Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)

Profile of Problem-based Learning (PBL) Model Assisted by PhET to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of High School Students in Dynamic Electrical Materials Nabila Rahmadita; Husni Mubarok; Binar Kurnia Prahani
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 7 No. 4 (2021): October
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v7i4.799

Abstract

This study discusses the implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) assisted by physics education technology (PhET) as a virtual laboratory to improve the critical thinking skills of high school students on dynamic electrical materials. The purposes of this research were to obtain the profile of students' critical thinking skills and the implementation of PBL assisted by PhET in senior high schools. This research method was a preliminary study with a qualitative descriptive analysis, written tests, student response questionnaires, and teacher interviews. The finding of students' critical thinking skills was categorized into three levels (low, moderate, and high). There are seventeen students in the low category, fifty-three students in the moderate category, and thirty students in the high category. The conclusion of this study revealed that students' critical thinking skills at the senior public school Surabaya were in the moderate category, and training questions were needed to improve students' critical thinking skills
Explore Students' Metacognitive Thinking Process in Solving Compound Polarity Problems Based on The Level of Academic Ability Himatul Aliyah; Erman; Djoko Hartono; Husni Mubarok
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 9 No. 11 (2023): November
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4293

Abstract

This study was designed to identify and describe students’ metacognitive thinking process in solving compound polarity based on academic ability level. Two hundred and eighty-four high school students in Indonesia participated in the study. Students are classified into high, middle and low academic ability groups based on field notes, student academic data, compound polarity problem-solving test (CPPST) scores and teacher suggestions. Six selected students from each group were designated as research subjects and then interviewed in depth to explore their metacognitive thinking processes. CPPST answer sheets and interview transcripts were analyzed using summative content analysis and tested for validity by data triangulation. The results showed that the students with high and medium academic ability level carry out metacognitive thinking processes in the dimensions of planning, monitoring and reflection in solving compound polarity problems, where the metacognitive thinking processes of students with high academic ability are more varied than students with middle academic ability. Students with low academic ability only carry out the dimensions of planning and monitoring. Therefore, teachers need to train students' metacognitive skills in solving problems and get used to applying metacognitively in each given problem solving so that students are trained to solve problems systematically, carefully and thoroughly, and manage time properly in order to obtain the expected learning achievement.
Explore Students' Metacognitive Thinking Process in Solving Compound Polarity Problems Based on The Level of Academic Ability Himatul Aliyah; Erman; Djoko Hartono; Husni Mubarok
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No 11 (2023): November
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4293

Abstract

This study was designed to identify and describe students’ metacognitive thinking process in solving compound polarity based on academic ability level. Two hundred and eighty-four high school students in Indonesia participated in the study. Students are classified into high, middle and low academic ability groups based on field notes, student academic data, compound polarity problem-solving test (CPPST) scores and teacher suggestions. Six selected students from each group were designated as research subjects and then interviewed in depth to explore their metacognitive thinking processes. CPPST answer sheets and interview transcripts were analyzed using summative content analysis and tested for validity by data triangulation. The results showed that the students with high and medium academic ability level carry out metacognitive thinking processes in the dimensions of planning, monitoring and reflection in solving compound polarity problems, where the metacognitive thinking processes of students with high academic ability are more varied than students with middle academic ability. Students with low academic ability only carry out the dimensions of planning and monitoring. Therefore, teachers need to train students' metacognitive skills in solving problems and get used to applying metacognitively in each given problem solving so that students are trained to solve problems systematically, carefully and thoroughly, and manage time properly in order to obtain the expected learning achievement.