Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.418
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Widya Yuridika Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Legal Spirit LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Analisis Hukum Perspektif Hukum Media Bina Ilmiah
Imam Budi Santoso
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : LEGAL BRIEF

 1 
Legal Protection Of Persons With Disabilities In Education Ary Dwi Kurniawan; Imam Budi Santoso; Pri Pambudi Teguh
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (777.24 KB)

Abstract

Protection and guarantee of human rights are not only necessary for normal citizens but also for persons with disabilities, namely people who have physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory limitations. In reality, there are still many people with disabilities who are discriminated against in relation to the fulfillment of the right to education, employment, public facilities such as transportation, places of worship, places of entertainment, and equality before the law. The problem of this research is how are the efforts of the Karawang Regency government in fulfilling the rights of persons with disabilities in the field of education? What is the policy for educators to educate people with disabilities? Are there any differences that the Karawang Regency government applies in fulfilling the rights of persons with disabilities and children with special needs?
Study On Government Policy In Managing The Corona Disease Virus Pandemi 2019 (Covid-19) In Indonesia Budiman; Imam Budi Santoso; Holyness N. Singadimedja
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (854.105 KB)

Abstract

The current development of the Covid-19 pandemic is very worrying where there is an increase in special corona cases in Indonesia. This study aims to identify and analyze the policies taken by the government in handling the Covid-19 pandemic and the steps taken by the government to mitigate the impacts, especially the economic and social impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research is based on the legislation governing the handling and handling of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as an analysis of the concept of establishing these laws and regulations. The results of this study are in the context of handling Covid-19, starting with the government issuing a policy on Large-Scale Social Restrictions which refers to Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine. The implementing regulations are Government Regulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions, as well as the Presidential Decree on Health Emergencies. Until now, the government has issued a PPKM policy which is carried out regularly. To address the economic and social impact of Covid-19, the government has taken several policies, including: Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23/Pmk.03/2020 concerning Tax Incentives for Taxpayers Affected by the Coona Virus Outbreak; Regulation of the Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 /Pojk.03/2020 concerning National Economic Stimulus as a Countercyclical Policy for the Impact of the Spread of Corona Virus Disease2019; and Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2020 concerning Refocussing of Activities, Reallocation of Budgets, and Procurement of Goods and Services in the Context of Accelerating Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19).
Policy Of Specific Time Working Agreement (Pkwt) On Law Number 11 Of 2020 Concerning Creation Work In Welfare Perspective Social And Subjective Sutrisno; Imam Budi Santoso; Holyness N. Singadimedja
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (925.71 KB)

Abstract

There are two types of work agreement issues as regulated in the Manpower Act which qualifies work agreements, namely, a Specific Time Work Agreement (PKWT) and an Indefinite Work Agreement. Specific Time (PKWT) in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation in Social Welfare and Subjective Perspectives. This research was conducted using a normative juridical approach, namely an approach that focuses on research and studies through theories and legal principles, as well as legislation on employment, especially related to non-permanent workers (PKWT) as regulated in the Job Creation Act. the policy of Specific Time Work Agreements (PKWT) in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation in the perspective of social and subjective welfare related to the goals of labor development in Indonesia has not been achieved optimally, because workers still feel they are being treated unfairly. This PKWT status does not provide legal certainty and a sense of security for the right to work guaranteed by the State. This PKWT status if viewed from the aspect of social welfare does not reflect welfare because at any time the entrepreneur can terminate it without any guarantee of welfare for his life and if it occurs as a whole it will lead to poverty and the feasibility of a prosperous life as mandated by the constitution
Authority Of Bawaslu In Election Law Enforcement And Justice (Analysis Of Handling Of Election Administrative Violations Through Adjudication) Khoirudin; Imam Budi Santoso; Pri Pambudi Teguh
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1163.719 KB)

