Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

Problematika Teori Hukum, Konstruksi Hukum, dan Kesadaran Sosial Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 9, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (999.422 KB) | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a8035

Abstract

This theoretical-normative study aims to determine the problematic use of legal theory and its impact on the construction of the law itself. This is very important because the construction of todays law has not created a social awareness of the law so that law enforcement becomes difficult. The discussion in this study raises several issues to be studied, such as; what is the dependencies pattern between law and social awareness? Then how to reconstruct them in the current of the Theory of Law? And the last is; what is the proper direction of legal creation? The results of this study conclude: First, the problem of alienation and distortion between law and society is just like an iceberg phenomenon because the main problem lies within the understanding theoritical of the law itself. Second, the relationship between law and social awareness is the dependence relationship, where the legal product must reflect social awareness so that the actualization of the law is accepted by society as its need. Third, discussing the correlation between law and society is not enough with normative thought (prescriptive), but also empirical (descriptive), so the theory of law plays a very important role to bring this multidisciplinary understanding back to normative thought that prescriptive. Fourth, the legal product which is not based on normative thought is very dangerous because it will be very liberal and far from social morality based on social values, thus there will be alienation and distortion between law and society, or in other words law does not reflect the social awareness.
Village Sovereignty in Dispute Resolution after Law No 6 of 2014 concerning Village Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 26, No 2, December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20190136

Abstract

The research was conducted in order to strengthen the position of the village as a form of social control institution in solving problems that is present in the village setting which began to disappear since the independence era. A descriptive-qualitative approach with a historical-normative method is used to find the concept of the village sovereignty, obtained from studies of primary and secondary legal data. The research aims to get a historical picture as a conceptual reflection and judicial basis for developing and legitimizing the village as the place for resolving disputes among the populace. Since the monarchy until the colonial era, the village was given the authority to solve the problems of its people independently, this authority is severed after entering the independence era. The government finally began to realize the importance of village as autonomous and independent through Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages and strengthened by Supreme Court Regulation; PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Mediation Process in the Court. Through the Regulation, the village head now has the authority to resolve the problems among its populace and create agreements regarding it. Hence, support from the government is needed to the respective village heads and the chosen delegates through regulation and mediation training
Village Sovereignty in Dispute Resolution after Law No 6 of 2014 concerning Village Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 26, No 2, December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.20190136

Abstract

The research was conducted in order to strengthen the position of the village as a form of social control institution in solving problems that is present in the village setting which began to disappear since the independence era. A descriptive-qualitative approach with a historical-normative method is used to find the concept of the village sovereignty, obtained from studies of primary and secondary legal data. The research aims to get a historical picture as a conceptual reflection and judicial basis for developing and legitimizing the village as the place for resolving disputes among the populace. Since the monarchy until the colonial era, the village was given the authority to solve the problems of its people independently, this authority is severed after entering the independence era. The government finally began to realize the importance of village as autonomous and independent through Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages and strengthened by Supreme Court Regulation; PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Mediation Process in the Court. Through the Regulation, the village head now has the authority to resolve the problems among its populace and create agreements regarding it. Hence, support from the government is needed to the respective village heads and the chosen delegates through regulation and mediation training
MENYOAL AKREDITASI PENDIDIKAN MEDIATOR OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG Muhammad Radhi Abdullah; Puthut Syahfarudin; Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.402 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i04.p07

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini yakni memberikan masukan kepada penegak keadilan khususnya Mahkamah Agung agar bisa mencetak mediator yang alami dan dapat menekan jumlah perkara dalam lingkup peradilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang mempunyai objek atas sasaran peraturan perundang – undangan dan bahan hukum lainnya. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa yang seharusnya menjadi solusi pada Lingkup Mahkamah Agung tentang diwajibkannya suatu proses mediasi untuk menekan jumlah perkara justru hal tersebut menjadi suatu kendala. Kewajiban yang telah ditetapkan oleh Mahkamah Agung yang mengharuskan mediator memiliki sertifikat menjadi salah satu kendala kekurangan mediator pada tingkat pertama (Pengadilan Negeri). Kekurangan tersebut justru menjadi kendala, mengingat perkara tiap tahun bertambah dan bertambah. Selanjutnya bahwa mediator yang diakui hanya yang telah mengikuti pelatihan sertifikasi mediator. Hal ini telah menyimpulkan bahwa kepada setiap manusia yang menjadi suatu pilar penting dalam masyarakat tidak diakui secara sah oleh Mahkamah Agung sebagai mediator yang dapat memimpin jalannya musyawarah (mediasi) yang sejatinya dapat menekan jumlah konflik pada tingkat dilingkup masyarakat. The purpose of this research is to provide input to justice enforcers, especially the Supreme Court, so that they can produce natural mediators and can reduce the number of cases within the scope of justice. The research method used in this writing is a qualitative research method. The type of research used in this research is normative, namely legal research which has the object of the objectives of statutory regulations and other legal materials. The result of this research is that what should be the solution in the scope of the Supreme Court regarding the necessity of a mediation process to reduce the number of cases is actually an obstacle. The obligation that has been determined by the Supreme Court that requires mediators to have a certificate is one of the obstacles to the shortage of mediators at the first level (District Court). This deficiency is actually an obstacle, considering the number of cases each year increases and increases. Furthermore, the only recognized mediators who have attended the mediator certification training. This has concluded that every human being who is an important pillar in society is not legally recognized by the Supreme Court as a mediator who can lead the course of deliberation (mediation) which can actually reduce the number of conflicts at the community level.
Problematika Teori Hukum, Konstruksi Hukum, dan Kesadaran Sosial Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 9, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (999.422 KB) | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a8035

