Kholilur Rahman
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Problem Pengaturan Upaya Paksa Penangkapan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Kholilur Rahman
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss3.art3

Abstract

One of the highlights in Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, is that there are 2 institutions authorized to carry out investigations, namely the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) and the Indonesian National Police. BNN investigators in the authority to attempted forced arrest using the legal basis of Article 76 of Law no. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, while the Police investigators use Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Police investigators are only authorized to make arrests with a period of 1 x 24 hours, not 6 (six) days as the authority of BNN investigators. This difference in arrangement certainly creates legal uncertainty. This research will discuss, first, the implications of the difference in the regulation of the authority for forced arrest by BNN investigators and the National Police for narcotics offenders. Second, the harmonization of arrangements for the forced arrest of narcotics offenders by BNN investigators and the National Police. The research method used is normative, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study conclude that first, the difference in the regulation of the authority for forced arrest between BNN investigators and the National Police has resulted in different interpretations in its implementation, resulting in legal uncertainty and violations of the principle of equality before the law against narcotics offenders. Second, the disharmony of regulating the forced arrest of narcotics offenders by BNN and Police investigators needs to be harmonized based on the Criminal Procedure Code outlined in the integrated criminal justice system.
Modernisasi Persidangan Perkara Pidana Pasca Diterbitkannya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Administrasi Dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Kholilur Rahman
Lex Renaissance Vol 6 No 4 (2021): OKTOBER 2021
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss4.art5

Abstract

In the midst of a public health emergency, namely the Covid-19 Pandemic, it is not possible for the judiciary to conduct trials according to previously regulated standards. This is a big challenge for the Supreme Court to make all efforts to modernize the judiciary (judicial modernization) by deconstructing the judiciary and improving the quality of the judiciary for justice seekers. The formulation of the problem of this research, first, what is the ratio legis and the characteristics of electronic-based criminal trials (teleconference)? Second, the problem of implementing electronic criminal trials after the issuance of Perma Number 4 of 2020 concerning the Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Courts Electronically. The research method used is normative, using a statutory approach (Statute Approach) and a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach). The results of the study conclude, first, philosophically, namely preventing the spread of Covid-19 in the judiciary, based on the principle of "Salus populi suprema lex esto". In addition, it is based on the principle stated in Article 2 paragraph (4) of Law Number 48 of 2009 that "trials are carried out simply, quickly, and at low cost". Second, there are many problems in its implementation, namely in terms of network connections which have an impact on trial delays, witness issues, and evidentiary problems, especially evidence that in fact cannot be accessed online Keywords: Deconstruction; electronic-based criminal court; teleconferenceAbstrakDi tengah kedaruratan kesehatan masyarakat yaitu masa Pandemi Covid-19, tidak memungkinkan bagi lembaga peradilan untuk melakukan persidangan sesuai standart yang diatur sebelumnya. Hal ini, menjadi tantangan besar bagi Mahkamah Agung untuk melakukan segala upaya modernisasi peradilan (judicial modernization) dengan mendekonstruksi peradilan serta meningkatkan kualitas lembaga peradilan bagi para pencari keadilan. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini, pertama, apakah Ratio legis dan karakteristik persidangan pidana berbasis elektronik (teleconference)? Kedua, problem pemberlakuan persidangan pidana elektronik pasca diterbitkannya Perma Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 tentang Administrasi dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan secara Elektronik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan bersifat normatif, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (Statute Approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual Approach). Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, secara filosofis yaitu mencegah penyebaran Covid-19 di lingkungan peradilan, berdasarkan asas “Salus populi suprema lex esto”. Selain itu, didasarkan pada asas yang dinyatakan dalam Pasal 2 ayat (4) UU Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 bahwa “peradilan dilakukan dengan sederhana, cepat, dan biaya ringan”. Kedua, terdapat banyak problem dalam pelaksanaannya yaitu segi koneksi jaringan yang berdampak penundaan sidang, persoalan saksi, serta persoalan pembuktian khususnya barang bukti yang notabenenya tidak dapat diakses secara online.Kata Kunci:  Dekonstruksi; peradilan pidana berbasis elektronik; teleconference
ANTINOMI KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) DENGAN PENYIDIK POLRI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA TERPADU Kholilur Rahman; Efendik Kurniawan
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 20, No 1 (2022): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (460.113 KB) | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v20i1.3160

