Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.133
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Borneo Law Review Journal KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal)
Bambang Waluyo
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analysis Of The Urgency Of Proving Predicate Crime In Money Laundering Cases(Predicate Crime: Human Trafficking Crime) Kirana Ardhelia Putri; Bambang Waluyo
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v18i3.3183

Abstract

Not all crimes use the same evidentiary system, one of which is Money Laundering which uses a reverse evidentiary system and does not require proof of the predicate crime. Proving the predicate crime of Human Trafficking contradicts Article 69, as well as how the evidentiary mechanism in court creates legal uncertainty. The method used is the normative legal research method, with the technique or method of data collection used being library research. The results of this study are that there must be changes regarding the mechanism of proving TPPU, especially in establishing its predicate crime. In the trial process, of course, there is no need to wait until the proof of the predicate crime is completed and decided. The trial process for TPPU cases can still be carried out but does not set aside the tracing and proving of the predicate crime. Proving the predicate crime can also analyze various other financial flows, which cannot be proven or are missed in the proof of the TPPU case. Without proof, it will lead to misuse of Article 69 of Law Number 8 of 2010. The government should be able to change or revoke Article 69 of Law Number 8 of 2010 because it is often misinterpreted by law enforcement officers and used as a loophole by suspects.
Literasi Hukum Digital: Mitigasi Risiko Pencemaran Nama Baik bagi Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Atas: Digital Legal Literacy: Mitigating Defamation Risks for High School Students Handoyo Prasetyo; Bambang Waluyo; Subakdi Subakdi
PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 11 No. 6 (2026): PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/pengabdianmu.v11i6.12244

Abstract

Low digital legal literacy among high school students has led to high vulnerability to defamation charges. This community service initiative aims to mitigate such risks through a legal literacy dissemination method, specifically by producing scientific articles as a medium for independent public education. The primary focus of this study is to translate complex norms in the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and the new Criminal Code (KUHP) into practical mitigation guidelines for students. The results indicate that providing a knowledge infrastructure through scientific writing offers an authoritative reference for both students and guidance counselors in distinguishing between freedom of expression and criminal defamation. In conclusion, this asynchronous dissemination strategy effectively provides a sustainable preventive solution, unrestricted by space or time. This article serves as a practical guide to building students' digital legal resilience and protecting future digital footprints.
Co-Authors Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Alexandro Aldikan Matio Panjaitan Amanda Putri Kurniawan Debora Anggie Noviana Dewi Safitri Handoyo Prasetyo Kirana Ardhelia Putri Krisma Krisma Nadilla Arisandi Puja Rianida Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Subakdi Sulastri Sulastri