Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.893
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEM RESEARCH (JOSH) Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence SIGMA: Information Technology Journal Jurnal Pustaka AI : Pusat Akses Kajian Teknologi Artificial Intelligence Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis VIDHEAS: Jurnal Nasional Abdimas Multidisiplin Jurnal Pelita Pengabdian Cahaya Pengabdian
Surojudin, Nurhadi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Astronomy Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis

 1 
Perbandingan Metode Klasifikasi dalam Memprediksi Penyakit Ginjal Kronis Ermanto; Surojudin, Nurhadi
Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis Vol. 7, No. 3 (September 2025)
Publisher : SAFE-Network

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37034/infeb.v7i3.1263

Abstract

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a global health issue with an increasing prevalence that poses a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. Early detection of CKD is crucial to provide proper treatment before the disease progresses to end-stage renal failure. With technological advancements, machine learning methods have been widely utilized to support medical diagnosis with greater speed and accuracy. This study aims to compare the performance of two popular classification algorithms, Decision Tree C4.5 and Naïve Bayes, in predicting CKD using a public dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository consisting of 400 patient records with 24 clinical attributes. The research process involved systematic preprocessing steps, including handling missing values, transforming categorical data into numerical form, and selecting relevant attributes. Model evaluation was conducted using 10-Fold Cross Validation with performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, Area Under the Curve (AUC), and statistical T-Test. The results show that Decision Tree C4.5 achieved an accuracy of 93.00%, precision of 84.27%, recall of 100%, and an AUC of 0.944, while Naïve Bayes obtained an accuracy of 93.50%, precision of 85.23%, recall of 100%, and an AUC of 0.948. Although the performance differences between both algorithms are relatively small and statistically insignificant, Naïve Bayes demonstrated slightly better results in terms of accuracy and AUC, while Decision Tree C4.5 offers advantages in interpretability through its classification rules. In conclusion, both algorithms are effective for early CKD diagnosis, and the choice may depend on practical needs, whether emphasizing interpretability or computational efficiency. This study contributes to the development of more accurate and efficient clinical decision support systems for improving healthcare services in CKD management.
Co-Authors . Ermanto ., Edora Abdul Ghofir Afriantoro, Irfan Andriani Apisca, Dhea Djoko Nugroho Effendi, M. Makmun Effendi, Muhammad Makmun Elkin Rilvani Ermanto Fachrial Banyu Asmoro Halim Anshor, Abdul Ikhsan Romli Maulana, Donny Muhtajuddin Danny Naufal, Luthfi Eka Nugroho, Agung Pradini, Purnama Sakhrial Pratama, Suria Purnama Sakhrial Putra, Fibi Eko Saiful Muktiali Siswandi, Arif Suryadi Suryadi, Dikky Turmud Zy, Ahmad Turmudi Zy, Ahmad Yoga Pratama, Evan Zy, Ahmad Turmudi