Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review
Mayasari Muin, Audyna
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
THE GAMBLING CRIME PREVENTION EFFORTS MAYASARI MUIN, AUDYNA; TENRI FAMAURI, ANDI; MARWAH; ALRIP, ISMAIL
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (136.042 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v3i1.99

Abstract

The crime of gambling is regulated in Article 303 and Article 303 bis of the Criminal Code (KUHP), this crime is included in the category of crimes against decency. The sanctions for gambling crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code are of an alternative nature, that is, they are punishable by the main punishment in the form of imprisonment or a fine, in which the punishment is based on the qualification of the act committed by the perpetrator. Prevention efforts that can be made against the prevalence of gambling cases, especially in Wajo Regency, use a criminological approach which consists of pre-emptive, preventive and regressive efforts. The form of preventive efforts taken is in the form of structuring laws and regulations, providing legal counseling to the public and optimal law enforcement against gambling crimes.
THE POSITION OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 4 YEAR 2014 IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIVERSION BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR BASED ON THE REGULATION OF LAW SATRIANI AS, ANDI; MAYASARI MUIN, AUDYNA; INDRAWATI, DARA
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (158.08 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v3i1.103

Abstract

The judge continued to carry out diversions against a child who had committed a criminal offense, one of the articles of which was punishable by a sentence of under seven years. For the prosecutors themselves, there is no such rule, but in practice, in practice, many prosecutors carry out Supreme Court Regulations No. 4 Year 2014, in the sense that prosecutors continue to diversify children who commit crimes with a sentence of more than 7 years as long as the prosecutors overlay the charges. 7 years and under, and the average diversion is successful. This paper aims to analyze the position of Supreme Court Regulations Number 4 Year 2014 in the implementation of diversion by the public prosecutor based on the laws and regulations. The type of research used is social legal research. The data used are primary data (obtained directly from respondents and resource persons, namely the Luwu Office Attorney using interview techniques) and secondary data (various references or scientific papers in the field of law in the form of legal books and research documents related to previous data and statutory regulations. invitation). All data collected were analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the position of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2014 in the implementation of diversion by the public prosecutor is a rule that regulates the procedures for solving a problem in order to smooth the judiciary, in this case the implementation of diversion, given that there is a legal vacuum regarding the procedures for implementing diversion after the formation of the Law Number 11 Year 2012 concerning SPPA, where in the Law it is ordered that the Government Regulation regarding the implementation of diversion be made no later than 1 year from the enactment of the SPPA Law, but in reality the Government Regulation in question was promulgated outside of the stipulated time, so there is a vacancy law in the implementation of the SPPA Law. The Supreme Court which is given the authority by law to make complementary rules to fill the legal gaps or gaps has appropriately exercised its authority through the formation of the said Supreme Court Regulation.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S ERRORS IN MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARGES IMAM LAHAYA, ACHMAD; MAYASARI MUIN, AUDYNA; INDRAWATI, DARA
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (142.484 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v2i2.106

Abstract

Amendments in charges are not recognized in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). There is no mechanism for changing the charges, the Criminal Procedure Code only allows the Prosecutor to change the indictment, in practice it was found that the Public Prosecutor in his response (replik) corrected the indictment which he read out regarding errors regarding evidence where there is one piece of evidence that is not related to the case so that the Public Prosecutor correcting by reflecting/crossing out because it is not included in the evidence receipt at the time of transfer of this case to the Court. This paper aims to analyze the arrangements for the Public Prosecutor's claim letter based on statutory regulations. The result of the research shows that the letter of demands for the Public Prosecutor is determined in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Law on the Prosecution, read out after the examination process has been completed. The examination referred to is the examination of valid evidence in criminal law, namely witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions and statements of the Defendant, as well as examination of evidence. The indictment contains the charges for the sentence against the Defendant, the indictment is based on the indictment which contains a description of the incident of the criminal act and the Article that is suspected to be proven in the process of examining the evidence.
KEDUDUKAN JAKSA DALAM PELAKSANAAN PENUNTUTAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA MILITER BERDASARKAN SINGLE PROSECUTION SYSTEM Irfan F, Muh.; Muchtar, Syamsuddin; Mayasari Muin, Audyna
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 11 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55129/.v11i1.1698