Abstract

In the context of law enforcement, the process of investigating criminal acts is one of the sub-systems in the criminal justice system in Indonesia, which has a significant and strategic position, because investigations are the main gate and the beginning of the criminal justice process. Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) are also given the authority to carry out professional investigations, in addition to the investigative authority of Polri Investigators. The investigation authority becomes a problem after there are various antinomical or contradictory provisions. In that context, it is interesting to analyze by first discussing the position of PPNS based on the criminal justice system and then discussing the harmonization of the provisionsof PPNS authority with Polri investigators in an integrated criminal justice system. The research method used in this study is normative, using a statute approach and a conceptual approach.
ANTINOMI KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) DENGAN PENYIDIK POLRI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA TERPADU Kholilur Rahman; Efendik Kurniawan
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 20, No 1 (2022): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (460.113 KB) | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v20i1.3160

Abstract

In the context of law enforcement, the process of investigating criminal acts is one of the sub-systems in the criminal justice system in Indonesia, which has a significant and strategic position, because investigations are the main gate and the beginning of the criminal justice process. Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) are also given the authority to carry out professional investigations, in addition to the investigative authority of Polri Investigators. The investigation authority becomes a problem after there are various antinomical or contradictory provisions. In that context, it is interesting to analyze by first discussing the position of PPNS based on the criminal justice system and then discussing the harmonization of the provisionsof PPNS authority with Polri investigators in an integrated criminal justice system. The research method used in this study is normative, using a statute approach and a conceptual approach.
Karakteristik Tindak Pidana Pemilu (Pemilihan Umum) dan Opsi Pembagianya Kholilur Rahman; M Djalil; Jamil Jamil
JURNAL BELO Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Volume 8 Nomor 2, Agustus 2022
Publisher : Criminal of Law Department, Faculty of Law, Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/belovol8issue2page136-148

Abstract

Election Crimes are criminal acts with administrative character (administrative penal law) because they threaten criminal sanctions for administrative of administrative crime is guided by the ultimum remedium principle, namely using criminal sanctions as the last alternative after prioritizing administrative sanctions. However, because criminal offenses ini elections have different destructive powers against elections, there should be a clear classification between each election crime. This means that even though they are included in the administrative penal law category, not all of them adhere to the ultimum remedium principle. This papare will discuss the characteristics of election crimes and aims to propose a clustering of election crimes based on certain measures, so that in their enforcement it is not gereralized between different criminal offenses. This paper uses a normative research method with conceptual opproach and statuta approach.
KEDUDUKAN AKTA YANG DIKELUARKAN OLEH NOTARIS YANG SEDANG DALAM MASA TAHANAN Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Kholilur Rahman; Abraham Sridjaja; Jamalum Sinambela
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Mei 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v12i1.2573

Abstract

The notary in carrying out his position must remember that the deed made by or before him is an authentic deed that becomes a document/state archive, and the agreement stated therein becomes a law for those who make it. The important role of a Notary in making a deed is inseparable from the possibility of actions that are contrary to the propriety prevailing in the society in carrying out the duties and functions of a Notary. A notary who is currently in detention as long as he has not been dismissed as a notary is still capable of making an authentic deed, but in terms of propriety, this is not justified. UUJN contains sanctions against Notaries who are proven to have committed violations, during this period the Deeds made downgraded from Authentic Deeds to Underhanded Deeds. This legal research uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. In this context, it is concluded that the Notary is temporarily dismissed from his position because he is currently undergoing a detention period. After the temporary dismissal period ends due to the detention period, the Notary will be rehabilitated after the temporary dismissal period ends. The rehabilitation in question implies that the notary concerned is activated and returned to his original position. Therefore, if the notary is returned to his original position, the deed made by the notary is authentic. In this case, if the detention period is more than 6 months, while the temporary dismissal period has ended, the notary has authority according to his functions and duties.
The Urgency of Public Information Disclosure in the Criminal Justice System Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Kholilur Rahman
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25273/ay.v2i2.14942

