Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Differences in the Parsing of the Present Tense Verb in Qur’anic Verses in Order to Develop Arabic Language Skill Huda, M. Nurul; Holilulloh, Andi; Mustaqim, Abdul; Patah, Akhmad; Ahmed, Essam Mustafa
Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jba.v8i2.10993

Abstract

This research aims to expose the meanings, and the difference in the structure of the present tense in the frequent Qur’anic readings with an explanation of the impact of this difference in the noble verse, and it aims to provide correct linguistic models that contribute to building the linguistic ability of the students. The methodology was followed in this research, and this research included an introduction, a methodology section, result and discussion, and the last is conclusion. As for the introduction, it defined the subject of the research, the reasons for its selection, its objectives, the method used, the basic rule, previous studies, and the study plan. It focuses on linguistic analogy, meaning of harf jarr, linguistic skills, its definition and methods of obtaining. The present tense verb is preceded by harf lām and atf that considering the lām as a reasoning. It is not a condition for the present tense to be in the accusative case that the lam be clear in its reasoning. The lam and atf has function in the present tense verb “to be made” was read with the kasra of the lam and the accusative, and with the sukun of the lam and the jazm in the context of al-fi’l al-mudhari’, and it is clear that the reading of the kasra of the lam and the accusative was directed by considering the lam for the reasoning and the accusative of “to be made” with (that) is implicitly permissible.
ADOPSI POLA PUISI ARAB JAHILI DALAM AL-QUR’AN (PENDEKATAN ILMU AL-‘ARŪḌ) Patah, Akhmad
Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 1 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1156.402 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/ajbs.2017.01102

Abstract

In the Qur'an, there are many verses which employ one of the 16 patterns of the classical Arabic poetry metres, which in ‘Aruḍ are called baḥr (plural: buḥūr). All the patterns of the metres are applied in the Qur'an. However, these patterns are not put into practice consistently, and this inconsistency becomes the peculiarity of the Qur'an that distinguishes it from poetry. This paper specifically discusses the verses that applied the patterns as well as the specificity. Utilizing the scientific approach of ‘Aruḍ, this paper shows that although the Qur'an adopts the patterns of the poetry metres, there are at least three fundamental differences between the Qur'an and poetry. Therefore, the Qur'an can not be classified as poetry.
CACAT QĀFIYAH DALAM PUISI UMRU’ AL-QAIS (KAJIAN PUISI PERSPEKTIF ILMU Al-QAWĀFI) Patah, Akhmad; Ni'mah, Umi Nurun
Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 6 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajbs.2022.06202

Abstract

In general, the quality standard of classical Arabic poetry refers to the formulation of Al-Khalil bin Ahmad al-Farahidi, i.e Ilmu al-‘Arūd̩ wa al-Qawāfī. Even though these standards are so mainstream, in fact, some of the poetry of classical poets do not always live up to those standards, even the poetry of the great ones. This paper focuses on this, especially in terms of qāfiyah (rhymes of poetry), by taking the case of Umru' al-Qais poems as an example. The question that is then attempted to be answered is: how can a qualification be standardized when in fact, it is not fully followed by poets, even the great ones? The results of the discussion show that there are two possibilities. First, how the poets assessed the quality of poetry is different from how al-Farahidi did. Second, Al-Farahidi only took the abundant data available as what to be standardized in a theory.