Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.589
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Jurnal Yuridis PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Borneo Law Review Journal KRTHA BHAYANGKARA JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Bambang Waluyo
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analysis Of The Urgency Of Proving Predicate Crime In Money Laundering Cases(Predicate Crime: Human Trafficking Crime) Kirana Ardhelia Putri; Bambang Waluyo
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v18i3.3183

Abstract

Not all crimes use the same evidentiary system, one of which is Money Laundering which uses a reverse evidentiary system and does not require proof of the predicate crime. Proving the predicate crime of Human Trafficking contradicts Article 69, as well as how the evidentiary mechanism in court creates legal uncertainty. The method used is the normative legal research method, with the technique or method of data collection used being library research. The results of this study are that there must be changes regarding the mechanism of proving TPPU, especially in establishing its predicate crime. In the trial process, of course, there is no need to wait until the proof of the predicate crime is completed and decided. The trial process for TPPU cases can still be carried out but does not set aside the tracing and proving of the predicate crime. Proving the predicate crime can also analyze various other financial flows, which cannot be proven or are missed in the proof of the TPPU case. Without proof, it will lead to misuse of Article 69 of Law Number 8 of 2010. The government should be able to change or revoke Article 69 of Law Number 8 of 2010 because it is often misinterpreted by law enforcement officers and used as a loophole by suspects.
Literasi Hukum Digital: Mitigasi Risiko Pencemaran Nama Baik bagi Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Atas: Digital Legal Literacy: Mitigating Defamation Risks for High School Students Handoyo Prasetyo; Bambang Waluyo; Subakdi Subakdi
PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 11 No. 6 (2026): PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/pengabdianmu.v11i6.12244

Abstract

Low digital legal literacy among high school students has led to high vulnerability to defamation charges. This community service initiative aims to mitigate such risks through a legal literacy dissemination method, specifically by producing scientific articles as a medium for independent public education. The primary focus of this study is to translate complex norms in the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and the new Criminal Code (KUHP) into practical mitigation guidelines for students. The results indicate that providing a knowledge infrastructure through scientific writing offers an authoritative reference for both students and guidance counselors in distinguishing between freedom of expression and criminal defamation. In conclusion, this asynchronous dissemination strategy effectively provides a sustainable preventive solution, unrestricted by space or time. This article serves as a practical guide to building students' digital legal resilience and protecting future digital footprints.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGANCAMAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK Hosea Geraldo; Bambang Waluyo
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 10 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v10i2.7097

Abstract

Pinjaman online merupakan tindakan peminjaman uang yang dilakukan melalui media internet. Pada umumnya pinjaman online dilakukan melalui website yang dikelola oleh lembaga financial technology untuk mendaftar sebagai debitur. Praktik pinjaman online sebenarnya sudah dikelola oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) yang tertuang dalam 77/POJK.01/2016. Namun faktanya banyak pinjaman online yang beroperasi tidak memiliki izin dari OJK. Sehingga berdampak pada praktik penipuan, pemerasan, dan pengancaman disertai kekerasan yang memanfaat informasi pribadi nasabah. Penelitin ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Penelitian ini mengacu pada Surat Putusan Nomor 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt. Utr yang diketahui bahwa: 1) Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Eletronik jo. Pasal 45B dan pasal 27 ayat. 2) Seharusnya sanksi yang diberikan kepada terdakwa dapat lebih berat, sebab dapat dikenakanan Pasal 311 tentang penghinaan, 294 tentang pengancaman, 378 tentang penipuan, dan 368 KUHP tentang pemerasan, Pasal 81 jo 82 ayat (3) Perpu No. 1 Tahun 2016 dan Pasal 76 UU No. 35 Tahun 2016. 3) Penegakan hukum terhadap tindakan pengancam yang dilakukan oleh desk collection sudah sesuai dengan perundangan yang berlaku. Kedepannya diharapkan juga Majelis Hakim dalam memutus perkara harus lebih mempertimbangkan fakta-fakta persidangan, unsur-unsur delik, dan pertimbangan berat ringannya tindak pidana dengan mengacu pada keadaan terdakwa dan kerugian korban.
Optimalisasi Kemanfaatan Riset Hukum bagi Upaya Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat yang Berkesejahteraan Handoyo Prasetyo; Bambang Waluyo; Binsar Jon Vic S; Subakdi Subakdi
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v6i3.12894

Abstract

Doctoral legal research often gets trapped in academic formality and lacks practical benefit for the public. This Community Service (PKM) activity aims to optimize the utility of legal research through educational dissemination on the axiology of philosophy of science and the enhancement of practical legal awareness among residents of Cilempuk Hamlet, Purwamekar Village, Karawang Regency. The implementation method employed a participatory educational approach comprising socialization, interactive presentation on the Trias Philosophy of Science (ontology, epistemology, and axiology as the crown of a dissertation), and an open legal discussion. The results indicated an increased public understanding regarding the significance of axiological value ("so what?") in law and legal research. Residents demonstrated an understanding of legal pluralism (written laws and unwritten/customary laws), internalized daily legal compliance such as traffic discipline and mutual respect, and strengthened national commitment rooted in religious values. This activity successfully transformed theoretical-philosophical concepts into practical legal awareness at the rural level to foster a prosperous community.
Juridical Analysis of Fundamental Considerations of The Judge on Defendant’s Attitude at The Trial Bayu Adi Rachmat; Bambang Waluyo
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i3.7313

Abstract

This research aims to determine the relevance of the principle of judicial independence in deciding or considering the judge's verdict on the defendant in criminal cases under trial. It also aims to identify the legal basis that judge used in delivering the verdict. This study used a normative research method, from various legal principles, legal systems, and statutory regulations. The specific case under investigation involved an issue of injustice that occurred during the trial, where the judge granted leniency to the defendant based on their courteous behavior during the trial. The focus of this research is on aspects that may be considered for leniency by the judge, one of which is the defendant's polite behavior during the trial. Polite behavior is not explicitly regulated in criminal law, making it necessary to further investigate the judge's considerations in granting leniency to defendants who behave politely during the trial. This research is based on Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning the judiciary.
Co-Authors Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Alexandro Aldikan Matio Panjaitan Amanda Putri Kurniawan Bayu Adi Rachmat Binsar Jon Vic S Debora Anggie Noviana Dewi Safitri Handoyo Prasetyo Handoyo Prasetyo Hosea Geraldo Kirana Ardhelia Putri Krisma Krisma Nadilla Arisandi Puja Rianida Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Subakdi Sulastri Sulastri