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tentang kedudukan jaksa dalam pelaksanaan penuntutan dalam sistem peradilan pidana militer berdasarkan prinsip single prosecution system dan kendala Jaksa dalam pelaksanaan penuntutan dalam sistem peradilan pidana militer di Indonesia dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Kedudukan Jaksa dalam pelaksanaan penuntutan dalam sistem peradilan pidana militer berdasarkan prinsip single prosecution system adalah dengan dibentuknya Jaksa Agung Muda Pidana Militer yang merupakan sarana atau lembaga penuntutan satu atap yang menghimpun dan mengelaborasikan para Oditur Militer dan Jaksa untuk bersatu padu dalam koordinasi dan sinkronisasi pelaksanaan kebijakan di bidang teknis penuntutan dalam penanganan perkara koneksitas antara TNI dan Sipil sehingga kedudukan dapat memberikan dampak penguatan kelembagaan serta sebagai implementasi dari Pinsip Single Prosecution System Jaksa Agung adalah penuntut umum tertinggi di Indonesia. Kendala Jaksa dalam pelaksanaan penuntutan dalam sistem peradilan pidana militer di Indonesia belum adanya SOP koordinasi dalam pelaksanaan perkara sebagaimana tugas dan fungsi dibentuknya Jaksa Agung Muda Bidang Pidana Militer (Jampidmil).
UPAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM PEREDARAN KOSMETIK ILEGAL MELALUI E-COMMERCE OLEH PPNS BBPOM MAKASSAR Asirah, Asirah; Muhammad Sofyan, Andi; Mayasari Muin, Audyna
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Upaya penegakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Balai Besar Pengawas Obat dan Makanan di Makassar terhadap peredaran kosmetik ilegal melalui e-Commerce sesuai yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan. Terdapat beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi proses penegakan hukum ini. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis upaya yang dilakukan PPNS BBPOM Makassar dan untuk membahas hambatan yang dihadapi dalam penegakan hukum terhadap peredaran kosmetik ilegal melalui e-commerce di wilayah kerja BBPOM Makassar. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode empiris melalui pendekatan interdisipliner. Sumber bahan hukum primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan PPNS BBPOM Makassar dan hasil survei terhadap konsumen yang berada di wilayah kerja BBPOM Makassar. Bahan hukum sekunder diperoleh dari peraturan, buku hukum dan jurnal hukum. Bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang terkumpul dikaji secara kualitatif deskriptif. Upaya penegakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh PPNS BBPOM Makassar terdiri atas upaya preventif dan upaya represif. Secara preventif upaya penegakan hukum dilakukan untuk mencegah terjadinya pelanggaran melalui kegiatan patroli siber. Upaya represif dilakukan ketika terjadi pelanggaran hukum melalui proses penyidikan. Upaya penegakan hukum dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor antara lain dari hukum itu sendiri, penegak hukum, sarana dan prasarana penunjang, pengaruh masyarakat dan pengaruh kebudayaan.
KAJIAN TEORI HUKUM CHAOS TERHADAP PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN DI KOTA MAKASSAR Hasdiwanti, Hasdiwanti; Heryani, Wiwie; Mayasari Muin, Audyna
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.488

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hukum pidana formil dan materil terkait penanganan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan di Kota Makassar dan bagaimana kajian teori hukum chaos terhadap penanganan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan di Kota Makassar. Jenis penelitian yang penulis gunakan yakni penelitian hukum normatif-empiris. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kota Makassar yakni di Polrestabes Makassar, Kejaksaan Negeri Makassar, Pengadilan Negeri Makassar, LSKP, LSM GMBI, KNIP, AJI, Ormas Oi, dan PBHI-LBH Makassar. Hasil yang diperoleh selanjutnya dianalisis dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Penegak hukum belum menerapkan hukum pidana formil dan materil dalam menangani begal dengan baik. Adapun penanganan terhadap begal yang dilakukan masyarakat bertentangan dengan hukum pidana formil maupun materil, mereka melakukan perbuatan main hakim sendiri yang bertentangan dengan Pasal 365 dan Pasal 170 KUHP serta Pasal 44 dan Pasal 33 ayat (1) Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. 2) Kegagalan penegak hukum untuk meminimalisir terjadinya begal di Kota Makassar membuat masyarakat menjadi tidak percaya dengan kinerja penegak hukum hingga menggunakan cara sendiri dalam menanganai begal telah mengakibatkan kekacauan hukum. Namun, terlepas dari kekacauan yang terjadi, menurut teori chaos, maka hukum akan kembali pada kondisi yang teratur dengan kerjasama masing-masing pihak.
Co-Authors Asirah, Asirah Hasdiwanti, Hasdiwanti IMAM LAHAYA, ACHMAD Indrawati, Dara Irfan F, Muh. Ismail Alrip Marwah Muhammad Sofyan, Andi SATRIANI AS, ANDI Syamsuddin Muchtar TENRI FAMAURI, ANDI Wiwie Heryani