Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

DINAMIKA KEJAHATAN DUNIA MAYA MENGENAI ONLINE CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION DI TENGAH PANDEMI COVID-19 Arifin, Samsul; Rahman, Kholilur
Al-Daulah : Journal of Criminal Law and State Administration Law Vol 10 No 2 (2021): (December)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Tatanegara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/ad.v1i1.19812

Abstract

Sekarang ini seluruh dunia tengah mendapati ancaman Pandemi COVID-19, kondisi demikian telah mengganti sikap sosial anak serta remaja yang ditutup sekolahnya lebih banyak menghabiskan waktu secara online. Perubahan sikap ini berdampak pada bidang kriminalitas ataupun kejahatan dunia maya, khususnya dalam bentuk eksploitasi seksual baru yang berkembang saat ini dengan memanfaatkan sarana internet. Bentuk eksploitasi seksual baru tersebut disebut sebagai online child sexual exploitation yang terindikasi semakin merebak di tengah Pandemi COVID-19. Selain itu, Salah satu permasalahan yang muncul adalah tidak konsistennya penggunaan istilah atau terminologi terkait eksploitasi seksual anak secara online, sehingga berdampak pada kesulitan dalam penegakan hukum (law enforcement). Oleh karena itu, artikel ilmiah ini bermaksud untuk menguraikan dan menjelaskan mengenai terminologi dan karakteristik online child sexual exploitation dalam perspektif hukum positif, serta identifikasi dinamika kejahatan dunia maya mengenai online child sexual exploitation di tengah Pandemi COVID-19.
Ratio Legis Integrated Law Enforcement Centre (Gakkumdu) in the Electoral Law Enforcement System Rahman, Kholilur; Jamil; Arifin, Samsul; Zairuddin, Ahmad
Journal of Development Research Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Volume 9, Number 2, November 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28926/jdr.v9i2.427

Abstract

Compared to other legal regime issues, the issue of election law can be said to be more complex. In addition to the numerous categories of problems, the implementation of handling election law issues also involves many institutions, such as Gakkumdu, which consists of Bawaslu (Election Supervisory Board), the Public Prosecutor's Office, and the Police. This research is interesting to discuss because it deals with matters of authority related to institutional prestige, which may give rise to institutional controversies that deserve attention. Some of the discussions that will be addressed are the issue of ratio legislation or the foundation for the establishment of Gakkumdu and its position in enforcing criminal election laws. Furthermore, the urgency of Gakkumdu's authority in the process of enforcing criminal election laws and their problems will be discussed. The research method used is normative, employing a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The research findings conclude that, first, the ratio legis aims to achieve the principle of coordination to align the understanding and handling patterns of election-related crimes among Bawaslu, the Police, and the Public Prosecutor's Office. Second, Gakkumdu plays a crucial role in enforcing criminal election laws, which requires a prompt enforcement process. However, there are often problems in its enforcement, one of which is the lack of shared perception and agreement among Bawaslu, the Police, and the Public Prosecutor's Office in handling election-related criminal cases.
KEDUDUKAN AKTA YANG DIKELUARKAN OLEH NOTARIS YANG SEDANG DALAM MASA TAHANAN Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Kholilur Rahman; Abraham Sridjaja; Jamalum Sinambela
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v12i1.2573

Abstract

The notary in carrying out his position must remember that the deed made by or before him is an authentic deed that becomes a document/state archive, and the agreement stated therein becomes a law for those who make it. The important role of a Notary in making a deed is inseparable from the possibility of actions that are contrary to the propriety prevailing in the society in carrying out the duties and functions of a Notary. A notary who is currently in detention as long as he has not been dismissed as a notary is still capable of making an authentic deed, but in terms of propriety, this is not justified. UUJN contains sanctions against Notaries who are proven to have committed violations, during this period the Deeds made downgraded from Authentic Deeds to Underhanded Deeds. This legal research uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. In this context, it is concluded that the Notary is temporarily dismissed from his position because he is currently undergoing a detention period. After the temporary dismissal period ends due to the detention period, the Notary will be rehabilitated after the temporary dismissal period ends. The rehabilitation in question implies that the notary concerned is activated and returned to his original position. Therefore, if the notary is returned to his original position, the deed made by the notary is authentic. In this case, if the detention period is more than 6 months, while the temporary dismissal period has ended, the notary has authority according to his functions and duties.
The Urgency of the Confidentiality Principle in Restorative Justice Mechanisms Kholilur Rahman; Arum Ayu Lestari; Markus Suryoutomo
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n1.p221-249

