Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.147
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BIOTIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi dan Kependidikan Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Bioedukatika Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education)
Bowo Sugiharto
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Integration of Local Wisdom in the Implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Policy in The Biology Education Study Programs in Indonesia: Analysis and Evaluation Bowo Sugiharto
BIOTIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi dan Kependidikan Vol 12, No 2 (2024): JURNAL BIOTIK
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/biotik.v12i2.25362

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the “Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM)” program in the Biology Education Study Program (BESP) on various campuses in Indonesia with a special focus on the integration of local wisdom. Data was collected from respondents in 44 study programs covering aspects such as campus status, accreditation, course repositioning, implementation of MBKM activities, and suggestions and recommendations for program improvement. The results of the analysis show that the majority of study programs at state campuses (75%) have repositioned the curriculum and implemented various forms of MBKM activities such as student exchanges (70.45%), internships/work practices (68.18%), and teaching assistance. The integration of local wisdom is emerging as an important aspect, with many study programs using local wisdom in academic activities and business product development, such as using traditional medicinal plants for health products. Key suggestions from respondents included the need for standardization of guidelines, financial assistance for students, periodic evaluations, and adjusting the curriculum to the needs of the times. Most study programs have ensured that MBKM activities follow the formulated Program Learning Outcomes (PLO), with 63.64% of study programs stating that they always ensure this suitability. However, there are still challenges in the process of recognizing MBKM activities into courses and integrating these activities into a thesis or final project, with 77.27% of study programs not carrying out this integration. The study concludes that although MBKM has been doing well, there is still room for improvement. There needs to be further efforts in terms of integrating local wisdom, financial support, and strengthening collaboration between educational institutions and local communities. Clear and standardized implementation of guidelines, as well as continuous evaluation, are essential to improve the effectiveness and benefits of the MBKM program.
Profile of High School Students' Arguments on Environmental Pollution Materials in the Covid-19 Era Yeni Puspitasari; Sri Widoretno; Joko Ariyanto; Bowo Sugiharto; Sri Dwiastuti; Candra Adi Prabowo
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 14, No 4 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1989

Abstract

The study aims to identify the argumentation profile of high school students in learning in the covid-19 era. This research is quantitative descriptive with a survey method. The research population was 172 students, with a sample of 72 students. Determination of the sample using cluster random sampling technique has a balanced quality from the results of the paired F test. The research procedure was carried out by collecting data on student answers from argumentative essay questions distributed via a google form. Argumentative questions based on TAP contain six components, namely Evidence (E), Warrant (W), Backing (B), Qualifier (Q), Rebuttal (R), and Claim (C). The argumentation scoring rubric is calculated based on the Patton-Pickle rule. Data analysis was carried out by interpreting the scores obtained by students on each argumentation component that showed the argumentation profile. Most of the students' argumentation profiles, according to their components, are in the very low category scores, namely 0.5 and 1. A score of 0.5 is obtained by comparing the percentages of students: E: E: W: W: B: Q: R: C: C: C by 23.61%: 1.39%: 0.00%: 52.78%: 45.83%: 83.33 %: 4.17%: 2.78%: 2.78%: 0.00% while the score of 1 is 41.67%: 55.56%: 83.33%: 47.22%: 54.17%: 8.33%: 75.00%: 83.33%: 79.17%: 98 ,61%. Scores were obtained due to various factors, including the learning process that was less meaningful, students' understanding and reasoning of the material was not in-depth, the generalization process of evidence or theory was not appropriate.
Improving Students’ Scientific Writing Skills through Discovery Learning in Science Learning: A Systematic Review Opik Prasetyo; Bowo Sugiharto; Harlita Harlita
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.6789

Abstract

Scientific writing skills are essential for students to express ideas or thoughts in various media such as practicum reports. This skills can be trained through the implementation of learning models that can empower science process skills, namely discovery learning. This study aims to analyse various articles related to the implementation of discovery learning models in science learning to improve students' scientific writing skills. This research is a systematic review with the PRISMA method using the keywords "discovery learning" and "writing skills" during the last 10 years. There are 7 articles via Scopus reviewed from 2013 – 2023. The results of the systematic review analysis showed that the implementation of the discovery learning model in science learning can improve students' scientific writing skills that consist of various aspect and criteria.  Students' learning activities in each syntax of discovery learning are suitable to empower each aspect of this skills. The systematic review of various articles on the implementation of the discovery learning model is expected to be a reference for science teachers, especially in learning biology to improve students' scientific writing skills.
Validity of Science Module Based on Problem Based Learning Multiple Representations to Improve Students' Higher Level Thinking Skills on the Topic of Acid-Base Siti Sholikhah; Sentot Budi Rahardjo; Bowo Sugiharto
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 4 (2025): April
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i4.10837

Abstract

The background of this research is the use of learning resources that have not been effective in improving students' higher-order thinking skills. This study aims to develop a science module, analyze its validity, feasibility, and effectiveness on higher order thinking skills. This research type of research and development (R&D) uses the 4D development model according to Thiagarajan (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The science module was validated by six validators. The effectiveness of the module is seen from the increase in the students' higher order thinking skills test scores from 36 student. Validity was analyzed using Aiken's V, while effectiveness was analyzed with N-Gain. In the validation level, the learning material expert validator obtained a score of 0.91 with the category “valid”, the presentation expert validator obtained a score of 0.88 with the category “valid”, the linguist validation obtained a score of 0.91 with the category “valid”, and the graphic expert validation obtained a score of 0.88 with the category “valid”. A feasibility value of 79.8 by teachers with a feasible category. The effectiveness results show that the module has an effect on students' higher order thinking skills  as evidenced by the N-Gain score of the experimental class of 0,63 with a fairly effective category while the N-Gain score of the control class is 0,55 with a less effective category. Thus, the developed e-module is declared valid, feasible, and effective.
Co-Authors Andri Tri Nugroho Ayu Dien Islamiyati Baskoro Adi Prayitno Candra Adi Prabowo Chandra Adi Prabowo Elma Rosalia Malinda Haifa Azizzah Harlita Harlita Ihrom Rosyadi Joko Ariyanto Jonanda Fattah Anugerah Kistantia Elok Mumpuni Maretania Arafa Maulidya Dwi Anggini Maulika Junia Mustika Rani Murni Ramli Nira Luthfiana Prima Nur Rochmah Candra Padmi Nurul Alifah Nurul Hidayati Opik Prasetyo Pradita Anggun Ciptaningrum Puguh Karyanto Rahmat Evendi Rezqi Rohmatika Sari Safila Safinatunnajah Auliananda Sentot Budi Rahardjo Siti Sholikhah Sri Dwiastuti Sri Widoretno Sunarni Sunarni Yeni Puspitasari Zul Afifa Yunitadewi Basuki