Abstract

Informasi yang memang sudah menjadi milik publik sudah seharusnya tidak dihalang-halangi oleh siapapun (termasuk negara) apabila publik membutuhkannya. Namun terdapat beberapa informasi yang memang tidak menjadi konsumsi publik (dikecualikan). Pembentukan sistem peradilan pidana terpadu yang ditunjang dengan teknologi informasi mutlak diperlukan dalam penanganan suatu perkara demi terciptanya efektivitas dan efisiensi penanganan perkara
Pendekatan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kartel Dalam Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Kholilur Rahman; Pratiwi Ayu Sri D; Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Jamalum Sinambela
Notary Law Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Desember: Notary Law Research
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum UNTAG Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/nlr.v5i1.1085

Abstract

Para pelaku usaha berlomba-lomba dalam hal mengejar keuntungan sehingga terciptalah suatu iklim persaingan usaha antara perlaku usaha yang satu dengan pelaku usaha yang lain. Hal seperti ini menjadi positif apabila dalam suatu persaingan tersebut menggunakan cara-cara yang adil dan fair. Hal yang terjadi adalah tidak jarang pelaku usaha didasari oleh keinginan untuk menambah keuntungannya menggunakan cara-cara yang melanggar hukum dengan membuat suatu kesepakatan dengan pelaku usaha lain yang bertujuan untuk merusak iklim persaingan usaha yang telah berjalan baik yang salah satunya dikenal dengan istilah kartel. Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, iklim persaingan usaha dijaga oleh Negara. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha sebagai garda terdepan dalam hal pengawasan persaingan usaha. Namun terjadi beberapa permasalahan mengenai kewenangannya yang menyebabkan tetap terjadinya kartel dalam suatu persaingan usaha. Penelitian ini berusaha menjawab itu semua melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual maupun pendekatan kasus agar menghasilkan pemahaman atas permasalahan kartel dan penegakan hukum pidananya di Indonesia.
Kriminologi Bukan Bagian Dalam Ilmu Hukum Pidana Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma Putra; Rahman, Kholilur
Academos Vol 1 No 1 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i1.13956

Abstract

Ilmu hukum dogmatik selalu berbicara mengenai hukum dan selalu berpikiran untuk mencari dan menemukan penyelesaian-penyelesaian konkret atas problematik hukum. Oleh karena itu maka tugas ilmu hukum dogmatik adalah memberi/mengadakan preskriptif, analisis, mensistematisasikan, menafsirkan, dan menilai hukum yang berlaku (terapan). Ilmu hukum (jurisprudence) merupakan suatu ilmu yang bersifat sui generis, maka fokus perhatian seharusnya berada pada hukum itu sendiri. Akan tetapi berbeda halnya menurut penganut mahzab ilmu empiris dalam hukum, mereka menganggap bahwa mempelajari ilmu hukum harus juga mempelajari cabang-cabang ilmu lain yang berkaitan dengan ilmu hukum. Kriminologi merupakan keseluruhan pengetahuan yang membahas mengenai kejahatan sebagai suatu gejala sosial. Termasuk didalamnya pembahasan proses pembuat undang-undangnya, pelanggaran terhadap undang-undang serta reaksi terhadap pelanggaran undang-undang. Sebenarnya kejahatan menurut hukum pidana dan kejahatan menurut kriminologi sebagian besar terjadi overlapping, mereka merupakan 2 (dua) lingkaran yang titik singgungnya tidak terletak satu sama lain dalam satu titik yang sama, akan tetapi juga tidak berjauhan. Kajian hukum pidana memiliki dimensi unsur kesalahan dan unsur melawan hukum, sedangkan kriminologi memiliki dimensi motif pelaku dan faktor sosial yang memberikan kesempatan pada pelaku untuk melakukan kejahatan. KataKunci :Kriminologi,IlmuHukum,HukumPidana.
Relevance of Life Prison in View from the Purpose of Criminal Rahman, Kholilur; Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma Putra; Sinambela, Jamalum; Budi, Kukuh Pramono; Lestari, Arum Ayu
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v6i2.17239

Abstract

Forms of imprisonment are divided into 2 (two), namely imprisonment for a certain time and imprisonment for life. Life imprisonment is a prison sentence that is served by the convict by remaining in prison until his death. This research is a legal research that uses a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach is used to find out the effectiveness and efficiency of life imprisonment as a form of punishment. This research also describes the ineffectiveness of life imprisonment and seeks to describe forms of punishment that are more appropriate to be carried out in this modern era for the sake of upholding justice and achieving the goals of punishment.