Abstract

One of the legal issues that is interesting and rarely receives attention in the application of restorative justice is the confidentiality principle. In international provisions, it is regulated in Paragraph 14 of the United Nations Basic Principles and in Paragraph 2 of the Council of Europe Recommendation. In several countries, such as the United States, Belgium, and others, it has attracted the attention of legal scholars. In contrast, research in Indonesia has yet to adequately address or explore this principle in detail. Accordingly, it is both relevant and necessary to investigate the significance of this principle within restorative justice mechanisms. The discussion begins with an exploration of the underlying legal rationale (ratio legis) behind the principle of Confidentiality in models of restorative justice, followed by an analysis of the urgency of reformulating restorative justice provisions within the Indonesian criminal justice system in a way that guarantees this principle. This study employed a normative legal research method, supported by several approaches, including the statute approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of both primary and secondary legal sources. The main contribution of this research lies in its role as part of the law that ought to be (ius constituendum) for the reform of criminal procedure law in Indonesia.
Pendekatan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kartel Dalam Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Kholilur Rahman; Pratiwi Ayu Sri D; Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Jamalum Sinambela
Notary Law Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Desember: Notary Law Research
Publisher : Program Studi Kenotariatan Program Magister Fakultas Hukum UNTAG Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/nlr.v5i1.1085

Abstract

Para pelaku usaha berlomba-lomba dalam hal mengejar keuntungan sehingga terciptalah suatu iklim persaingan usaha antara perlaku usaha yang satu dengan pelaku usaha yang lain. Hal seperti ini menjadi positif apabila dalam suatu persaingan tersebut menggunakan cara-cara yang adil dan fair. Hal yang terjadi adalah tidak jarang pelaku usaha didasari oleh keinginan untuk menambah keuntungannya menggunakan cara-cara yang melanggar hukum dengan membuat suatu kesepakatan dengan pelaku usaha lain yang bertujuan untuk merusak iklim persaingan usaha yang telah berjalan baik yang salah satunya dikenal dengan istilah kartel. Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, iklim persaingan usaha dijaga oleh Negara. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha sebagai garda terdepan dalam hal pengawasan persaingan usaha. Namun terjadi beberapa permasalahan mengenai kewenangannya yang menyebabkan tetap terjadinya kartel dalam suatu persaingan usaha. Penelitian ini berusaha menjawab itu semua melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual maupun pendekatan kasus agar menghasilkan pemahaman atas permasalahan kartel dan penegakan hukum pidananya di Indonesia.
Can the AI Lawyer Be Applied in the Judicial System? Legal Perspectives in Indonesia and Malaysia Kholilur Rahman; Nadhira Wahyu Adityarani; Muhammad Dzulfikar Syaiful Ali; Zuhairah Ariff Binti Abd Ghadas
Media Iuris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v9i2.80740

Abstract

In the 21st century, technological developments have brought about significant changes to all aspects of human life in all sectors without exception. In recent years, challenges in the legal profession have become increasingly complex following the emergence of a recent innovation that has attracted the attention of many people around the world, namely the use of artificial intelligence-based software that can help users solve legal problems. For this qualification, its validity also needs to be reviewed based on the applicable Advocate Law and Advocate Code of Ethics, as well as the urgency of strict regulation and supervision to ensure that the position of AI lawyers does not have a negative impact on law enforcement as a whole. The formulation of the research problem begins with a discussion of the position of AI lawyers as legal subjects. The research method used is normative using a legal approach, as well as a conceptual approach and comparative approach. This article analyses the existing rules and procedures used in courts that may allow or restrict the application of AI in the judicial system.