Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Legal Review of the Execution of Mortgage Rights on Land (Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 10/PUU-XIX/2021) Triwanto Triwanto; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum; Dita Sari
Journal Customary Law Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/jcl.v2i4.4743

Abstract

The execution of mortgage rights on land is a crucial element in the property security legal system in Indonesia, which allows creditors to obtain debt repayment if the debtor defaults. However, the implementation of parate executie as a non-litigious mechanism based on Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights has sparked constitutional debates, particularly regarding the debtor's right to fair legal protection. This study analyzes the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court in Decision No. 10/PUU-XIX/2021, which rejected the constitutional review of the mortgage execution norms, and evaluates the legal execution procedures post-decision. Using the normative legal research method, this article examines the approach of contractual freedom, the principle of justice, and the protection of property rights in the context of creditor-debtor relationships. The study results show that the Court views parate executie as constitutionally valid, as long as it is carried out with the principles of transparency, proportionality, and the availability of legal recourse for the debtor. Therefore, legal protection within the mortgage system is not eliminated, but must be implemented through accountable and just practices. These findings provide an important normative basis for policymakers and economic actors in ensuring that the execution of guarantees runs effectively while still upholding the constitutional rights of the parties involved.
Penegakan Hukum Terkait Lingkungan Hidup Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Triwanto Triwanto; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum; Ester Saur Maulina Sinaga
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7019

Abstract

Lingkungan hidup di Indonesia menghadapi ancaman serius akibat eksploitasi sumber daya alam, pencemaran, dan lemahnya pengawasan. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup hadir sebagai instrumen hukum utama dalam menjaga kelestarian lingkungan, namun implementasinya di tingkat masyarakat masih menghadapi berbagai kendala. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman warga desa mengenai hak, kewajiban, serta peran mereka dalam mendukung penegakan hukum lingkungan hidup. Metode pelaksanaan dilakukan melalui ceramah, diskusi interaktif, serta pre-test dan post-test untuk mengukur peningkatan pemahaman peserta. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan dalam pengetahuan masyarakat tentang substansi UU No. 32/2009, khususnya prinsip kehati-hatian, partisipasi publik, dan tanggung jawab kolektif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa edukasi hukum berbasis partisipatif efektif dalam memperkuat kesadaran hukum sekaligus mendorong partisipasi masyarakat dalam menjaga kelestarian lingkungan hidup.
Keabsahan Jual Beli Tanah dan Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Sertifikat terhadap Penguasaan Tanpa Hak: Analisis Putusan Nomor 4/Pdt.G/2023/PN Boyolali Habib Dian Fahriza; Evelyn Nawang Cahya; Fadly Ardika Arofa; Gilberth Bonea Rachmat Santoso; Nirvan Wandaniel Manik; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i4.9059

Abstract

. Land ownership disputes in Indonesia often involve unauthorized occupation of land by parties lacking a valid legal basis, creating challenges for courts in assessing transaction validity and the evidentiary strength of ownership certificates. This study examines three legal issues in Decision No. 4/Pdt.G/2023/PN Boyolali: the validity of a land sale and purchase transaction before a Land Deed Official (PPAT), the evidentiary strength of Certificate of Ownership No. 01276, and the classification of the defendants’ conduct as an unlawful act under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. This research employs a normative juridical method with a case study approach using primary legal materials, including court decisions and statutory regulations, supported by secondary doctrinal sources. The analysis shows that the transaction before the PPAT fulfilled the requirements of Articles 1457–1458 of the Civil Code as well as customary law principles of transparency (terang) and immediate payment (tunai), thereby establishing its legal validity. The ownership certificate also served as strong documentary evidence under Article 32(1) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997, while the defendants failed to present authenticated evidence to support their claims. Moreover, the defendants’ continued occupation of the disputed land without lawful basis and despite repeated demands to vacate satisfied the elements of an unlawful act. This research contributes an integrated analytical framework combining transaction validity, certificate evidentiary strength, and unlawful act doctrine in Indonesian land law.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Nomor 150-PKE-DKPP/VII/2024 Tentang Perkara Pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu Ahmad Rafi Novanto; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum; FX Hastowo Broto Laksito
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): September: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i5.1876

