Articles
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Mazhab Mufassir Terhadap Perbedaan Penafsiran ]]>
<![CDATA[Atabik, Ahmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities Vol 2, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Walisongo Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (628.852 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21580/jish.21.2516
<![CDATA[This article explores the influence of aqidah and fiqh mazhab or sect in different interpretations. The interpreters prefer using the word ikhtilaf to be juxtaposed with interpretation. Ibnu Taimiyah mentions an article ikhtilaf al-salaf fi al-tafsir in the book Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir and the other scholars' works. The interpretation difference is divided into two parts, variative difference (tanawwu') and contradictory disputes (tadad). Both of those interpretation difference forms occured among the scholars, but in terms of difference (contradictory) quantity is relative small. In this article, it is found that mazhab mufassir often influence their interpretation result. Affiliation of mazhab fiqh is very influencial on an interpreter's interpretation. The affiliation of kalam also influences a mufassir in interpreting the verses of the Qur'an. The influence of this difference leads to various interpretation and enriches the scientific treasures in Islamic religion.* * *Artikel ini mengeksplorasi tentang pengaruh mazhab aqidah dan fiqih dalam perbedaan penafsiran. Para ahli tafsir lebih memilih penggunaan kata ikhtilaf untuk disandingkan dengan penafsiran. Semisal, Ibnu Taimiyah menyebut sebuah pasal ikhtilaf al-salaf fi al-tafsir dalam kitab Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir, serta karya ulama-ulama lainnya. Perbedaan penafsiran dibagi menjadi dua bagian, yakni perbedaan variatif (tanawwu’), dan perselisihan kontradiktif (tad}a>d). Kedua bentuk perbedaan penafsiran itu, terjadi dikalangan para ulama, namun dari segi kuantitasnya perbedaan (kontradiktif) relatif kecil. Dalam artikel ini, ditemukan bahwa mazhab mufassir seringkali mempengaruhi hasil penafsirannya. Afiliasi terhadap mazhab fiqih sangat berpengaruh pada penafsiran seorang penafsir. Begitu juga, afiliasi terhadap mazhab kalam juga sangat mempengaruhi seorang mufassir dalam menafsirkan ayat-ayat al-Qur’an. Sehingga, pengaruh perbedaan ini menyebabkan banyaknya penafsiran yang beragam dan memperkaya khazanah keilmuan dalam agama Islam.]]>
<![CDATA[EPISTEMOLOGI HADIS: Melacak Sumber Otentitas Hadis ]]>
<![CDATA[Atabik, Ahmad]]>
<![CDATA[ RELIGIA Vol 13 No 2: Oktober 2010 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Pekalongan ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (178.068 KB)
|
DOI: 10.28918/religia.v13i2.182
<![CDATA[Quran and Hadith have different historical side. This different implicates the differences of science development affiliated with them. One of them, that are very significant, is their link from the period of the prophet Mohammad to us. Quran as the first source of Islamic teaching –no doubt– comes to us by tasalsul or tawâtur (handed down from person to person for generations). Hadith, on the other hand, if it is examined carefully, has only little that is tawâtur, and most of them can be said as Hadith âhâd. In this paper, I will try to examine the epistemological side of Hadith. How to know its link from the Prophet to us? Certainly, a tool that is able to bridge and examine the problems around the first source or the Prophet period that is out of our coverage is needed. I give some suggestions to know it. Two of them are the isnâd or sanad system and the concept of tawâtur. The existence of sanad and its tawâtur, will, of course, clarify the position of the text or the source of Islamic teaching is really from the Prophet as a messenger.]]>
<![CDATA[FAKTOR IBU YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN PRAKTIK PEMBERIAN ASI EKKLUSIF DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS PAMOTAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Atabik, Ahmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Public Health Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Unnes Journal of Public Health ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang in cooperation with Association of Indonesian Public Health Experts (Ikatan Ahli Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia (IAKMI)) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (324.41 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujph.v3i1.3534
