Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial MAQASIDI
Fatahillah, Zahrul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tingkat Kepatuhan Masyarakat Aceh Terhadap Surat Edaran Penjabat Gubernur Aceh Nomor 451/11286 Fatahillah, Zahrul
MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 3, No. 2 (Desember 2023)
Publisher : MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum published by the Islamic Criminal Law Program of the Sharia and Islamic Economics Department at the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/maqasidi.v3i2.2239

Abstract

Belakangan ini di Aceh sedang marak terjadi pelanggaran Syari’at Islam, kejadian tersebut termasuk di warung kopi dan café sehingga Penjabat Gubernur Aceh mengeluarkan Surat Edaran Nomor 451/11286 untuk memerintahkan pemilik usaha warung kopi dan café menutup tempat usahanya pada pukul 24:00 WIB. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mencari tahu tingkat kepatuhan masyarakat Aceh terhadap Surat Edaran Penjabat Gubernur Aceh Nomor 451/11286. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris untuk mencari tahu praktik hukum di masyarkat. penulis menemukan bahwa mayoritas masyarakat Aceh sudah memiliki kesadaran hukum ditandai dengan kepatuhan mereka terhadap Surat Edaran tersebut atas dasar keyakinannya sendiri. Namun juga masih banyak ditemui dari pelaku usaha yang mentaati aturan karena takut akan sanksi hukum yang akan mengancamnya, ini artinya kesadaran hukum pelaku usaha masih rendah. Penulis dapat memberi saran kepada Pemerintah Aceh agar dalam perumusan aturan hukum seharusnya melibatkan segala unsur masyarakat sehingga produk hukum menjadi konsensus bersama antara pemerintah dan unsur masyarakat dan dapat diterima dengan baik dalam masyarakat, kemudian untuk masyarakat agar membantu pemerintah untuk menyukseskan pelaksanaan syari’at Islam di Aceh.
CONCRETIZATIONOF URGENT REASON AND SUFFICIENTEVIDENCE IN PROVIDING MARRIAGE DISPENSATION FOR CHILDREN BY THE JUDGE Mansari, Mansari; Fatahillah, Zahrul; Muzakir, Muzakir; Oslami, Ahmad Fikri; Zainuddin, Muslim
Nurani Vol 20 No 2 (2020): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v20i2.5898

Abstract

The article discusses the concretization of urgent reasons and sufficient evidence for granting marriage dispensations in Law Number 16 Year 2019. This purpose of this study is how to concretize urgent reasons and sufficient evidence by the judge inproviding marriage dispensations for children. Researchers used empirical legal research methods and primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and primary data obtained through interviews with Syar’iyah court judges. Data analysis was performed prescriptively to provide an assessment of the implementation of the Marriage Law. The results showed that the petition for marriage dispensation for children after the legitimation of Law Number 16 Year 2019 increased despite being complicated by the Supreme Court Regulations and it was resulted that the age of the petitionfor marriage dispensation between 15 and 19 years old. Children must attend the court for obtaining the advice related to the risk of child marriage. Concretization of the urgent condition and sufficient evidence is carried out with observing the facts at thecouncil, namely worrying about acts that are prohibited from religion, getting pregnant out of wedlock and doing tandem (khalwat). The sufficient evidences were concreted by the judge. He/She requested the witnesses who knew the background of the parents and prospective husband/ wife attended the council to investigate the reasons for the marriage of the child and proof of marriage rejection from the KUA, Child Identity Cards, birth certificates and final diplomas. It is recommended that judges must prioritize the best interestfor the children and the reproductive health certificate from the hospital should be requested.
Judge's Consideration In Deciding The Amount Of Child -Deported Child Caring Costs In Decision Number 266/PDT.G/2023/MS.BNA AND 267/PDT.G/2023/MS.BNA Fatahillah, Zahrul
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL DUSTURIAH
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v15i1.23176

Abstract

Children have the right to get a living after the divorce from their parents, but the Marriage Law does not determine the amount. As a result, the panel of judges in decision Number 266/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna determined Rp. 1,000,000 and in decision Number 267/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna the amount was Rp. 1,500,000. This study aims to analyze the basis for the judge's considerations in determining the amount of post-divorce child support and a juridical review of the two decisions. This research includes juridical research. The primary legal material is the Marriage Law, decision Number 266/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna and decision Number 267/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna. data analysis was carried out qualitatively based on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that the judge's consideration in determining the amount of post-divorce child rearing costs is based on the father's ability. Father's ability is obtained based on the witnesses presented to the trial. In addition, the basis for the judge's consideration was based on the petitum of the plaintiff's lawsuit which asked the panel of judges to order the defendant to pay post-divorce childcare costs. Legally, it is justifiable to provide post-divorce childcare costs that vary from one decision to another. Article 41 of the Marriage Law, Article 105 letter b and Article 156 KHI do not limit the amount of fees that must be given, so that the decision of the panel of judges giving the total cost of raising children post-divorce amounted to IDR 1,000,000 in decision Number 266/Pdt.G/2023/MS .Bna and decision Number 267/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna amounting to Rp. 1,500,000 is something that is justified according to law.
Co-Authors Mansari, Mansari Muslim Zainuddin Muzakir Oslami, Ahmad Fikri