Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.57
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Veteran Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) Journal of Mandalika Literature Legalpreneur Journal SASI
Gayo, Sabela
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : SASI

 1 
Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques Gayo, Sabela
SASI Volume 29 Issue 3, September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477

Abstract

Introduction: In resolving ordinary maritime disputes related to national borders, from several types of dispute resolution, mediation is the right way to resolve disputes involving third parties.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to find out that in resolving martim aurann disputes the law is contained in international law, namely UNCLOS 1982 which regulates martim disputes.Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.Results of the Research: Alternative settlement of territorial boundary disputes can be done by, first, referring to UNCLOS 1982 through Bilateral Mutual Agreement in drawing a temporary line (equidistant line) using the equity principle and considering relevant factors and the possibility of modifying the equidistant line with the diplomatic approach of both countries, second, through the ASEAN mechanism, and. third, through the mechanism of the International Court of justice by promoting equitable principles and relevant circumstances.However, resolving with the second alternative is more appropriate because it can use mediation methods in maritime dispute resolution.
Loss of Advocate Immunity Due To Obstruction Of Justice Based On Criminal Provisions Gayo, Sabela
SASI Volume 28 Issue 4, December 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1071

Abstract

Introduction: The enforceability of Article 16 and the Constitutional Court decision number 26/PUU-XI/2013 does not necessarily exempt advocates from alleged intervention in the enforcement process in carrying out their profession to defend clients, but that right can be lost said the lawyer committed a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to explain the right of attorney immunity can be lost when committing a criminal act of Obstruction of Justice.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research with a statute legal approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: Advocates in terms of exercising their profession require immunity rights, but the use of immunity rights has definitive conditions that must be considered as stipulated in Article 16 of law no. 18 of 2003. The act of an advocate should be suspected of committing a criminal act of obstruction of justice if the act is not related to his professional duties and is not based on good faith. The action taken by The Advocate in relation to his professional duties has the meaning that the action is carried out for the benefit of the client's defense. Good faith referred to in Article 16 is to carry out professional duties for the sake of establishing justice based on the law to defend the interests of its clients.
Co-Authors Alfianto, Dwi Dharmawan, Dzaky Perdana Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati Dwi Atmoko Dzaky Perdana Dharmawan Gatot Efrianto Gomos Jaksana Putra Simandjuntak Lukman Hakim Mary, Dina Sekar Putri Nindyaningrum Sitompul, Ariman