Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Pencatatan Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Perkawinan Campuran Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Perlukah Pengesahan dari Pengadilan? Raja Hamnan, Nauval; Budi Cahyono, Akhmad
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2351

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas kepastian hukum dalam pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan setelah adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Dengan latar belakang pentingnya perkawinan dalam kehidupan manusia dan kompleksitas hukum yang timbul dalam perkawinan campuran, penelitian ini mengkaji keabsahan perjanjian perkawinan, mempertimbangkan apakah perjanjian perkawinan membutuhkan pengesahan melalui lembaga peradilan (Pengadilan Agama/Negeri) atau cukup pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam bentuk akta otentik. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif, dengan menggunakan daftar pustaka yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian memperlihatkan terkait meskipun perjanjian perkawinan di bawah tangan sah menurut Pasal 1313 KUHPerdata, mereka menghadapi tantangan dalam hal kekuatan dan kepastian hukum. Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 memperluas pemahaman tentang perjanjian perkawinan, mengakui perjanjian pasca-nikah, dan peranan pengadilan dalam pengesahan dari suatu perjanjian perkawinan pada kasus tertentu. Saran dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kesadaran dan edukasi hukum tentang pentingnya pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam bentuk akta otentik dan peranan pengadilan dalam menilai keabsahannya, guna memastikan kepastian hukum dan mengurangi risiko sengketa hukum.
Analysis of TheVadility of A Cession Over A Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement That Was Subject to an Invalid Novation Fabiola, Bella; Cahyono, Akhmad Budi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i1.1904

Abstract

In order to guarantee smooth capital turnover, banks would often "withdraw" their capital even if the receivables (often from credit) that they currently own are not yet payable, by selling their receivables, followed by cession. However, in practice this is often problematic. Most of the problems revolving around this practice is that the cession that follows the selling of receivables is conducted not in accordance with applicable laws regarding cession and could therefore backfire and become a problem for the bank in question. The cession of Permata Bank on Debt Assignment Deed (Cession) Number 85 dated 5 May 2017, as stated in the Central Jakarta Commercial Court Decision Number 131/Pdt.SUS-PKPU/2018/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst is one of such problematic cessions. On this matter, the assignment of receivables was done through Debt Assignment Deed (Cession) Number 85 dated 5 May 2017, related to a Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement that was novated and then amended. This article uses a normative juridical research method. The research specifications used in this study are descriptive analytical. The secondary data used by the author in this study consisted of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data analysis method used is normative qualitative. The Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement is carried out without the transfer of ownership with cession, so that the ownership has not yet been transferred to the buyer. The Novation and Amendment To the Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement is also invalid because it was carried out without involving the debtor. So, it can be concluded that the cession of the Conditional Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement which was later novated and amended is null and void because the cession was made under a receivables sale and purchase agreement that was invalidly novated. Key Words: Cessie, Novasi, Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement
The Urgency of Regulating the Rescission of Child Adoption: A Comparative Study on Upholding the Best Interests of the Child Nabila, Farradhisya Ririz; Cahyono, Akhmad Budi
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no3.4329

Abstract

The absence of specific regulations governing the cancellation of child adoption in Indonesia has created a legal vacuum that undermines the principle of the best interests of the child. This study aims to develop an ideal legal framework for adoption cancellation to prevent practices contrary to child protection principles. Using a doctrinal approach and a comparative analysis with the Philippine legal system, the research emphasizes the urgency of establishing clear regulations that prioritize the child’s welfare in every judicial decision. The proposed reform integrates Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence (UUPKDRT) and Government Regulation No. 54 of 2007 on the Implementation of Child Adoption to provide a comprehensive legal basis. Strengthening these instruments would ensure that violence by adoptive parents constitutes valid grounds for cancellation while safeguarding the child’s rights to continuous care, protection, and development before and after annulment.