Abstract

One indicator of a democratic rule of law is general elections to ensure the sovereignty of the people, democratic elections are elections that run in accordance with the electoral legal framework. The implementation of elections has its own legal character, different from other laws, therefore, the legal framework for elections must be able to guarantee the rights of the people in elections, so that law enforcement and election justice can run upright and straight, leading to elections with integrity. In the electoral legal framework, Bawaslu is given more authority by the election law, in addition to being tasked with prevention and supervision, it is also given adjudication authority in resolving the process of handling election administrative violations. The research method that the author uses is normative juridical, primary, secondary and tertiary legal data sources, data collected through library studies and field studies, and analyzed by qualitative juridical. The results of the study show that the authority of Bawaslu in enforcing election law and justice is to take legal action in the election process if it is not in accordance with the election laws and regulations. Such legal actions can be constructive, namely law enforcement that allows to change and/or cancel decisions, and can be punitive, namely those that allow sanctions to be imposed on perpetrators of violations, the decisions issued by Bawaslu are binding on the parties. The Bawaslu adjudication mechanism is guided by Perbawaslu concerning the Settlement of Election Administrative Violations. KPU is obliged to follow up on Bawaslu's decision. If it is not followed up, the KPU can be reported to the DKPP, for violating the election organizer's code of ethics.
Legal Certainty on the Form of Outsourching Work Agreements Based on the Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration Number 19 of 2012 concerning Conditions for Submission of Part of the Implementation of Work to Other Companies Ghina Rahmania; Imam Budi Santoso; Holyness N. Singadimedja
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (867.984 KB)

Abstract

The falling economic condition has forced the government and business to be more creative in creating business climate, government has created the legal instruments for the development of the investment through business activities. On the other hand, business actors try to catch every single business opportunity available, for example to make efficiency to cut the operational expenses. Outsourcing system becomes the trend used by several companies. Many big companies hire their workers through this system. The problems occurred were the employment of the Regulation of Ministry of Labor and Transmigration No. 19 of 2012 concerning Terms on Distribution of Work Partly to Other Corporation; the legal protection for the oursourcing worker under the Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Labor jo Regulation of Ministry of Labor and Transmigration No. 19 of 2012 concerning Terms on Distribution of Work Partly to Other Corporation; the settlement to be taken by the government to protect the outsourcing workers. The method of research used in this was descriptive analytical specification in which the researcher described or illustrated a case that was analyzed with the laws using juridical normative method of approach. Stages of research used included library and field research. Data collecting technique was throudocument study and field study in the form of interview. The findings of the research concluded that both has violated Article 17 section (3) of the Regulation of Ministry of Labor and Transmigration No. 19 of 2012 in which both corporations did not place the outsourcing workers in supporting job, instead, they were posted for main job. The protection given by in general was similar namely health insurance, holiday allowance, overtime incentives. While at the other company, they gave one more incentives that was end of contract pension. The judgment of Constitutional Court No. 27/PUU-IX/2011 deciding in favour of the interest of the workers, ordered that every outsourcing worker should have their rights equal to the rights of the non-outsourcing workers. In addition, outsourcing company should count the working time into the guidance to determine the wages and other rights at the outsourcing companies including the transferof from the company receiving other works.
Co-Authors Aerlangga Bagus Setiawan Ahmad Julkipli Andika Dwi Yuliardi Anggita Yulistia Annisa Chaerani Ary Dwi Kurniawan Budiman Delia Surya Nur Anggraeni Elgi Hikmat Syah Febby Oktaviani Maulana Putri Ghina Rahmania Gita Yulia Rahayu Holyness Nurdin Singadimedja Karina Luana Pramesti Widodo Khoirudin M.Reza Pahlevi Muhamad Bilal . Muhammad Rusli Arafat Mutiara Komalasari Nindya Febrina Nurhapsari Nur Hasanah Siregar Oci Senjaya* Pri Pambudi Teguh Resti Ayu Sumadi Rizki Akbar Maulana Sandy Maldini Sutrisno Teuku Syahrul Ansari Widia Sari Yeremia Juan Dewata Zhafira Gitamo