah Aceh agar dalam perumusan aturan hukum seharusnya melibatkan segala unsur masyarakat sehingga produk hukum menjadi konsensus bersama antara pemerintah dan unsur masyarakat dan dapat diterima dengan baik dalam masyarakat, kemudian untuk masyarakat agar membantu pemerintah untuk menyukseskan pelaksanaan syari’at Islam di Aceh.
Normative Disharmony Regarding the Duration of Marital Conflict in Divorce Law and Its Impact on the Protection of Women Zahrul Fatahillah; Muhajir, Muhammad; Hasanah, Uswatun
MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 5, No. 2 (Desember 2025)
Publisher : MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum published by the Islamic Criminal Law Program of the Sharia and Islamic Economics Department at the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/maqasidi.v5i2.5878

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the normative disharmony regarding the time limit of disputes and quarrels as grounds for divorce within the Indonesian legal system, specifically between Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2022. The inconsistency among these three regulations gives rise to practical issues in judicial proceedings, particularly in ensuring effective legal protection for women. Both the Government Regulation and the KHI do not stipulate a minimum duration of conflict as a requirement for divorce, whereas the SEMA explicitly requires that the dispute must have lasted for at least six months. This provision potentially obstructs women’s access to justice, especially in cases involving unhealthy or violent domestic circumstances. Employing a normative legal research method through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the time limit regulation in the SEMA is not aligned with the provisions set forth in the Government Regulation and the KHI. The norms within the SEMA are deemed insufficiently responsive to the legal needs of women, thereby necessitating regulatory harmonization to establish a just, adaptive legal system that guarantees equal protection in divorce cases. SEMA Number 1 of 2022 sets a six-month dispute requirement for divorce. This norm restricts judicial discretion and impedes legal protection for women, particularly victims of domestic violence. From a juridical perspective, the SEMA also exceeds its authority by regulating substantive matters without formal legislative processes. Consequently, substantive justice and human rights are at risk of being neglected. An urgent evaluation of this provision is necessary to ensure fair and responsive protection.