Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.144
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jambe Law Journal Undang: Jurnal Hukum Nagari Law Review Recital Review WAJAH HUKUM Literatus SELODANG MAYANG Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law JISOS: Jurnal ilmu sosial Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Yetniwati Yetniwati
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mechanical Engineering Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Recital Review

 1 
Prospek Cyber Notary Sebagai Media Penyimpanan Pendukung Menuju Profesionalisme Notaris Syamsir Syamsir; elita rahmi; Yetniwati Yetniwati
Recital Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Volume 1 Nomor 2 Juli 2019
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (613.214 KB)

Abstract

Legal Procedure in the Implementation of Cyber ​​Notary in the future is closely related to legal development, community development and the development of science and technology. The development of technology and information is a phenomenon that continues to grow, can hardly be balanced with the development of law. Notary is a certain position that runs the profession in legal services to the community, needs to get protection and guarantees in order to achieve legal certainty. The development of technology and information is characterized by the era of informatics technology that introduces cyberspace, namely with the presence of Interconnected networks (Internet), this communication does not use media such as paper and the actual pens in Law are a tool for legal actions. In the Notary Protocol, there are minuta deeds in the form of a collection of documents which are State Archives that must be stored and maintained by a Notary and can be used as evidence in the event of legal actions in civil law. Digitally documenting (storage media) and CCTV as supporting documents for legal actions in signatories Contract agreements and as a Notary Protocol can be done using a computer / device and / or a computerized system or using the Internet. Computers are human tools in completing daily work, both personal work, in government and private offices. Storage media tools / equipment for decoding archives that are currently and are still being used in the form of diisket, laser disk, CD, DVD, HD-DVD and Blu-Ray, Memory Card, Memory Card, Flashdisk. USB Flash Drive, Hard Disk, External Hard Disk, and storage of data / documents Archives online, known as Cloud Storage. CCTV can be used as a supporting document for legal actions in signatories to contract agreements and as a notary protocol, because CCTV can record activities that are being carried out in the form of a video record, can store documents electronically and can connect objects to one another.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum Oleh Pengadilan: (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor 227/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Mlg) Romavita Romavita; Yetniwati Yetniwati
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 2 Juli 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i2.18949

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the responsibility of the Notary to the deed which was declared null and void by the Court (Case Study of the Malang District Court Decision Number 227/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mlg). The results show that the Malang District Court Judge's Decision in Decision Number 227/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mlg cannot be separated from 3 (three) aspects, namely juridical, philosophical, and sociological. First, the juridical aspect of the Malang District Judge's Decision is irrelevant between the main cases in the decision. Second, the philosophical aspect does not fulfill the sense of justice, especially for Notary S who made the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement for the parties which was declared null and void by the judge. Third, the sociological aspect of the judge's decision can cause public confidence to decline in the existing judicial process. In Malang District Court Decision Number 227/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mlg, Notaries are not charged with any responsibility. In this case, the responsibility of the Notary is only limited to the order of the Judge ordering the Notary to submit to the Judge's Decision as stated in the decision. The notary only records what was stated by the parties/appearers and then poured it into the deed. A notary cannot be held responsible for a deed that is canceled due to a violation committed by one of the parties to the agreement. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pertanggungjawaban Notaris terhadap akta yang dinyatakan batal demi hukum oleh Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor 227/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mlg). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Malang dalam Putusan Nomor 227/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mlg tidak lepas dari 3 (tiga) aspek yaitu yuridis, filosofis, dan sosiologis. Pertama, aspek yuridis Putusan Hakim Negeri Malang tidak relevan antar pokok perkara dalam putusan. Kedua, aspek filosofis kurang memenuhi rasa keadilan, khususnya terhadap Notaris S yang membuat Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli bagi para pihak yang dinyatakan batal demi hukum oleh Hakim. Ketiga, aspek sosiologis putusan hakim dapat menyebabkan kepercayaan masyarakat menurun terhadap proses Peradilan yang ada. Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Malang Nomor 227/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mlg, Notaris tidak dibebankan tanggungjawab apapun. Dalam hal ini tanggung jawab Notaris hanya terbatas dengan perintah Hakim yang memerintahkan Notaris untuk tunduk pada Putusan Hakim yang tertuang dalam putusan. Notaris hanya mencatat apa yang dikemukakan oleh para pihak/penghadap lalu dituangkannya ke dalam akta. Notaris tidak bisa dimintai pertanggungjawaban terhadap akta yang dibatalkan karena pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh salah satu pihak dalam perjanjian.
Co-Authors Agustin Rifiana Amarru Muftie Holish Diana Amir Diana Amir Diana Amir Diana Amir Dwi Suryahartati Dwi Suryhartati Elita Rahmi Erika Natalina Br Ginting Faradiba Mivtahur Feny Adisti Hartati Hartati Hartati Hartati Hartati Hartati Herlin Noviyanti Iskandar Zulkarnain Lili Naili Meriyani Meriyani Muskibah Muskibah Pahlefi . Ratih Novitasari Romavita Romavita Sari Rahayu Sasmiar Sasmiar Syamsir Syamsir Taufik Yahya Yogha Octhanio Pratama