Abstract

This theoretical-normative study aims to determine the problematic use of legal theory and its impact on the construction of the law itself. This is very important because the construction of today's law has not created a social awareness of the law so that law enforcement becomes difficult. The discussion in this study raises several issues to be studied, such as; what is the dependencies pattern between law and social awareness? Then how to reconstruct them in the current of the Theory of Law? And the last is; what is the proper direction of legal creation? The results of this study conclude: First, the problem of alienation and distortion between law and society is just like an iceberg phenomenon because the main problem lies within the understanding theoritical of the law itself. Second, the relationship between law and social awareness is the dependence relationship, where the legal product must reflect social awareness so that the actualization of the law is accepted by society as its need. Third, discussing the correlation between law and society is not enough with normative thought (prescriptive), but also empirical (descriptive), so the theory of law plays a very important role to bring this multidisciplinary understanding back to normative thought that prescriptive. Fourth, the legal product which is not based on normative thought is very dangerous because it will be very liberal and far from social morality based on social values, thus there will be alienation and distortion between law and society, or in other words law does not reflect the social awareness.
Dediametralisasi Living Law Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pasal 2 RKUHP Ahmad Rif'an; Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto
Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.315 KB) | DOI: 10.12928/adlp.v1i1.3555

Abstract

Living law dan kepastian hukum sering diposisikan sebagai sesuatu yang diametral atau berlawan, dimana living law dianggap tidak memberikan kepastian hukum karena sifatnya tidak tertulis. Namun, menjadi pertanyaan besar jika kemudian konsep living law diakomodir dalam hukum tertulis sebagaimana yang muncul dalam Pasal 2 RKUHP sehingga apakah konsep living law yang tidak tertulis namun diakomodir dalam sistem hukum tertulis dapat berkorelasi dengan prinsip kepastian hukum sebagaimana salah satu ciri hukum tertulis. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kedudukan Pasal 2 RKHUP dalam menjamin eksistensi living law sekaligus pelaksanaan prinsip kepastian hukum. Untuk dapat mengetahui hal ini, penelitian normatif  ini menggunakan pendekatan historis-normatif-konseptual dengan teknik analisa deskriptif dan kualitatif, terakhir adalah membuat kesimpulan secara preskriptif. Pokok permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana analisa Pasal 2 RKHUP dalam perspektif living law dan kepastian hukum serta bagaimana korelasi kedua perspektif ini dalam implementasinya? Hasilnya, living law sebagai memiliki legitimasi historis dan budaya tidak bisa dinegasikan, sedangkan kepastian harus dimaknai bahwa hukum itu benar-benar ditegakkan, terlepas dari hukum yang tertulis atau tidak tertulis. Pasal 2 RKUHP adalah upaya untuk mengakomodir living law dalam bingkai kepastikan penegakan hukumnya, dan dalam hal ini tidak ada pertentangan berarti antara living law dan kepastian hukum. 
MENAKAR “GEN” HUKUM INDONESIA SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM NASIONAL Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research takes a new term called “legal gene” to explain the historical map hereditary about legal model in Indonesia. The legal gene thinking method then combined with historical-normative method so that the prescriptive element can be obtained as the final result from this research. The final result concluded that the study of legal gene in Indonesia is still far from perfect, especially legal gene study which more systematic and comprehensive since kingdom period, colonial, until Indonesian Republic period. Things get more severe because the Government seems not serious taking this matter, thus the aftermath is the discourse and national legal development efforts always spinning around and not comprehensive. Furthermore, Common Law as the wealth of the nation often ignored even though Common Law is a good legal gene as a foundation to developing National Law. As an advice, Government needs to do more serious, systematic, and comprehensive efforts to conduct research and studies about legal gene in Indonesia thus becoming the main ingredient for national legal development. This is more urgent when Indonesia also entered the fourth industrial revolution / Industry 4.0.
A comparative assessment of digital platform worker protection in the EU and ASEAN Nur, Muhammad; Asmorojati, Anom Wahyu; Megawati, Megawati; Zuliyah, Siti; Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 31 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v31i2.29823