<![CDATA[Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui Mengetahui faktor ibu yang berhubungan dengan praktik pemberian ASI eksklusif di wilayah kerja Puskemas Pamotan Kabupaten Rembang tahun 2012. Jenis penelitian ini Explanatory Research dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Sampel berjumlah 58 ibu menyusui. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuesioner. Analisis data dilakukan secara univariat dan bivariat (Chi-Square). Hasil penelitian ini adalah ada hubungan antara pengetahuan ibu (p=0,021), tingkat pendidikan ibu (p=0,001), dan kondisi kesehatan (p=0,013) dengan praktik pemberian ASI eksklusif. Tidak ada hubungan antara pekerjaan ibu (p=0,706) dan umur ibu (p=0483) dalam praktik pemberian ASI eksklusif. Saran untuk ibu sebaiknya lebih aktif mencari informasi tentang pentingnya memberi ASI eksklusif, guna meningkatkan pengetahuan agar dapat menyusui anaknya secara eksklusif. Selain itu diharapkan dapat mengubah persepsi tentang pemberian makanan tambahan saat bayi berusia sebelum 6 bulan itu tidak benar. Bagi pelayanan kesehatan diharapkan memberikan informasi tentang pentingnya memberi ASI eksklusif kepada bayi umur 0-6 bulan.]]>
<![CDATA[PERCAMPURAN BUDAYA JAWA DAN CINA: Harmoni dan Toleransi Beragama Masyarakat Lasem ]]>
<![CDATA[Atabik, Ahmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Sabda: Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan Vol 11, No 1: 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (274.901 KB)
|
DOI: 10.14710/sabda.11.1.1-11
<![CDATA[This article explores the fact of harmony and religious tolerance values of the culture assimilation of Tionghoa ethnic dan local people in Lasem. Tionghoa ethnic have lived in Lasem since XI Century. Their existence bear new culture and plurarity for Lasem people that leads to a religiocity and social harmony within the people. The harmonius relation is proven when their both fight against Dutch Collonials in Lasem. The harmonious and tolerance of Lasem moslems can be seen in the interaction of the local people and the newcomer (Tionghoa ethnic), whether they are muslim or not]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Mazhab Mufassir Terhadap Perbedaan Penafsiran ]]>
<![CDATA[Atabik, Ahmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities Vol 2, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Walisongo Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (628.852 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21580/jish.21.2516
<![CDATA[This article explores the influence of aqidah and fiqh mazhab or sect in different interpretations. The interpreters prefer using the word ikhtilaf to be juxtaposed with interpretation. Ibnu Taimiyah mentions an article ikhtilaf al-salaf fi al-tafsir in the book Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir and the other scholars' works. The interpretation difference is divided into two parts, variative difference (tanawwu') and contradictory disputes (tadad). Both of those interpretation difference forms occured among the scholars, but in terms of difference (contradictory) quantity is relative small. In this article, it is found that mazhab mufassir often influence their interpretation result. Affiliation of mazhab fiqh is very influencial on an interpreter's interpretation. The affiliation of kalam also influences a mufassir in interpreting the verses of the Qur'an. The influence of this difference leads to various interpretation and enriches the scientific treasures in Islamic religion.* * *Artikel ini mengeksplorasi tentang pengaruh mazhab aqidah dan fiqih dalam perbedaan penafsiran. Para ahli tafsir lebih memilih penggunaan kata ikhtilaf untuk disandingkan dengan penafsiran. Semisal, Ibnu Taimiyah menyebut sebuah pasal ikhtilaf al-salaf fi al-tafsir dalam kitab Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir, serta karya ulama-ulama lainnya. Perbedaan penafsiran dibagi menjadi dua bagian, yakni perbedaan variatif (tanawwu’), dan perselisihan kontradiktif (tad}a d). Kedua bentuk perbedaan penafsiran itu, terjadi dikalangan para ulama, namun dari segi kuantitasnya perbedaan (kontradiktif) relatif kecil. Dalam artikel ini, ditemukan bahwa mazhab mufassir seringkali mempengaruhi hasil penafsirannya. Afiliasi terhadap mazhab fiqih sangat berpengaruh pada penafsiran seorang penafsir. Begitu juga, afiliasi terhadap mazhab kalam juga sangat mempengaruhi seorang mufassir dalam menafsirkan ayat-ayat al-Qur’an. Sehingga, pengaruh perbedaan ini menyebabkan banyaknya penafsiran yang beragam dan memperkaya khazanah keilmuan dalam agama Islam.]]>
