Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Konstitusi JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Haniah Ilhami
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Relevansi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 dalam Upaya Mencegah Perkawinan Usia Anak Haniah Ilhami
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (586.084 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1723

Abstract

This research concludes that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 which mandates the legislators to revise the age-limit of marriage, is irrelevant in preventing child-age marriages. Indonesian marriage legal system continues to open up opportunities for deviations of the principle of age-limit of marriage  through Dispensation of Marriage. This research finds the juridical development on Dispensation of Marriage on the type of marriage requiring Dispensation of Marriage, the applicant of Dispensation of Marriage, the authority to provide Dispensation of Marriage, and the administrative requirements to submit the Dispensation. Based on these developments, several factors that cause irrelevancy of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 in preventing child-age marriages are the absence of specific requirements in the application of Dispensation of Marriage to the court, the existence of the Principle of Freedom in procedural law, the voluntary nature attached in the request for Dispensation of Marriage, as well as the extension of provisions of applicants who can submit an application to the court.
Child Protection Post the New Marriage Law: How Indonesian Religious Court Interpreting the Urgency in Child-age Marriage Ilhami, Haniah; Nugraheni, Destri Budi; Wijayanta, Tata
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054

Abstract

The amendment of the Law of Marriage in 2019 introduces the new concept of Dispensation of Marriage by providing some additional provisions: the obligations to provide the urgency of marriage and the specific supporting evidence in proving the urgency. This article aims to examine the interpretations of judges in Religious Court on defining the urgency of child-age marriage and the implementation of the supporting evidence in cases of Dispensation of Marriage. Based on the identification, the author analyzes the main questions about the protection of children's rights on those interpretations. Based on the normative legal research that examines the Rulings of Religious Court on the case of Dispensation of Marriage, this article uses the Nonprobability Sampling techniques, specifically the purposive sampling which refers to certain criteria, the author finds the inconsistencies in the interpretation of the urgency of marriage and the implementation of providing the supporting evidence, which influenced by 2 (two) factors,  the Formal Regulation and the principle of judge’s independence. As a result, the author suggests detailed regulations regarding the supporting medical evidence, as well as the improvement of comprehensive and equal understanding for judges about the concept of child protection. Comparing to previous studies, this article shows its originality through a broader object study and comprehensive research analysis with more emphasis on juridical aspect, therefore that arguments and conclusions are built on a strong analytical foundation.
Analisis Hukum terhadap Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Syari’ah Bank Wakaf Mikro di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Umam, Khotibul; Harahab, Yulkarnain; Ilhami, Haniah
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 52 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v52i2.555

Abstract

Abstract: This research focuses on analyzing the position of Sharia Micro Finance Institution – Bank Wakaf Mikro (Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Syariah-Bank Wakaf Mikro/LKMS-BWM) in positive law. Furthermore, this research explores the management and activities of LKMS-BWM in empowering micro-businesses in D.I. Yogyakarta. This is normative legal research and focused on analyzing secondary data, specifically all regulations related to Syariah Micro Finance Institution. The research uses Statutory Approach and Conceptual Approach. The results of this research were analyzed qualitatively. This research finds that: (1) The legal position of LKMS-BWM is an institution incorporated as a Service Cooperative and has a business license known as Sharia Micro Finance Institution; (2) Management and activities of LKMS-BWM in D.I. Yogyakarta involves various stakeholders consisting of donors, LAZNAS BSM UMAT, BWM, and Productive Poor Communities. Financing activities are given in the form of social contracts (qardh) at the first stage and a business contract (tijārah) at the next stage according to the fatwa (Islamic instructions of rules) DSN-MUI. Abstract: Artikel ini mengkaji dan menganalisis kedudukan LKMS-BWM dari perspektif hukum positif, serta tata kelola dan aktivitasnya dalam kaitannya dengan pemberdayaan usaha mikro di D.I. Yogyakarta. Ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian yang mendasarkan pada data sekunder, khususnya berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep serta analisis data kualitatif. Dari kajian dan analisis yang telah dilakukan diperoleh temuan bahwa: pertama, Kedudukan LKMS-BWM adalah lembaga berbadan hukum Koperasi Jasa dan memiliki izin usaha sebagai Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Syariah. BWM adalah branding bagi LKMS sehingga tidak mencerminkan substansi ditinjau dari ketentuan hukum positif, bahkan tidak semua aspek dalam koperasi dan LKM dapat dipenuhi oleh BWM. Kedua, dalam kaitannya dengan pemberdayaan usaha mikro di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, tata kelola dan aktivitas LKMS-BWM telah melibatkan berbagai stakeholders yang terdiri dari donatur, LAZNAS BSM UMAT, BWM, dan Masyarakat Miskin Produktif. Aktivitas pembiayaan diberikan dalam bentuk akad sosial (qardh) pada tahap pertama dan akad bisnis (tijārah) pada tahap berikutnya sesuai fatwa DSN-MUI.
Sole Custody and The Implication of Fault-based Divorce Under the Indonesian Legal System Hartini, Hartini; Ilhami, Haniah; Yusoff, Rahmawati Mohd
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Navigating Legal Landscapes: Exploring Justice Development in Indonesia and the
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4576

