Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Borneo Administrator: Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Inovasi Sistem Administrasi Negara Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik JIPAGS (Journal of Indonesian Public Administration and Governance Studies) Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP) Journal of Governance Jurnal Public Policy Jurnal Ranah Publik Indonesia Kontemporer (Rapik) Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Sciences
Leo Agustino
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Governance

 1 
Policy Analysis of Handling COVID-19: Experience China, South Korea, Italy, and Indonesia Leo Agustino; Harits Hijrah Wicaksana
Journal of Governance Volume 5 Issue 2
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v5i2.8683

Abstract

This article discusses and analyzes efforts to treat the coronavirus (also known as Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19)) by the governments of China, South Korea, Italy, and Indonesia.  To understand the approaches each country takes is very important to get a clear picture of the efforts, steps, strategies, and policies that are formulated and implemented. To analyze COVID-19 cases in the four countries, the governance analysis framework (GAF) approach from Hamza (in Putra and Sanusi 2019) was used. This approach analyzes four aspects: scope map, stakeholder map, process map, and governance map.  Articles utilizing a qualitative approach using descriptive analysis research methods. Data collection techniques used are library studies in the form of books, journal articles, online and conventional news, and the websites of authoritative institutions.  Several important findings are general and specific, including, first of all, the four countries have the same orientation in handling and controlling the spread of the coronavirus.  Secondly, various actors are actively involved in resolving a pandemic starting with the highest leadership of a country, medical staff and nurses, security agencies, researchers, and so on.  Third, the four countries take their respective ways in solving the COVID-19 problem, but generally, they do a lockdown in addition to the health approach. Fourth, China and South Korea are considered successful examples in handling COVID19, otherwise not with Italy and Indonesia.  The lack of success in Italy and Indonesia is caused by two factors, the lack of seriousness of the government and ignorance of citizens, resulting in slow handling of control and widespread of the deadly coronavirus.
Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: The Experience of The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Leo Agustino; Indah Fitriani; Harits Hijrah Wicaksana; Ahmad Daelami
Journal of Governance Volume 6 Issue 2: (2021) December
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v6i2.12126

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the discussion and analysis of corruption eradication attempts in Indonesia with the Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), The Corruption Eradication Commission) as its centre. As an activity, the commencement of the corruption eradication dates to the pre-Reformation Era. However, its presence is mainly in the form of the foundation of the anti-corruption body without playing real roles as a nominal anti-corruption institution. As a response towards pressure from the IMF, in 2002 the Corruption Eradication Commission was formed as a specialized institution to tackle chronic corruption issues strangling Indonesia in the era of Soeharto’s New Order. Unfortunately, since its inception, there has been no president who is committed to the eradication attempts and therefore sided with the KPK. It is due to the commission’s huge constitutional power (investigation, probing, tapping, arrest, and prosecution) and hence these frighten many corrupt officials. Numerous political elites have been arrested by the KPK such as ministers, governors, regents, mayors and law-enforcers top officials. Consequently, unsurprisingly the KPK faces multi-directional attacks attempting at its weakening through the arrests of its top leaders, iterating its ad-hock (can be dissolved at any time.) status, and the revision of KPK law. Therefore, the government should act firmly to provide protection and supports to the KPK against those potential threats aiming at weakening the commission, to block any legislation potentially lessening the functions of the KPK, and to make sure both KPK’s top leaderships and average personnel are impartial and free of vested interests.
Co-Authors Affan Sulaeman Ahmad Daelami Amjah Amjah Arenawati Arenawati Aura Dian Marta Auradian Marta Badrul Azmier Mohamed Desi Marlina Indah Fitriani Ipah Ema Jumiati Ismanto Lia Apriliani Rahmawati Ratna Wurjandari Suwaib Amirudin Utang Suwaryo Wicaksana, Harits Hijrah Wilansari Wilansari