<![CDATA[The Scientific Miracles of Olive (Zaitūn) in the Qur'an: Perspectives of Classic and Scientific Interpretations ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Atabik]]>
<![CDATA[ AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 5, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (420.05 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v5i2.2680
<![CDATA[Today, commentators use scientific interpretation to investigate various types of knowledge presented by the Qur’an, such as some modern commentators combine scientific studies of fruits cited in the Qur’an with their medicinal properties, such as olives (Olea Europea). According to Al-Baqi, there are at least 7 (seven) verses that mention ‘Zaitūn’ (olives), which are spread across seven different letters. The purpose of this article is to dissect the anatomy of classical and scientific interpretations of the olive fruit in the Qur'an. In the scope of library research, this study employed a thematic method that refers to the literature on commentary books, scientific miracles books of the Qur’an about fruits, and articles in reputable journals. According to the findings of this study, olives are known as the name of a blessed fruit that has advantages over other fruits in several interpretations of the Qur'an. There are various interpretations of the word ‘Zaitūn’; some argue that it refers to the location where many figs and olives grow, namely Jerusalem, where Prophet Isa was born and received revelation. Whereas, scientific interpretation reveals that olives are effective as herbal medicines capable of treating a variety of diseases such as treating the digestive tract in general (particularly the liver), lowering the risk of high blood pressure, treating joint problems in both hands, and lowering the risk of cancer.]]>
<![CDATA[Teori Makna dalam Struktur Linguistik Arab Perspektif Mufasir Masa Klasik ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Atabik]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Theologia Vol 31, No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21580/teo.2020.31.1.5631
<![CDATA[This article aims to examine the theory of meaning in the structure of Arabic linguistics that is studied by classical era commentators. In the classical era, the study that became a concentration of the study of al-Qur'an is the understanding of the meaning of the Qur'an with an Arabic linguistic approach. To get the ideal meaning from the verses of the Koran they pay attention to i’rab (Arabic grammar). They are concerned in the field of language criticism through grammatical, stylistic, and semantic approaches. Theories of meaning in classical times are supported by various works of classical Arabic linguists entitled Ma‘ānī al-Qur’ān, al-Farrā ’, al-Kisā’ī, al-Zajjāj, and al-Naḥḥās. These works are very significant in the development of the theorization of meaning from the point of view of the structure of the building (grammatical language). The theory of meaning is also supported by the study of stylistics (language style /uslūb). The study of the stylistic al-Qur'an in the theory of meaning is strengthened by al-Jā hiz and al-Jurjānī in their respective works. The final meaning theory can be found in the Qur'anic semantic studies. This study is considered as an ideal method in exposing the meaning of the Qur'anic language. Semantic studies of al-Qur'an are supported by the theory of al-wujūh wa al-naẓāir and siyāq (the context of the meaning of language). The study of the Wujūh and Naẓāir is a method of understanding the message of meaning which is possessed by the verses of the Qur'an, once studied by Ibn al-Jauzī. While siyāq is an indicator used in determining the meaning desired by mutakallim, it has been studied by Ibn Daqīq al-‘Id.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Mazhab Mufassir Terhadap Perbedaan Penafsiran ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Atabik]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities Vol 2, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Walisongo Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (628.852 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21580/jish.21.2516