Abstract

This study analyses the reasons why most judges in Indonesia’s religious courts tend to rule in favour of the sole custody model over the joint custody model following a divorce, even though the state, through the Child Protection Act, has enacted regulations emphasizing the granting of child custody using the joint custody model. This study is an evaluative review of the dominant sole custody model decided in the Religious Court concerning the Indonesian divorce law system, which emphasizes that divorce must be filed for a reason. The study results show that the divorce law requiring divorce to be accompanied by a reason and adopted by the Religious Court makes Indonesia a country that adopts a fault-based divorce system. This impacts the contestation and efforts of one party to find fault with the other party through the proof process in the Religious Court. Furthermore, to show that one party is better and more moral, there is a struggle for child custody rights while affirming the presumption that the party winning child custody is the better and more moral party. This means that child custody is always given to one party, not to both parties. The Religious Court needs to consider the use of a no-fault divorce system for several reasons: (1) Islamic jurisprudence recognizes no-fault divorce, namely, divorce with khuluk (khul’), and (2) efforts not to defame the couple in court are more in line with Islamic teachings.
Between no-fault and fault-based: Has Indonesia consistently adopted the fault-based divorce law system? Hartini; Ari Hernawan; Dwi Haryati; Haniah Ilhami; Laras Susanti; Nur Yaumil Hikmah
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jhn.v16i2.30395

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: Under the Indonesian Marriage Law of 1974, the requirement of specific acceptable reasons for divorce underscores the adoption of a fault-based divorce system. However, of the Law also includes “continuous disputes and endless quarrels between the spouses with no hope of reconciliation” as grounds for divorce provided by the Elucidation of Article 39 paragraph (2) letter f, which mirrors the Western no-fault-based divorce concept of irreconcilable differences. This apparent contradiction is intriguing for a comprehensive analysis of which divorce system Indonesia aligns with. Purpose/Study Objectives: This article evaluates the contradiction between Indonesia’s fault-based divorce system and the existence of grounds for divorce, which include “persistent disputes and endless quarrels between the spouses with no hope of reconciliation.” This evaluation aims to confirm whether Indonesia has consistently adhered to the fault-based divorce law system. Design/Methodology/Approach: This article utilizes normative juridical research by examining secondary data as the primary source. The research began with identifying legal principles governing divorce, followed by analyzing the historical development of regulations and legal considerations in judicial decisions. The data were qualitatively analyzed using conceptual, statutory, case-based approaches to provide a critical perspective. Findings: This article reveals that the grounds of “persistent disputes with no hope of reconciliation” first appeared in 1933 under the Indonesian Christian Marriage Ordinance of 1933 under the terminology of onheelbare tweespalt. It was then adopted by the Marriage Law of 1974. Initially, all divorce reasons had to be grounded in the fulfilment of "persistent disputes with no hope of reconciliation," requiring the determination of the party most responsible for the breakdown of the marriage. However, this article concludes that there has been a gradual shift from necessitating identifying fault in "persistent disputes with no hope of reconciliation" to simply recognizing the marriage's breakdown without attributing blame. This ground is now independently sufficient to establish an irreparable breakdown of the marriage. Paper Type: Research Article.
Co-Authors Ari Hernawan Destri Budi Nugraheni Dwi Haryati Hartini Hartini Khotibul Umam Khotibul Umam Laras Susanti Nur Yaumil Hikmah S.Pd. M Kes I Ketut Sudiana . Tata Wijayanta Yoga Yuniadi Yulkarnain Harahab Yusoff, Rahmawati Mohd