Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Pelaksanaan Pemberian Rehabilitasi Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Teori Relatif Hidayat, Tengku Arif; Haikal, Daffa; Sihombing, Mula Raja; Jovannellha, Resa Dwi; Annisa, Uldri
Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal
Publisher : Al Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/mutiara.v1i2.12

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengeksplorasi pelaksanaan pemberian rehabilitasi terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika di Indonesia dalam perspektif teori relatif. Upaya rehabilitasi merupakan suatu pendekatan yang dapat digunakan untuk membantu proses individu yang mengalami penyalahgunaan narkotika agar dapat pulih dan kembali berfungsi secara optimal dalam masyarakat. Dalam perspektif teori relatif, pelaksanaan pemberian rehabilitasi terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika dianggap sebagai upaya yang sangat kompleks, yang melibatkan berbagai faktor dan pemahaman yang berbeda. Dalam penelitian ini, digunakan metode kualitatif yang melibatkan pengamatan mendalam terkait pelaksanaan rehabilitasi dalam perspektif teori relatif. Data diperoleh dari artikel-artikel relevan, jurnal, buku, dan sumber-sumber pustaka lainnya yang kemudian dianalisis secara rinci sesuai dengan temuan yang didapatkan. Lalu kemudian diuraikan dengan sebaik mungkin sesuai dengan hasil yang didapatkan. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa rehabilitasi narkotika merupakan bagian integral dari upaya pemidanaan yang bertujuan untuk membantu pecandu narkotika pulih dan mencegahnya mengulangi penggunaan narkotika. Hal ini didasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip teori relatif dalam pemidanaan, di mana pemidanaan bertujuan untuk perbaikan dan pencegahan kejahatan.

TINJAUAN YURIDIS AUTOPSI ULANG KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA DAN KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIANNYA Riandra, Daffa Azta; Erdiansyah, Erdiansyah; Hidayat, Tengku Arif
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Januari - Juni 2024
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

In criminal cases, evidence is always a principal and crucial matter,because sometimes in processing a case. Witnesses, victims and perpetrators aresilent, meaning they do not want to provide information. Because it makes proofsomething important. In practice, autopsies are performed more than once. Thefunction of the autopsy is as a criterion in determining the criminal liability of theperpetrator. If there is a re-autopsy whether the judge ignores one of them, and ifthere are two autopsy results how the judge assesses each autopsy because notnecessarily the results of the re-autopsy are correct. This raises the uncertainty ofthe position of the re-autopsy results for the purposes of trial evidence. Then inthe forensic regulation in Indonesia, it does not clearly regulate re-autopsy,including the conditions that must be met if you want to do a re-autopsy, the timelimit for re-autopsy and how many times a re-autopsy is carried out. Theregulation of re-autopsy in Indonesia is not regulated in legislation and has notclearly regulated the position of re-autopsy evidence and its legal certainty.This research is classified into normative juridical research. The data usedare primary data and secondary data consisting of primary legal materials,secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collectiontechnique uses the literature review method, namely describing and analyzingdata from several sources such as laws, books and opinions of criminal lawexperts. This research was then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The inferencetechnique used is by doing a deductive mindset.The results of this study are that re-autopsy is valid because it strengthensthe search for material truth of a criminal act and re-autopsy re-autopsy forevidentiary purposes depends on the judge's consideration in assessing the resultsof the re-autopsy. Because the value of the evidentiary power is free, it is hopedthat the judge will consider justice, expediency and legal certainty in decidingcriminal cases so that there will be no misguided decisions.Keywords : Autopsy,Victim,Criminal Act,Evidence

TINJAUAN YURIDIS AUTOPSI ULANG KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA DAN KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIANNYA Riandra, Daffa Azta; Erdiansyah, Erdiansyah; Hidayat, Tengku Arif
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Januari - Juni 2024
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