<![CDATA[This article explores the influence of aqidah and fiqh mazhab or sect in different interpretations. The interpreters prefer using the word ikhtilaf to be juxtaposed with interpretation. Ibnu Taimiyah mentions an article ikhtilaf al-salaf fi al-tafsir in the book Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir and the other scholars' works. The interpretation difference is divided into two parts, variative difference (tanawwu') and contradictory disputes (tadad). Both of those interpretation difference forms occured among the scholars, but in terms of difference (contradictory) quantity is relative small. In this article, it is found that mazhab mufassir often influence their interpretation result. Affiliation of mazhab fiqh is very influencial on an interpreter's interpretation. The affiliation of kalam also influences a mufassir in interpreting the verses of the Qur'an. The influence of this difference leads to various interpretation and enriches the scientific treasures in Islamic religion.* * *Artikel ini mengeksplorasi tentang pengaruh mazhab aqidah dan fiqih dalam perbedaan penafsiran. Para ahli tafsir lebih memilih penggunaan kata ikhtilaf untuk disandingkan dengan penafsiran. Semisal, Ibnu Taimiyah menyebut sebuah pasal ikhtilaf al-salaf fi al-tafsir dalam kitab Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir, serta karya ulama-ulama lainnya. Perbedaan penafsiran dibagi menjadi dua bagian, yakni perbedaan variatif (tanawwu’), dan perselisihan kontradiktif (tad}ad). Kedua bentuk perbedaan penafsiran itu, terjadi dikalangan para ulama, namun dari segi kuantitasnya perbedaan (kontradiktif) relatif kecil. Dalam artikel ini, ditemukan bahwa mazhab mufassir seringkali mempengaruhi hasil penafsirannya. Afiliasi terhadap mazhab fiqih sangat berpengaruh pada penafsiran seorang penafsir. Begitu juga, afiliasi terhadap mazhab kalam juga sangat mempengaruhi seorang mufassir dalam menafsirkan ayat-ayat al-Qur’an. Sehingga, pengaruh perbedaan ini menyebabkan banyaknya penafsiran yang beragam dan memperkaya khazanah keilmuan dalam agama Islam.]]>
<![CDATA[KONTRADIKSI ANTAR DALIL DAN CARA PENYELESAIANNYA PRESPEKTIF USHULIYYIN ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Atabik]]>
<![CDATA[ YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 6, No 2 (2015): YUDISIA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v6i2.1363
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKThis article describes method in the study of ushul fiqh on contradictory dalil and the ways ushuliyyin solved this problem. In fact, there is no contradiction in the law, rather, sometimes mujtahid disputed over two arguments. Mujtahid of the classic era has been working in many ways to find solution of the problems. They are jam’u wa at-taufiq (comprise and compromise), tarjih (favor) and nasakh (abrogating). If al-jam’u is not possible to compromise among dalil, then mujtahid used tarjih (favoring one of them). However, should tarjih is impossible, then the last method is naskh, ie the first coming text is cancelled by the later one in chronological order. If they did not know which text came first, then tawaqquf was applied. ]]>
<![CDATA[PERNIKAHAN DAN HIKMAHNYA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Atabik]]>;
<![CDATA[Khoridatul Mudhiiah]]>
<![CDATA[ YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2014): Yudisia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v5i2.703
<![CDATA[In essence, marriage is a religious order that is governed by Islamic law and is the only authoritative sexual relations in Islam. As rahmatan lil ‘alamin, Islam has determined that the only way to meet the biological needs of individuals living just by marriage, marriage is one thing that is very interesting if we look more closely at the content of the meaning of this marriage problem. The Qur’an has explained that among the purpose of marriage is to find peace in one’s life both for men and women (litaskunu ilaiha). Islam ordained marriage as a vehicle of family to achieve happiness in life. Therefore, in this article, the author explores the notion of marriage, the legal basis, as well as the terms and harmonious marriage’s wisdom that prescribed.Keywords: marriage, Saqinah, law and Islam]]>