Abstract

This study is driven by the necessity of upholding the ethical guidelines for those organizing elections to maintain the professionalism and integrity of electoral processes, especially regarding Decision of the Election Organizer Honorary Council (DKPP) Number 150-PKE-DKPP/VII/2024 related to suspected ethical breaches by the Chairperson and Members of the Karanganyar Regency General Elections Commission. The goal of this research is to evaluate the considerations made by DKPP in resolving the reported ethical breaches and to investigate the legal effects of this judgment on the Chairperson and Members of the Karanganyar Regency General Elections Commission. This research utilizes normative legal research along with both a statutory and case approach. The legal materials analyzed include primary, secondary, and tertiary resources gathered through library research, which were examined using deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that the DKPP's considerations were founded on an evaluation of the allegations made by the complainant, the responses from the respondents, testimonies from involved parties, and evidence, all assessed according to the principles of integrity, professionalism, independence, and accountability expected of election organizers. DKPP partially upheld the complaint, reinstating the reputations of Daryono, Santosa, Siti Halimatus Sa’diyah, and Andis Yuli Pamungkas, while issuing Devid Wahyuningtyas a Final Stern Warning. This decision is conclusive and obligatory, requiring the General Elections Commission to implement it within a week following its announcement. These legal implications reflect that the enforcement of ethical standards functions not merely as a means of penalties but also as a tool to uphold the dignity, integrity, and accountability of those who manage elections.  
Analisis Yuridis Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Elektronik Pinjam Meminjam Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (Fintech) Rinaldi Ravelino Wahyu; Dora Kusumastuti; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): September: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i5.1877

Abstract

The development of fintech peer-to-peer lending has introduced electronic agreements that create legal consequences for lenders and borrowers, particularly when contractual obligations are not fulfilled. This study aims to examine the validity and legal force of electronic agreements in fintech peer-to-peer lending services and to analyze the judge's legal considerations in resolving the default dispute in Decision Number 267/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bdg. This research employs normative legal research using a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials were collected through library research involving legislation, court decisions, legal books, and relevant literature, followed by qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that the electronic agreement in the case fulfilled the validity requirements stipulated in Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code and possessed legal force and evidentiary value under the provisions of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. The judge's determination of default was based on the existence of a contractual relationship, the borrower's receipt of funds, failure to fulfill payment obligations, and electronic evidence presented during the trial. The judge also determined the borrower's liability based on the terms of the agreement and assessed the plaintiff's claims according to their legal basis and evidentiary strength. The decision therefore reflects an effort to establish legal certainty and provide balanced legal protection for the parties involved.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90-01-05-12/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024 dalam Perspektif Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum Dewa Ramadhan Hariyanto; Agatha Jumiati; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): September: Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v3i3.3469

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the ratio decidendi in Constitutional Court Decision Number 90-01-05-12/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024 and examine the implications of the Court’s legal considerations for justice and legal certainty in the resolution of General Election Result Disputes. This research employs a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials were obtained through library research consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which were subsequently analyzed deductively. The results indicate that the Court’s ratio decidendi was systematically constructed through examination of its jurisdiction, legal standing, filing deadline, and evidence concerning the impact of alleged violations on vote results. The Court positioned itself as a court of result by emphasizing the existence of a direct and significant relationship between violations and changes in election results. Such considerations strengthen legal certainty through strict procedural requirements, consistency in applying legal norms, limited jurisdiction, and the finality of decisions. From the perspective of justice, the decision demonstrates a stronger emphasis on procedural justice because correction of election results depends heavily on the Applicant’s ability to establish the concrete and measurable impact of the alleged violations. The decision reflects a formalistic-positivistic approach to constitutional adjudication oriented toward maintaining the stability of election results while simultaneously demonstrating the need to balance legal certainty with substantive justice.