Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies Journal of Arabic Language Learning and Teaching
Ahmad Arifin bin Sapar
University of Malaya
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PADANAN KOSAKATA ARAB DALAM AL-QUR’AN TERJEMAH VERSI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA Rika Astari; Yusroh Yusroh; Abdul Malik; Ahmad Arifin bin Sapar; Nurina Dyah Putrisari
Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies | Vol. 5 No. 1 June 2020
Publisher : IMLA (Arabic Teacher and Lecturer Association of Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (678.307 KB) | DOI: 10.24865/ajas.v5i1.190

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the differences in the concept of meaning between the translation of the Qur'an in the Indonesian and Malaysian versions and explain the factors that influence the differences in the concept of meaning. This is a qualitative study that employs library material analysis with enrichment from the interview. Several material objects used, such as the Al-Wafi  dictionary and Diwan dictionary, the quranic verses about women in the Malaysia Team of Islamic Progress (JAKIM), and Ministry of Religion RI in January 2017.  The difference in its meaning was analyzed by lexical decomposition.  It was concluded that the concept meaning of a word in Malaysian tends to be used in various contexts and has polysemy. The factors that influence of distinguishing in meaning concept are social, cultural, political, government policies. The translation of the Quran in the Malay language version tends to use the majazi expression and is more textual. The Indonesia translation of the Qur’an more contextual due to the influence of Islamic thought in Indonesia, which more moderate, tolerant, and accommodate local wisdom.
Arabic Speaking Class Student’s Perception Towards Oral Corrective Feedback Azwir Azwir; Ahmad Arifin Bin Sapar; Zulkhairi Zulkhairi; Muhammad Yasir
Journal of Arabic Language Learning and Teaching (JALLT) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Arabic Language Learning and Teaching (JALLT)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jallt.v4i2.520

Abstract

This study investigated university students' perceptions of oral corrective feedback (OCF) in Arabic speaking classes at State Islamic University Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh. Employing a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve purposively selected students from a cohort of seventy enrolled in Arabic speaking courses at an Islamic higher education institution in Indonesia. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis framework. The findings revealed that students unanimously perceived OCF as essential for their Arabic speaking development. Explicit correction emerged as the most preferred feedback type, particularly among lower-achieving students, while high-achieving students favored clarification requests that promote self-repair. Students' affective responses were shaped primarily by the timing and manner of delivery, with post-performance and collective feedback strongly preferred over mid-performance correction, which triggered anxiety and embarrassment. OCF was perceived to improve phonological accuracy, morphosyntactic precision, self-monitoring capability, and speaking confidence. The study recommends that instructors diversify feedback strategies according to learners' proficiency levels and prioritize supportive, post-performance delivery to maximize pedagogical effectiveness.
Co-Authors Abdul Malik Azwir Azwir Muhammad Yasir Putrisari, Nurina Dyah Rika Astari Yusroh Zulkhairi Sofyan