Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.457
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK) Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya (JBP) Jurnal Pemberdayaan: Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Masyarakat Merdeka (JMM) BiosciED: Journal of Biological Science and Education SCHOOLAR: Social and Literature Study in Education APPLICATION: Applied science in Learning Research Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan IPA Exact Paper In Compilation (EPIC) JoEMS : Journal of Education and Management Studies
Ami, Mucharommah Sartika
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : APPLICATION: Applied science in Learning Research

 1 
Identifying Learning Styles of Biology Education Students Ami, Mucharommah Sartika; Yanti, Norma Linda
APPLICATION: Applied science in Learning Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): June
Publisher : LPPM Universitas KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32764/application.v4i1.4494

Abstract

It is necessary to identify student learning styles, especially by lecturers, to understand student characteristics before preparing learning plans. This research aims to identify types of learning styles of biology education students at Universitas KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah. The method used is a survey with an instrument in the form of a learning style questionnaire. The total population of biology education students is 67 and the respondents who filled out the questionnaire were 48 students. The data obtained was analyzed descriptively. There are five types of learning styles identified from the results of this research, namely visual, auditory, kinesthetic, visual auditory, and visual kinesthetic. The learning style that most students have is auditory, both male and female students. Only female students showed a combination learning style, namely visual auditory and visual kinesthetic.
Analysis of Learning Style of Phase E students at MAN 1 Jombang Cahyati, Ayuni Eka; Ami, Mucharommah Sartika
APPLICATION: Applied science in Learning Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): February
Publisher : LPPM Universitas KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32764/application.v3i3.4605

Abstract

Students' learning styles are considered very important for the learning process and results learning, besides that, teachers also have an important role in implementing the learning process to students who have adapted to their learning styles. From the research that has been done The aim was to identify and analyze the learning styles of phase E students at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Jombang. In this research This is called descriptive research. This research was carried out by interviewing teachers and then providing information questionnaire/questionnaire to students, which is the questionnaire contains several statements that have been adapted to learning style theory, namely visual, kinesthetic and auditory. In this study there were 47 students who filled out the questionnaire and The results obtained were that of the 47 students, 12 of them had different learning styles visual, 16 of them have an auditory learning style, and 16 students have a learning style kinesthetic learning, apart from that, there were also 3 students who had more than one learning style, namely visual and kinesthetic and 1 student had the visual auditory kinesthetic learning style at the same time. It can be seen that the kinesthetic learning style dominates the learning style other. Because basically, students have characteristic ways of receiving more than one piece of information, but still only one way will stand out more in each student. Based on these results, it is stated that the way of learning that each person has Students will of course be different.
Correlation Between Gender and Students’ Biology Learning Outcomes Ami, Mucharommah Sartika; Rusdiana, Siti
APPLICATION: Applied science in Learning Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): October
Publisher : LPPM Universitas KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32764/application.v3i2.4741

Abstract

Gender is still an issue that is always linked to students’ ability, including their learning outcomes. This research aims to examine the correlation between gender and students’ biology learning outcomes. The research involved 15 male and 15 female students from classes X, XI, and XII Science at MA Ghozaliyah in the 2022/2023 academic year. Students’ biology learning outcomes were obtained from odd semester final exam scores. Data analysis was carried out statistically using the Eta correlation formula. The research results show that there is a weak negative linear relationship between gender and students’ biology learning outcomes, because the eta value obtained was 2,94 and Fcount < Ftable at a significance level of 0,01.
The Influence of Printed Teaching Material on Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes Ami, Mucharommah Sartika; Aminah, Mucharommah Dewi
APPLICATION: Applied science in Learning Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): February
Publisher : LPPM Universitas KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32764/application.v4i3.5600

Abstract

Printed teaching materials are still relevant to be used as learning resources for students. Through this research we analyze the effect of printed modules on students’ cognitive learning outcomes in plant physiology courses. We used the one-shot case study method involving 12 students taking plant physiology courses in the 2024/2025 academic year. The cognitive learning outcomes used as data are mid-semester and final semester exam scores. Data analysis was carried out by sign test. The significance level used is 5%, H0 is rejected if the calculated value is smaller than the table value. H0 in this research is that there is no effect of using printed modules on student cognitive learning outcomes. The sign test results show that the calculated h value is greater than the table h value, so H0 is accepted. The use of printed modules did not affect students’ cognitive learning outcomes in this study.
Co-Authors A'yuni, Anti Qurrota alifa, laily Aminah, Mucharommah Dewi Anggi Indah Yuliana Anggraini, Feni Anggun Wulandari Cahyati, Ayuni Eka Faizah, Mazidatul Fikriah, Lailatul Fithriah, Zuhriatul Hariono, Tholib Huda, Achmad Miftahul Khikmawati, Nanda Hilda Ma'fulah, Siti Meishanti, Ospa Pea Yuanita Nisa’, Izzatin Nur Hidayah Nurmalasari, Siti Santika, Dwi Siti Rusdiana Subiyanto, Ardip Yanti, Norma Linda