In criminal cases, evidence is always a principal and crucial matter,because sometimes in processing a case. Witnesses, victims and perpetrators aresilent, meaning they do not want to provide information. Because it makes proofsomething important. In practice, autopsies are performed more than once. Thefunction of the autopsy is as a criterion in determining the criminal liability of theperpetrator. If there is a re-autopsy whether the judge ignores one of them, and ifthere are two autopsy results how the judge assesses each autopsy because notnecessarily the results of the re-autopsy are correct. This raises the uncertainty ofthe position of the re-autopsy results for the purposes of trial evidence. Then inthe forensic regulation in Indonesia, it does not clearly regulate re-autopsy,including the conditions that must be met if you want to do a re-autopsy, the timelimit for re-autopsy and how many times a re-autopsy is carried out. Theregulation of re-autopsy in Indonesia is not regulated in legislation and has notclearly regulated the position of re-autopsy evidence and its legal certainty.This research is classified into normative juridical research. The data usedare primary data and secondary data consisting of primary legal materials,secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collectiontechnique uses the literature review method, namely describing and analyzingdata from several sources such as laws, books and opinions of criminal lawexperts. This research was then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The inferencetechnique used is by doing a deductive mindset.The results of this study are that re-autopsy is valid because it strengthensthe search for material truth of a criminal act and re-autopsy re-autopsy forevidentiary purposes depends on the judge's consideration in assessing the resultsof the re-autopsy. Because the value of the evidentiary power is free, it is hopedthat the judge will consider justice, expediency and legal certainty in decidingcriminal cases so that there will be no misguided decisions.Keywords : Autopsy,Victim,Criminal Act,Evidence

PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KEBAKARAN HUTAN DAN LAHAN (KARHUTLA) DI WILAYAH KEPOLISIAN RESORT ROKAN HULU Siregar, Muharram Saidi Akbar; R, Mukhlis; Hidayat, Tengku Arif
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Januari - Juni 2024
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Forest fires are no longer a rare phenomenon in Indonesia, especially inRiau Province. In fact, fires also occurred on small plots of land in communityvillages. Every year forest and land fires regularly occur in Riau Province andespecially in Rokan Hulu district. The rampant burning of forests and land inRokan Hulu Regency in particular is also caused by many people wanting to openoil palm plantations, because palm oil production is currently being sold at quiteexpensive prices compared to previous years. The perpetrators of forest and landburning got away with it without strict law enforcement by the Rokan Hulu Resortpolice. Various regulations regarding the criminal act of burning forests and landhave clear penalties starting from the Plantation Law, Forestry Law, and PPLHLaw.The method for writing this research was carried out by means ofsociological legal research. This research was carried out in the Rokan Huluresort police area, because from data obtained from the Rokan Hulu RegionalDisaster Management Agency (BPBD) cases of forest and land fires increaseddrastically, especially in 2022 The author took samples including the Head ofCriminal Investigation Unit of the Rokan Hulu Police, three investigators fromUnit 2 of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Rohul Police, the Head of Head ofthe Rokan Hulu Regional Police Headquarters, and the community affected at thelocation of the fire.From the research results obtained from interviews, the first conclusioncan be drawn. The first way to enforce criminal law against perpetrators of forestand land fire crimes is to make adjustments to the applicable laws or carry outrepressive measures, namely by processes including carrying out inquiries andinvestigations. The two obstacles experienced by investigators in enforcing thelaw on forest and land fire crimes are remote crime scenes. Third, the efforts thathave been made by the Rokan Hulu Police to prevent forest and land fires havebeen coordinated with the government.Keywords: Law Enforcement-Forest and Land Fires-Crime.

Tinjauan Yuridis Urgensi Keberadaan Motif dalam Memutus Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Sembiring, Tara Yuliandora; Ardiyanto, Syaifullah Yophie; Hidayat, Tengku Arif
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i6.16622

Penelitian ini mengkaji urgensi motif dalam penjatuhan pidana pada tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana di Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana pada kasus pembunuhan berencana, mengkaji peran motif dalam pembuktian dan penjatuhan pidana, serta memberikan rekomendasi pengaturan motif secara eksplisit dalam hukum pidana Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa motif memiliki urgensi yang tinggi dalam penjatuhan pidana pada tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana. Hakim tidak hanya mendasarkan pada terpenuhinya unsur-unsur delik, tetapi juga mempertimbangkan motif pelaku sebagai faktor penting dalam menilai kesalahan, kesengajaan, dan dampak perbuatan. Diperlukan pengaturan yang lebih eksplisit tentang kedudukan motif dalam hukum pidana Indonesia, demi terwujudnya keadilan substantif dalam penegakan hukum.

Title

Found 15 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 15 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 15 Documents
Search