Abstract

The rapid rise of the digital platform economy, connecting workers with employers, has transformed labor markets globally. This paper explores the regulatory approaches and policies safeguarding digital platform workers in the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). While the EU demonstrates comprehensive labor protections, ASEAN's diverse economies present a tapestry of approaches. This analysis aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers, scholars, and stakeholders, shedding light on the evolving landscape of labor rights and the future of work in the digital age. This study uses a comparative research design to assess digital platform worker protection in the EU and ASEAN, highlighting differences, similarities, and emerging trends. It involves reviewing official documents and legislative texts from both regions to identify relevant policies and initiatives. This paper found that "digital labor" extends beyond the vast digital landscape, impacting various activities and transforming traditional tasks into digital processes managed by algorithms and automation. Platform workers in regions like the EU and ASEAN face challenges, including extended unpaid waiting times, lack of social security access, unpredictable earnings, and the downside of flexibility. The EU addresses these issues through comprehensive legislative efforts, emphasizing transparency, algorithmic oversight, and clear employment status definitions. In contrast, ASEAN's structure, based on consensus and voluntary cooperation, poses challenges. A binding regional agreement is challenging due to diverse socio-economic and cultural landscapes. Therefore, a non-binding declaration, supported by comprehensive guidelines, may offer a more practical approach. This declaration, symbolizing collective commitment, along with guidelines on best practices, could guide member states in tailoring their national policies to protect platform workers better.
Urgensi Lembaga Mediasi Desa sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa: Kasus Desa Wukirsari di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli; Wahyu Asmorojati, Anom
Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan
Publisher : Departement of Communication and Community Development Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22500/9202134212

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas masalah penting dalam pemerintahan desa, yaitu urgensi transformasi kelembagaan atas status dan kedudukan Kepala Desa dalam penyelesaian sengketa di antara warga desa. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menyoroti urgensi pelembagaan penyelesaian sengketa yang dijalankan oleh Kepala Desa menjadi Lembaga Mediasi Desa. Untuk itu, fokus pertama artikel ini adalah menelusuri status dan dasar hukum dari kelembagaan tersebut; kedua adalah memaparkan urgensi pembentukan kelembagaan tersebut sebagai mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa di antara warga desa; dan ketiga adalah membangun model atau sistem kelembagaannya yang sesuai untuk kondisi di desa Wukirsari. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif-empiris-konseptual dan data yang diperoleh dianalisis secara kualitatif kemudian disajikan secara deskriptif-preskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah Desa Wukirsari memiliki urgensi untuk membentuk Lembaga Mediasi Desa berdasarkan pertimbangan sosio-geografi yang dihadapi dan juga sebagai implementasi atas amanat ketentuan Pasal 26 ayat (4) huruf k Undang No. 6 tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Penelitian ini mengusulkan model Lembaga Mediasi Desa di Desa Wukirsari yang mencerminkan perimbangan antara unsur Pemerintah Desa dan Profesional sehingga dapat berjalan efektif dan efisien dalam penyelesaian perselisihan di antara masyarakat Desa Wukirsari.
Perlindungan Hukum atas Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dan Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Kampung Pitu Isdiyanto, Ilham Yuli; Putranti, Deslaely
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 15, No 2 (2021): July Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.231-256

Abstract

Masyarakat Kampung Pitu masih memegang tradisi dan budaya asal usulnya hingga sekarang, bahkan jumlah Kepala Keluarga yang tidak boleh lebih dari 7 (tujuh) juga masih bertahan hingga sekarang. Sebagai masyarakat tradisional yang khas, masyarakat Kampung Pitu memiliki berbagai macam bentuk Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) yang disisi lain hal ini perlu mendapatkan perhatian serius oleh pemerintah. Regulasi di Indonesia mengatur perlindungan EBT melalui UU No. 28/2014 tentang Hak Cipta, sehingga dapat menjadi perlindungan EBT masyarakat Kampung Pitu agar tetap lestari. Penelitian ini menjadi sangat penting karena tidak banyak masyarakat tradisional yang mempertahankan hak asal-usulnya di wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan pengumpulan data baik primer maupun sekunder yang diperoleh secara daring serta analisa deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasilnya, masyarakat Kampung Pitu dapat dikategorikan sebagai Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang memiliki hak identitas dan tradisional atas asal-usulnya sehingga harus dilindungi dalam pelestariannya. Walaupun tidak ada regulasi ataupun penetapan dari tingkat Pusat sampai Daerah terkait Kampung Pitu, namun Kampung Pitu sudah ditetapkan sebagai Warisan Budaya Takbenda sehingga menjadi dasar perlindungan.