This study aims to find out and understand the rules of sharia in pawning according to the four major schools of thought, namely Hanafiyah, Malikiyah, Syafiiyyah and Hanabilah, which are then compared between the evidence of each school of thought and the just munaqasyah regarding the hadith of Abu Hurairah, as well as the law on the use of pawning livestock both in terms of riding it and also drinking its milk. This study uses a descriptive analytical research type (non-statistical), which focuses on the study of manuscripts and texts, and uses a normative, historical legal approach method. The results of the study were as follows; First, Pawning is a process of borrowing and lending interaction by making certain goods as collateral for the creditor's debt which is held and controlled by the debtor, until the debt is paid off on time. The pillars of pawning include Rahin, Murtahin, Marhun/rahn, Marhun bih. Meanwhile, there are four conditions for pawning, namely the goods must be able to be traded, must be valuable property, Marhun must be able to be utilized according to sharia, its physical condition must be known, must be owned by the rahin (borrower or pawnbroker). Second, in the utilization of pawned property, if it is done by the rahin, the majority of scholars allow the rahin to utilize the pawned goods as long as they get permission from the murtahin. In addition, the rahin must guarantee that the goods are safe and intact. As for if the utilization of pawned property is done by the murtahin, the majority of scholars do not allow the murtahin to utilize the pawned goods absolutely, because the goods are not fully his property. The murtahin's right to the goods is only as collateral for the debt he gave, and if the person who owes is unable to pay off his debt, then he may sell or value the goods to pay off his debt.