Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Ilmu Hukum Prima Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Ipso Jure
Maria Kaban
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Urgensi Legalitas Pelaksanaan Lelang Online Melalui Media Sosial Instagram Cut Maidina Ananda Putri; Sutiarnoto -; Jelly Leviza; Maria Kaban
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2132

Abstract

The implementation of auctions through Instagram social media often does not provide legal certainty for the parties participating in the auction because many in its implementation are not in accordance with the regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning auction implemention guidelines. So that in its implementation can cause disadvantage for the parties carrying out the auction. The research used descriptive analytical juridical normative method. Primary data and secondary data were obtained from library research and field research. The result of the research shows that the legal status of the Instagram account @usedbapeofficial was not an official auction house because it did not meet the requirements as an auction house, which should be in the form of limited liability company and obtaining permission form the Minister. Legal certainty for the owner of the goods has been carried out by @usedbapeofficial in the form of the payment proceeds being transferred to only one account, namely Kenneth Lee’s account as the account owner but does not provide legal certainty regarding when the owner of the goods will receive payment for the goods he auctions, legal certainty for the auction winner has been provides in the form of information that is listed in accordance with the format filled in by the owner of the goods. Legal protection for the owner of the goods is given in the form of holding funds in the @usedbapeofficial account until the goods are received by the buyer, while for the auction winner the legal protection is in the form of preventive and repressive legal protection. The conclusion of this research is the legal status of Instagram account @usedbapeofficial is not an official auction house. Legal certainty for the owner of the goods and the auction winner has not been fulfilled because most of the implementation of the auction on the Instagram account @usedbapeofficial do not comply with the provisions in the regulations of the Minister of Finance Number 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning auction implementation guidelines. Legal protection for the owner of the goods provided by @usedbapeofficial in the form of money auction sales is accommodated in one account, while legal protection for the auction winner has not been fully fulfilled because in its implementation legal protection is not provided by @usedbapeofficial in full to the injured party. It is recommended to @usedbapeofficial to improve the auction procedure into a buying and selling account with an auction mechanism and register its business as a Limited Liability Company, it is suggested to the government to update the regulations governing auction activities through social media, especially Instagram.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS TANAH ADAT PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KARO Maria Kaban
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 3 (2016)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (351.598 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16691

Abstract

AbstractDisputes are inevitable. Disputes can occur in almost all aspects of life . In Karo communities, disputes are generally associated with the object of inheritance . Land as one of the objects of inheritance is considered to have  more value in Karo communities . Therefor  disputes that occur are usually associated with land ownership . Due to the disputes that happens is still in the realm Karo local law, then  Karo customary law and existing national laws should be taken into account.IntisariSengketa merupakan hal yang tidak terelakkan dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat. Sengketa dapat terjadi dalam hampir seluruh aspek kehidupan. Pada masyarakat adat Karo sengketa yang terjadi pada umumnya berkaitan dengan objek waris. Tanah sebagai salah satu objek waris dianggap memiliki nilai “lebih” dalam masayarakat adat Karo. Untuk itu sengketa waris adat yang terjadi biasanya berkaitan dengan kepemilikan tanah. Dikarenakan sengketa waris yang terjadi masih dalam ranah masyarakat adat, maka dalam penyelesaiannya juga tetap memperhatikan hukum adat dan hukum nasional yang ada.
Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Pembebasan Lahan Proyek Pembangunan Irigasi Batang Bayang Wiranda Sahara; Muhammad Yamin; Zaidar Zaidar; Maria Kaban
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 4 - April 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i4.152

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang penyelenggaraan pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan Irigasi Batang Bayang; proses penetapan ganti kerugian yang dilakukan panitia hingga menimbulkan gugatan dalam Putusan Nomor 32/Pdt.G/2020/PN Psb; dan analisis yang digunakan dalam penilaian ganti kerugian pengadaan tanah pembangunan irigasi Batang Bayang pada Putusan Nomor 32/Pdt.G/2020/PN Psb. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif bersifat preskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi pustaka dan studi lapangan. Hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa penyelenggaraan pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan Irigasi Batang Bayang telah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Proses penetapan ganti kerugian yang dilakukan panitia hingga menimbulkan gugatan dalam Putusan Nomor 32/Pdt.G/2020/PN Psb Dilakukan dengan proses penghitungan atau penilaian dalam mengadakan pembebasan tanah ganti kerugian yang mempunyai kewenangan dalam hal ini Tim Appraisal.Analisis yang digunakan dalam penilaian ganti kerugian pengadaan tanah pembangunan irigasi Batang Bayang pada Putusan Nomor 32/Pdt.G/2020/PN Psb dengan menentukan nilai tanah terhadap tanah yang akan diberikan ganti kerugian untuk pembangunan proyek dinilai belum merepresentasikan keadilan.
Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Hibah Tanah Di Bawah Tangan Perspektif Hukum Perdata Indonesia : (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2681/K/PDT/2015) Betty D. Laura Sihombing; Hasim Purba; Zaidar Zaidar; Maria Kaban
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 10 - October 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i10.238

Abstract

Perbuatan hibah sering menimbulkan permasalahan yang berujung pada sengketa antara penerima hibah dan ahli waris pemberi hibah seperti dalam Putusan Perkara No. 2681/K/PDT/2015. Perdebatannya adalah mengenai kekuatan surat penyerahaan tanah objek hibah tahun 1901 yang hanya berupa Surat Penyerahan Tanah atau surat di bawah tangan. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis kekuatan pembuktian surat hibah tanah di bawah tangan menurut hukum perdata dan analisa pertimbangan dan putusan hakim berkaitan dengan Surat hibah dibawah tangan dalam Putusan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa kekuatan hukum pembuktian hibah tanah dalam bentuk surat di bawah tangan berlaku terhadap orang yang untuk siapa hibah itu diberikan, sedangkan terhadap pihak lain, kekuatan pembuktiannya bergantung pada penilaian Hakim berdasarkan pembuktian bebas; Pertimbangan dan putusan hakim berkaitan dengan Surat hibah dibawah tangan tersebut telah memperoleh keyakinan hakim berdasarkan kekuatan pembuktian nya secara formil dan materil, sehingga putusan hakim telah merepresentasikan kepastian hukum karena tetap berlaku dan mengikat para tergugat dan penggugat serta tidak dapat ditarik atau dicabut kembali.
Juridical Review of the Process of Revoking a Civil Decision Lawsuit Based on Article 271 Rv in Decision Number 413/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn" Maria Kaban
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Ipso Jure - February
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/1fkgrr63

Abstract

Decision number 413/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn discusses the legal process for filing a lawsuit based on Article 271Rv. This case involved several parties, with the plaintiff filing to withdraw the lawsuit before the defendant gave an answer. The court stated that the action was in accordance with applicable legal provisions. The process of withdrawing the lawsuit in this case occurred before the lawsuit was read, at which point the judge stated that the withdrawal was not contrary to the law. The judge decided to grant the revocation and ordered the removal of the lawsuit from the register. In the context of Indonesian law, Article 271Rv is the main reference in handling the revocation of the lawsuit. This article allows the plaintiff to withdraw his lawsuit on condition that the withdrawal is carried out before there is a response from the defendant
Co-Authors Betty D. Laura Sihombing Cut Maidina Ananda Putri Hasim Purba Jelly Leviza Muhammad Yamin Lubis, Muhammad Yamin Sutiarnoto - Wiranda Sahara Zaidar Zaidar