Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.012
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL SeMaRaK Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Bisnis Net : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Journal of Research and Publication Innovation Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Manajemen JURNAL RUMPUN MANAJEMEN DAN EKONOMI Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntasi dan Manajemen Indonesia(JEAMI)
SHELA INDAH SAVITRI
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA FISIK TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PT.TARAINDO ENERGI PERKASA Andri Setiawan; Shela Indah Savitri
JURNAL RUMPUN MANAJEMEN DAN EKONOMI Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Maret
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jrme.v3i2.8929

Abstract

This study examines the transformational leadership style and physical work environment on employee performance at PT. Taraindo Energi Perkasa, both partially and simultaneously. Employing a quantitative associative approach, it processes questionnaire data via SPSS version 23. The population comprises 60 employees, serving as the sample. Analysis techniques include instrument tests, classical assumption tests, regression, correlation coefficients, determination coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Findings reveal transformational leadership style positively and significantly impacts employee performance partially, with t-calculated (6.529) > t-table (2.002) and significance of 0.424 (42.4%), rejecting H0 and accepting Ha. The physical work environment also exerts a positive significant partial effect, t-calculated (6.305) > t-table (2.002), with 0.422 (42.2%) significance, accepting Ha and rejecting H0. Simultaneously, both variables positively and significantly affect performance, yielding the regression equation: Y = 1.951 + 0.469X1 + 0.466X2. F-calculated (45.824) > F-table (3.10), with 0.617 (61.7%) significance, rejecting H0 and accepting Ha. Recommendations urge leaders to adapt approaches, enhance lighting, and refine work programs and job descriptions to boost employee performance at PT. Taraindo Energi Perkasa.
PENGARUH PENILAIAN KERJA DAN WORK LIFE BALANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA CABANG JAKARTA JOGLO Aziz Saputra; Shela Indah Savitri
JURNAL RUMPUN MANAJEMEN DAN EKONOMI Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Maret
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jrme.v3i2.9060

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of work assessment and Work life balance partially and simultaneously on employee performance at PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia, Jakarta Joglo Branch. Using quantitative methods, with a population of 58 employees and a sampling technique using total sampling or saturated sampling, namely the entire population is used as a sample. From the results of statistical calculations, the Work Assessment variable (X1) has a significant effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y). This can be proven by the t-test value of the Work Assessment variable (X1) with a t count of 11.368 and a significance of 0.000. Because t count is smaller than t table (11.368> 2.003) and the significance is smaller than 5% (0.050) then Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected, it can be stated that Work Assessment (X1) has a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). There is an influence of Work life balance (X2) having a significant effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y). This can be proven by the t-test value of the Work life balance variable (X2) with a t count of 5.063 and a significance of 0.000. Because tcount is greater than ttable (5.063 > 2.003) and the significance is less than 5% (0.050) then Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected, it can be stated that Work life balance (X2) has a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). It is obtained that there is a significant influence between Work assessment and Work life balance on Employee Performance. Judging from the ANOVA values, the Fcount value is 329.841 while Ftable ( 0.05) for n = 55 is 2.77. So Fcount> from Ftable (0.05) or 329.841> 2.77, with a significant level of 0.000 because 0.000 <0.05, then it can be said that, Work assessment (X1), Work life balance (X2) and together have an effect on Employee Performance (Y).
Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fisik Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Pos Indonesia (Persero) Cabang Ciputat Kota Tangerang Selatan Ayu Fitria; Shela Indah Savitri
JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): April
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jiem.v4i4.9327

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the physical work environment and motivation on employee performance at PT Pos Indonesia (Persero) Ciputat Branch, South Tangerang City. The research employs a quantitative method with a survey approach. Data were collected through questionnaires using the Slovin formula, resulting in 62 respondents representing a population of 160 employees. Data analysis techniques include validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, regression analysis, correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination, and hypothesis testing.The results indicate that the physical work environment has a significant effect on employee performance, as evidenced by the hypothesis test where t-count > t-table (9.318 > 1.671). Motivation also significantly affects employee performance with t-count > t-table (9.101 > 1.671). Simultaneously, the physical work environment and motivation influence employee performance with F-count > F-table (60.672 > 4,004). The coefficient of determination is 67.3%, meaning that employee performance is influenced by the physical work environment and motivation by 67.3%, while the remaining 32.7% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study.    
Co-Authors Andri Setiawan Ayu Fitria Aziz Saputra Camelia Putri Iskandar Candra Edom Sibagariang Dede Abdurohman Devi Fitria Wilandari Elza Manurung Gabrile Gandy Meiseva Indra Januar Rukmana Irenne Putren Miko Bhayangkara Munarsih Munarsih Siti Sukaesih Syawaludin Tiara Safitri