Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.295
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Prophetic Law Review UNISKA LAW REVIEW Journal La Sociale Eastasouth Journal of Effective Community Services ILJS
Myaskur, Myaskur
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : ILJS

 1 
Aspek Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Adat Myaskur, Myaskur; Wahyudiono, Tri
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, September 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v9i2.600

Abstract

In Indonesia, the resolution of customary land disputes involves a complex interplay between customary law and national law. Customary law, deeply rooted in the cultural practices and traditions of indigenous communities, plays a crucial role in managing land conflicts that arise within these communities. This paper examines the legal aspects of resolving customary land disputes, highlighting the significance of integrating customary law into the national legal framework to ensure the protection of indigenous rights. The study reveals that while national laws provide a formal mechanism for dispute resolution, they often overlook the unique cultural contexts and values inherent in customary law. Consequently, this can lead to unresolved conflicts and dissatisfaction among indigenous peoples. The research suggests that a hybrid model of dispute resolution, which combines elements of both customary and national law, could enhance the effectiveness of conflict resolution processes. By recognizing and legitimizing customary practices within the national legal system, this approach aims to promote social justice and equity for indigenous communities in Indonesia.
Perbandingan Hukum Siyasah dan Hukum Positif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Myaskur, Myaskur; Ubaidillah, Nizam
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, Maret 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v9i1.932

Abstract

Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) often encounter disputes that impact political stability and public trust. This study compares siyasah law and positive law in resolving Pilkada disputes. Positive law, based on formal regulations, emphasizes legality and transparency through institutions like the Constitutional Court. Conversely, siyasah law, rooted in sharia principles, offers a deliberation-based approach focusing on communal welfare. The analysis reveals that positive law excels in legal certainty but lacks adaptability to local contexts, while siyasah law is more flexible but faces challenges in implementation within a plural society. This study recommends integrating both approaches to establish a more equitable, effective, and community-responsive dispute resolution mechanism for Pilkada.
Aspek Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Adat Myaskur, Myaskur; Wahyudiono, Tri
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, September 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v9i2.600

Abstract

In Indonesia, the resolution of customary land disputes involves a complex interplay between customary law and national law. Customary law, deeply rooted in the cultural practices and traditions of indigenous communities, plays a crucial role in managing land conflicts that arise within these communities. This paper examines the legal aspects of resolving customary land disputes, highlighting the significance of integrating customary law into the national legal framework to ensure the protection of indigenous rights. The study reveals that while national laws provide a formal mechanism for dispute resolution, they often overlook the unique cultural contexts and values inherent in customary law. Consequently, this can lead to unresolved conflicts and dissatisfaction among indigenous peoples. The research suggests that a hybrid model of dispute resolution, which combines elements of both customary and national law, could enhance the effectiveness of conflict resolution processes. By recognizing and legitimizing customary practices within the national legal system, this approach aims to promote social justice and equity for indigenous communities in Indonesia.
Perbandingan Hukum Siyasah dan Hukum Positif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Myaskur, Myaskur; Ubaidillah, Nizam
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, Maret 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v9i1.932

Abstract

Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) often encounter disputes that impact political stability and public trust. This study compares siyasah law and positive law in resolving Pilkada disputes. Positive law, based on formal regulations, emphasizes legality and transparency through institutions like the Constitutional Court. Conversely, siyasah law, rooted in sharia principles, offers a deliberation-based approach focusing on communal welfare. The analysis reveals that positive law excels in legal certainty but lacks adaptability to local contexts, while siyasah law is more flexible but faces challenges in implementation within a plural society. This study recommends integrating both approaches to establish a more equitable, effective, and community-responsive dispute resolution mechanism for Pilkada.
Co-Authors Ambodo, Triyo Ananta, Klarisa Desi Munir, Samsul Salafiyah, Nurul Tohawi, Agus Ubaidillah, Nizam Wahyudiono, Tri