Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.597
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman JIA (Jurnal Ilmu Agama) UIR LAW REVIEW SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora AL-Hikmah: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama (JISA) WAJAH HUKUM DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Jurnal Pariwisata Terapan Momentum : Jurnal Sosial dan Keagamaan Journal of Islamic Civilization TARLIM : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM Law, Development and Justice Review MIMBAR : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Politik Majalah Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pemikiran Keagamaan Tajdid The Journal of Society and Media Jurnal Socius: Journal of Sociology Research and Education Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (JPIPS) Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum Metafora: Education, Social Sciences and Humanities Journal Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI) Jurnal ISIP : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Edupedia: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Islam Majalah Ilmiah Tabuah: Ta`limat, Budaya, Agama dan Humaniora Sosietas: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Pemerintahan Jurnal Penelitian Agama Syiah Kuala Law Journal Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan Nuansa : Jurnal Studi Islam dan Kemasyarakatan Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan
Agus Machfud Fauzi
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW

 1 
Penolakan Masyarakat Terhadap Pengesahan Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Hesty Kartikasari; Agus Machfud Fauzi
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2021
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v4i1.4482

Abstract

AbstrakTujuan dari penulisan jurnal ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana respon masyarakat terhadap UU Cipta Kerja yang terlah disahkan oleh DPR RI. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu studi literatur. Hasil pembahasan menyatakan bahwa pengesahaan RUU yang disahkan dalam sidang Paripurna pada 5 Oktober 2020 menuai beragam reaksi dari masyarakat. Banyak elemen masyarakat yang tidak setuju dengan pengesahaan UU Cipta Kerja tersebut. UU Cipta Kerja dinilai tidak memihak pada masyarakat terutama kaum buruh. Beberapa pasal dalam UU Cipta Kerja dinilai merugikan kaum buruh. Salah satunya mengenai uang pesangon dan nilai santunan yang diturunkan. Banyak masyarakat yang kontra dengan pengesahaan UU tersebut. Masyarakat, terutama yang berasal dari elemen buruh dan mahasiswa melakukan aksi demo di berbagai wilayah untuk menolak pengesahaan UU Cipta Kerja. Di Sidoarjo demo dilakukan oleh para buruh dan mahasiswa di depan gedung DPRD Sidoarjo pada Kamis 8 Oktober 2020. Beberapa elemen mahasiswa turun ke jalan dan mendatangi gedung DPRD dan menyampaikan tuntutan penolakan atas pengesahaan UU Cipta Kerja.Kata kunci: Pengesahan, UU Cipta Kerja, MasyarakatAbstactThe purpose of writing this article is to find out how the public responds to the UU Cipta Kerja which has been legalized by the Indonesian Legislative Assembly. The data collection technique that being used literature review. The results of the discussion stated that the ratification of the RUU which was passed in Sidang Paripurna October 5, 2020, attracted various reactions from the public. Many elements of society expressed their with the passage of the UU Cipta Kerja. UU Cipta Kerja is considered to be impartial to the community, especially the workers. Several articles in the UU Cipta Kerja are considered to be detrimental to workers. One of them is regarding severance pay and lowered compensation value. Many people contravene the legalization of the law. The community, especially those from labor and student elements, held demonstrations in various regions to reject the ratification Creation of the UU Cipta Kerja. In Sidoarjo a demonstration was held by workers and students in front of the Sidoarjo DPRD building on Thursday, October 8, 2020. Several student elements took to the streets and came to the DPRD building and submitted demands for rejection of the ratification of the UU Cipta Kerja.Keyword: legalized, UU Cipta Kerja, Society
Demo Penolakan RUU Cipta Kerja dalam Kacamata Teori Konflik Sosiologi Ferdi Gultom; Agus Machfud Fauzi
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2021
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v4i1.4868

Abstract

RUU Cipta Kejra is part of the Omnibus Law in the ratification of many verses which are in the context of controversy. The ratification of the RUU Cipta Kerja invites conflict between workers and the government. Both parties experienced collisions, which resulted in demonstrations on 8-10 October. The demonstration involved workers and students. The demonstration was also chaotic because of the elements who carried out acts of fandalism. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the rejection of the RUU in the View of Sociological Conflict Theory. So this paper will discuss how the demonstration was carried out from a sociological perspective, particularly in sociology of law through conflict theory. This paper uses the literature study method, which data sources come from secondary sources obtained through news sources, articles, journals, and books. Then from the data obtained, it is processed and analyzed using Conflict Theory. The results of this study were demonstrations caused by conflicts between students and workers and the government. There are several factors that led to the demonstration, namely, First, communication between workers and the government. Second, there is a change in the balance in society where the workers are threatened by their human rights. Third, interests. Fourth, there is pressure from the past or unresolved problems, where the reserves of workers are not fulfilled.
Co-Authors Adinda Ajeng Apriliana Agnesia Midiana Akbar Mawlana Alissa Septania Damayanti Amarul Ilham Rizky Andini Nurrahmah Dewi Anggita Ayu Triana Aniq Ifadah Anisa Rusdianasari Arizki Dwi Prasetyo Ayu Wulaningsih Delia Intan Hidayah Dinda Ayu Aprilianti Dinda Mirtanty Fandi Ahmad Fahrurozi Farid Pribadi Fathur Rozy Fatimah Aulia Rahma Ferdi Gultom Fransisca Aprillia Hesty Kartikasari Iin Erlina Eka Putri Ike Dewi Purwanty Indira Devi Anggraeni Jeudi Aneigia Branchais Junaidi Junaidi Karinina Anggita Farrisqi Khoridatus Sa’adah Liesmay Dwi Kurniawati Luki Ricard Maliha, Novi Fitia Maulana Firdaus Ferdiansyah Maya Sajidah Salsabila Melanda warsetiyo putri Millena Apriliani Rusadi Mochamad Taufiqurrachman Moh Mudzakir Mohamed Omar Abdulrahim Mohammad Alfin Mahbi Awaludin Mohammad Fajrul Falah Mustofa Mustofa Nanda Tri Ifkinil Wulandari Nathan Marcellino Naufalul Ihya Ulumuddin Nina Karerina Nuria Febri Rahayu Nurul Azizah Prabowo Yudho Pratama Aditya Ramadhan Rachmad Febriansyah Ridho Akbar Prakoso Ridho Tri Winisudo Ridwan Arma Subagyo Ristanti Indrayaningtias Riyandha Dwi Saputra S, Muh. Rizal Salsabila Athaya Fauzi Sejati Ayuning Arisholina Shara El Fani Sustianing Solicha Taufiqurahman Arsy Ramadhani Yunia Mulia Irianti