Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.147
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat AL-Daulah Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Lex Renaissance Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Belo Jurnal Suara Hukum Jurnal JURISTIC (JuJUR) Notary Law Research Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial
Kholilur Rahman
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pengaruh Opini Publik di Media Sosial terhadap Independensi Hakim dalam Memutus Suatu Perkara (Perspektif Rule of Law dan Rule of Ethics) Rahman, Kholilur; Suryoutomo, Markus; Islam, Muhammad Saiful
Jurnal JURISTIC Vol 6, No 02 (2025): Jurnal JURISTIC
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jrs.v6i02.6499

Abstract

The current digital era, the use of social media has proliferated, where many people use social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or other media to express their opinions. Moreover, as stated in Article 28 E of the 1945 Constitution, freedom of expression has been guaranteed by law that everyone has the freedom to associate, assemble, and express opinions. This study will discuss the impact of public opinion through social media on the integrity of judges in making decisions (in the perspective of the rule of law and the rule of ethics). Because, in principle, judges must, of course, be based on relevant facts and legal rules that are used as a juridical basis in making decisions. Not being swept away in public opinion and/or not being influenced by issues that develop on social media because unfair decisions will have an impact on the judiciary and the people who are affected by the decision. So, in this case, the profession of judges is tied to the rule of law and the rule of ethics, which basically aims to maintain the dignity of judges and the nobility of the profession of judges. The research method used is normative, using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches.
DINAMIKA KEJAHATAN DUNIA MAYA MENGENAI ONLINE CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION DI TENGAH PANDEMI COVID-19 Arifin, Samsul; Rahman, Kholilur
Al-Daulah : Journal of Criminal Law and State Administration Law Vol 10 No 2 (2021): (December)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Tatanegara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/ad.v1i1.19812

Abstract

Sekarang ini seluruh dunia tengah mendapati ancaman Pandemi COVID-19, kondisi demikian telah mengganti sikap sosial anak serta remaja yang ditutup sekolahnya lebih banyak menghabiskan waktu secara online. Perubahan sikap ini berdampak pada bidang kriminalitas ataupun kejahatan dunia maya, khususnya dalam bentuk eksploitasi seksual baru yang berkembang saat ini dengan memanfaatkan sarana internet. Bentuk eksploitasi seksual baru tersebut disebut sebagai online child sexual exploitation yang terindikasi semakin merebak di tengah Pandemi COVID-19. Selain itu, Salah satu permasalahan yang muncul adalah tidak konsistennya penggunaan istilah atau terminologi terkait eksploitasi seksual anak secara online, sehingga berdampak pada kesulitan dalam penegakan hukum (law enforcement). Oleh karena itu, artikel ilmiah ini bermaksud untuk menguraikan dan menjelaskan mengenai terminologi dan karakteristik online child sexual exploitation dalam perspektif hukum positif, serta identifikasi dinamika kejahatan dunia maya mengenai online child sexual exploitation di tengah Pandemi COVID-19.
The Urgency of the Confidentiality Principle in Restorative Justice Mechanisms Rahman, Kholilur; Lestari, Arum Ayu; Suryoutomo, Markus
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the legal issues that is interesting and rarely receives attention in the application of restorative justice is the confidentiality principle. In international provisions, it is regulated in Paragraph 14 of the United Nations Basic Principles and in Paragraph 2 of the Council of Europe Recommendation. In several countries, such as the United States, Belgium, and others, it has attracted the attention of legal scholars. In contrast, research in Indonesia has yet to adequately address or explore this principle in detail. Accordingly, it is both relevant and necessary to investigate the significance of this principle within restorative justice mechanisms. The discussion begins with an exploration of the underlying legal rationale (ratio legis) behind the principle of Confidentiality in models of restorative justice, followed by an analysis of the urgency of reformulating restorative justice provisions within the Indonesian criminal justice system in a way that guarantees this principle. This study employed a normative legal research method, supported by several approaches, including the statute approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of both primary and secondary legal sources. The main contribution of this research lies in its role as part of the law that ought to be (ius constituendum) for the reform of criminal procedure law in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abraham Sridjaja Budi, Kukuh Pramono Islam, Muhammad Saiful Jamil Jamil Lestari, Arum Ayu M Djalil Markus Suryoutomo Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma Putra Pratiwi Ayu Sri D Samsul Arifin