Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.109
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kosmik Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Arief Suryono
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Perkembangan Historis Konsep Hardship dan Implementasi Nilai-Nilainya di Indonesia Mahesa Pangestu; Arief Suryono
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v3i2.3037

Abstract

Contract law recognizes the concept of force majeure as a mechanism to address extraordinary circumstances that hinder the performance of obligations, namely unforeseen events beyond the debtor’s control that may result in the release or suspension of obligations. However, this concept has limitations, as it does not encompass situations such as economic or monetary crises. In the development of international contract law, the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016 (UPICC) introduce the concept of hardship as a response to fundamental changes in circumstances that affect the economic equilibrium of the parties. Although hardship has not been explicitly recognized in Indonesian law, it is considered more relevant for addressing such conditions.This study aims to examine the historical development of the concept of hardship and to analyze the implementation of its underlying values in Indonesian legal practice. The method employed is normative legal research, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that, despite the absence of explicit regulation within the national legal system, the values of hardship have been reflected in several court decisions through approaches grounded in fairness and contractual adjustment.The implication of this study is that the concept of hardship has the potential to be explicitly adopted into Indonesian contract law in order to fill existing legal gaps and provide a more adaptive solution to changing circumstances, particularly in addressing economic or monetary crises that fall outside the scope of the force majeure regime
Penyelesaian Sengketa LPBBTI dan Peran OJK dalam Perlindungan Pemberi Dana Nur Indah Widyastari Nuvikho; Arief Suryono
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67434/ijssh.v6i2.2587

Abstract

This study examines dispute resolution mechanisms available to lenders against operators of Information Technology-Based Joint Funding Services (LPBBTI) that fail to disclose required funding information, as well as the role of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in resolving such disputes. The research employs a normative legal method using statute, case, and comparative approaches. Findings reveal that OJK Regulation No. 40 of 2024 does not comprehensively regulate dispute resolution mechanisms for compensating formal and/or material losses suffered by lenders due to operators' failure to fulfill disclosure obligations. OJK's authority is limited to imposing administrative sanctions without any mechanism for restoring lenders' rights. These findings are analyzed through preventive and repressive legal protection theory and compared with U.S. peer-to-peer lending regulation under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Supreme Court Decision No. 1206 K/Pdt/2024, ordering OJK to develop comprehensive consumer protection regulations, further underscores the urgency of reform. This study recommends revising POJK No. 40 of 2024 to integrate compensation mechanisms, alternative dispute resolution, and mandatory guarantee funds for LPBBTI operators. Keywords: Dispute Resolution, Lender Protection. LPBBTI, OJK.
KAJIAN YURIDIS MALPRAKTIK DOKTER BERDASARKAN HUKUM PERDATA Arief Suryono
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2012)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v12i1.781

Abstract

Sifat hubungan hukum antara pasien dengan dokter adalah berdasarkan persetujuan/perjanjian dalam upaya untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum antara pasien dengan dokter, khususnya Hukum Perdata. Hal ini telah diatur berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Sifat hubungan Hukum Perdata memberikan perlindungan hukum yang sejajar antara pasien dengan Dokter. Hubungan hukum antara Pasien dengan Dokter melahirkan Perjanjian Terapeutik yang melahirkan hak dan kewajiban antara Pasien dengan Dokter. Sehingga apabila tidak dilaksanakan akan menyebabkan terjadinya Malpraktek. Malpraktik dapat terjadi apabila dokter pada waktu memberikan pelayanan kesehatan kepada pasien tidak sesuai dengan standar profesi dan standar prosedur operasional. Akibat malpraktik apabila menimbulkan kerugian bagi pasien, maka dokter bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian tersebut. Baik berupa kerugian materiil dan atau im-materiil. Kata kunci: Kajian Yuridis, Malpraktik, Hukum perdata.
Co-Authors Alya Rosana Andien Muarifah Primawati Callysta Qabil Elisabeth Dian Aprilliani Fantika Setya Putri Heridadi, Heridadi Imtihani, Hajar Jagad Rahma Widanti M.Bagas Hutama P Mahesa Pangestu Meka Aszuri Rahmayani Muhammad Nasser Nabila Aida Farhana Lubdin Nadia Putri Ibtisamah Nisrina Nur Latifa Nur Indah Widyastari Nuvikho Nurul Oktaviani Putri Intan Ayuningutami Rahma Selina Yustika Yanti Rakha Fadhillah Salsabila Jasmine Briliana Putri Salwa Salsabila Wibawa Tri Agus Suswantoro