Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jambe Law Journal AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW NUSANTARA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)
Ali, Chaidir
Research And Dedication Department, Universitas Lampung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Law Making Treaties: The Implication of International Law towards Indonesia’s Legislations Rudi Natamiharja; Rudy Rudy; Chaidir Ali
Jambe Law Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jlj.3.2.191-210

Abstract

In relation to promoting global issues in international forums, several sources of international law are formed. These formed laws are in the figure of law-making treaties, which are closely related to international regimes that influence the behavior of international actors. However, in developing countries, such as Indonesia, International law is considered the outermost layer of the legal order under national law, colonial law, religious law, and customary law. Thus, it is a challenge for international laws to be enforced in a broad society. Therefore to make international law hold an implementative power, the laws need to be adopted in the national law. This article aims to examine the implication of international laws, especially in international treaties towards Indonesia legislation. It is carried out by mapping a series of international treaties ratified and enacted through national laws in Indonesia. The results of this study demonstrates that until 2019 the Indonesian Government has bound itself in 302 agreements. From the 302 treaties, only 61 international treaties were Law-Making Treaty, and only UNCLOS 1982 has implicated by the Indonesian Government through Law No. 32 of 2014 concerning Maritime Law.
Formal Constitutional Review Paradox: The Law on Legislation Making between Legal Procedure and Constitutional Norms Ali, Chaidir; Fatmawati
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v51.27578

Abstract

This paper analyses the paradoxical status of the Law on Legislation Making (LOLM) as a benchmark in formal constitutional review of legislation in Indonesia. Although the 1945 Constitution mandates procedural regulation through Article 22A, it offers minimal substance on the formal techniques of law-making, delegating this authority to statutory legislation. This gap creates ambiguity in judicial practice, especially for the Constitutional Court in performing formal reviews. Employing normative legal research, this study combines statutory, case, and comparative approaches, and also by examining 67 Constitutional Court decisions from 2003–2024. The findings revealed that LOLM is increasingly used as an imperative benchmark in formal reviews, despite some judicial reluctance and interpretive contradictions. The paper highlights three key jurisprudential provide within Constitutional Court Decision No. 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003, No. 27/PUU-VII/2009, and No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020—which affirm LOLM’s normative authority in ensuring procedural compliance with the 1945 Constitution. Comparisons with constitutional practices in Jordan, Azerbaijan, Korea, Myanmar, and Türkiye show that legislative instruments is a legitimate judicial tool when constitutions are substantively incomplete. The research concludes that LOLM, although a statutory law, must be treated as a constitutionally imperative norm in formal judicial review. To preserve its legitimacy and legal stability, LOLM should regulate all technical aspects of legislative procedure comprehensively without sub-delegation to institutional regulations. LOLM must maintain fidelity to the 1945 Constitution principles while ensuring procedural rigor in legislative formation.
Peningkatan Pembelajaran Hukum : Metode dan Strategi Efektif dalam Pendidikan Hukum M. Iwan Satriawan; Reisa Malida; Chaidir Ali; Rudy Rudy
Nusantara: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Mei: NUSANTARA Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/nusantara.v5i2.5380

Abstract

The objective of this journal article is to present the findings of a dissemination activity concerning effective methods for studying legal science within faculties of law. This initiative responds to the persistent issue of the low quality of law graduates from institutions of higher education in Indonesia. The dissemination of effective learning methods in legal studies reveals that the improvement of campus facilities, paricularly classroom, libraries, and the overall safety of the academic environment must be prioritized alongside the enchancement of teaching staff quality. Such enhacement may be pursued by increasing lecturer’s income, thereby allowing them to concentate solely on reserch and teaching without the burden of administrative duties. Improved lecturer quality is expected to contribute significantly to academic quality of law graduates. This is due to the fundamental principle that effective legal education requires extensive reading, which is facilitated through library devolepment, as well as the frequent practice of procedural law, which necessitates the availibility of a legal laboratory in the form of a moot coourt facility.
Law in Action During Disaster Recovery in Lampung Coastal Village Rudy, Rudy; Helvi Yanfika; Dorothy Rouly H. Pandjaitan; Martina Anggi Silova; Chaidir Ali
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian State Law Review, October 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v8i2.20873

Abstract

Post-disaster recovery serves as a crucial step within the broader framework of disaster management, acting to restore affected communities and environments to a state of resilience. However, the effectiveness of these recovery efforts is significantly undermined when they are not implemented in an integrative manner. This lack of cohesion can render the entire disaster management approach less impactful. This situation exemplifies the persistent challenges faced by disaster management models in Indonesia, particularly in the aftermath of significant events such as the 2018 tsunami that devastated the coastal regions of Lampung. This study employs socio-empirical research methods to analyze the post-disaster recovery model enacted by the National Disaster Management Agency (NDMA) across three coastal villages in Lampung. Through a comprehensive examination of the implemented strategies and their outcomes, the research team has identified critical shortcomings: specifically, the failure to adopt an integrative approach has led to inefficiencies and a lack of sustainability in the recovery efforts. As a response to these findings, this paper aims to establish a analytic of how law interact with the reality of disaster recovery through case studies on Tsunami Disaster Recovery by Government.
Co-Authors Dorothy Rouly H. Pandjaitan Fatmawati Fatmawati Helvi Yanfika M. Iwan Satriawan Martina Anggi Silova Natamiharja, Rudi Reisa Malida rudy rudy Rudy Rudy Rudy Rudy