Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Enhancing Resilience in Indonesian Firms: Integrating ERM, Organizational Ambidexterity, and Strategic Renewal Post-COVID-19 Budi Chandra; Teddy Jurnali; Sheila Septiany
Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan Vol. 13 No. 6 (2025): JIAKES Edisi Desember 2025
Publisher : Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37641/jiakes.v13i6.4114

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally disrupted global business environments and intensified uncertainty, compelling firms to rapidly adapt their strategies and capabilities to maintain resilience and competitiveness in increasingly volatile and complex markets. This study aims to investigate the mediating role of strategic renewal in the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms, enterprise risk management, organizational ambidexterity, and firm performance. Using a sample of firms in Indonesia, the proposed model was tested employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Data were obtained through questionnaires distributed to respondents, with a total of 377 valid responses used for the analysis. The findings reveal that enterprise risk management, as a governance mechanism, significantly enhances firm performance directly, while organizational ambidexterity also has a significant direct effect on firm performance. Additionally, organizational ambidexterity shows a significant positive relationship with strategic renewal, which in turn significantly impacts firm performance. These results underscore the critical importance of strategic renewal in amplifying the benefits of governance-based dynamic capabilities such as enterprise risk management and organizational ambidexterity for performance gains. This study highlights the need to integrate governance and dynamic capabilities through continuous strategic renewal processes to sustain competitive advantage in rapidly changing business environments, offering valuable insights for both academics and practitioners.
Does Family Ownership Weaken Corporate Carbon Performance? Septiany, Sheila; Jurnali, Teddy; Suparman, Meiliana; Wati, Erna; Intany, Neza
Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) Vol 18, No 1 (2026): JURNAL ASET (AKUNTANSI RISET) JANUARI-JUNI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jaset.v18i1.96347

Abstract

This study investigates whether family ownership affects carbon performance among publicly listed firms in Indonesia.  The study uses 451 firm-year observations from 2019–2023 from firms that consistently disclose sustainability information. Panel data regression was applied, and robustness is assessed using Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM).  The results show that family ownership has a negative and statistically significant effect on carbon performance, indicating that stronger family control is associated with weaker carbon performance and environmental accountability. This suggests that family-controlled firms prioritize internal stability and socioemotional considerations, which reduce incentives for transparent reporting and external scrutiny. However, some family firms may still achieve lower emissions through tighter internal monitoring despite limited disclosure quality.  These findings extend agency theory and socioemotional wealth theory by highlighting how ownership concentration shapes sustainability behavior in an emerging-market context. Practically, regulators and firms should strengthen board independence, enhance sustainability oversight, and encourage standardized carbon performance frameworks such as GRI 305 to improve transparency and credibility.  The novelty of this study lies in examining the under-researched relationship between family ownership and carbon performance in Indonesian listed firms, thereby enriching the corporate governance and sustainability literature.
Audit Opinion, Big4, Auditor Narcissism and CEO Narcissism: Drivers of Reporting Timeliness Septiany, Sheila; Jurnali, Teddy; Egnes, E; Suparman, Meiliana; Harsono, Budi
Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) Vol 17, No 1 (2025): JURNAL ASET (AKUNTANSI RISET) JANUARI-JUNI 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jaset.v17i1.78465

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the influence of audit opinion, Big4, auditor narcissism and CEO narcissism on timeliness. A sample of 138 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2018 to 2022 was analyzed using annual financial reports. The study employed statistical analysis with the Stata application to measure the effects of these variables on timeliness, calculated as the number of days between the fiscal year-end and the audit report date. The findings reveal that audit opinion and auditor narcissism have a significant negative effect on timeliness, indicating their role in accelerating audit report completion. Conversely, Big4 firms and CEO narcissism do not significantly impact timeliness, suggesting a more nuanced relationship between leadership traits and audit timing. These results highlight how varying characteristics influence the punctuality of financial reporting, a crucial factor in stakeholder decision-making. The study contributes to agency theory, signaling, and the upper echelons perspective by offering insights into how personality traits and audit practices affect financial reporting timeliness. Practically, it provides guidance for companies to enhance reporting processes by understanding the traits that drive efficiency. The novelty lies in exploring the under-researched influence of CEO narcissism and auditor narcissism on audit timeliness, particularly in the context of public companies in Indonesia, thus enriching the literature and expanding practical applications in the audit field.