Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.218
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum Diponegoro Law Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Unram Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Belo Journal of Judicial Review Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 38 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

 1 
Non-Penal Countermeasures Efforts in Supporter Conflict (Study on PSIM vs Persis Conflict) Laras Astuti; Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya; R.B Sularto
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p02

Abstract

The conflict between PSIM Yogyakarta and PERSIS Solo supporters is a conflict that has been going on for a long time. These conflicts often cause casualties and damage to public facilities. Severe sanctions do not frighten supporters and a deterrent to take anarchic actions. To overcome this, preventive efforts (non-penal) can be used as an alternative in resolving supporter conflicts. Through socio-legal research, this paper aims to find out more about non-penal countermeasures based on an analysis of the factors that cause supporter conflict. The results of the study, it is known that non-penal countermeasures can be done by emphasizing the efforts of the supporter development process as part of the criminal politics of prevention without punishment. The coaching process is based on three factors that cause supporting conflicts, namely based on the nature, position of the actors, and diversity of society. The police and supporter also have a strategic role in preventing criminal acts to minimize the occurrence of clashes between supporters. These roles include providing security personnel, conducting sweeping, and coordinating between related parties.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perusahaan Teknologi atas Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas oleh Pengemudi Ojek Online Ratna Kumala Sari; Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (626.357 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p03

Abstract

Act No. 22 the year 2009 about Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (road traffic and transportation) raises perspectives in criminal law regarding criminal liability for public transportation companies. Furthermore, it raises problems on how criminal liability of technology companies for traffic accidents and how law enforcement practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe the criminal liability of technology companies for traffic accident by online motorcycle taxi drivers and for criticizing law enforcement. Normative research methods will be used to answer the problem. There are two approaches to assess the problem, namely case approach the and law approach. The conclusion is that technology companies can be criminally accounted for by the vicarious liability perspective and the Road Traffic and Transportation Act. Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (UULLAJ) memunculkan perspektif dalam hukum pidana menyangkut pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi perusahaan angkutan umum. Selanjutnya memunculkan permasalahan mengenai bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana perusahaan teknologi atas tindak pidana kecelakaan lalu lintas dan bagaimana praktek penegakan hukumnya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan mengenai pertanggungjawaban pidana perusahaan teknologi atas tindak pidana kecelakaan lalu lintas oleh pengemudi ojek online dan untuk mengkritisi penegakan hukumnya. Metode penelitian normatif yang akan digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan ini. Terdapat dua pendekatan untuk mengkaji permasalahan ini yaitu pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan undang-undang. Dari hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa perusahaan teknologi dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana dengan perspektif vicarious liability dan Undang-Undang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rofiq Ariza Hasna Asiyah Jamilah Brian Septiadi Daud Candra Ulfatun Nisa Chairizka Sekar Ayu Dimas Indianto Wahyudi Duwi Aryadi Dwi Putri Hardiani Dwientha Ayu Pratjna Handri Kristanto Hari Sutra Disemadi Hari Sutra Disemadi Jeremia Ganesh Jeremy Emmanuel Khilmatin Maulidah Laras Astuti Lina Dwi Istiqomah Meysasi Kirana Resa Nanik Riyanti Nur Rochaeti Pujiyono Pujiyono Pujiyono Pujiyono R Bondan Agung Kardono R.B Sularto Rahmadia, Fitriani Ratna Kumala Sari Roni Gunawan Raja Gukguk Wenny F Limbong*, Eko Soponyono, Umi Rozah, Wenny F Limbong*, Yoga Nugroho