Salmawati Salmawati
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Distribution of Inheritance According to Mawaris Islamic Jurisprudence Law in the Compilation of Islamic Law Muhammad Adam Surya Raya; Salmawati Salmawati; Mursyid Mursyid
COMPENDIUM OF JUDGE MADE LAW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Compendium of Judge Made Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/COJML.v1i2.1319

Abstract

Abstract: The application of the reverse burden of proof in gratification cases within corruption offenses is a pivotal legal instrument in Indonesia’s anti-corruption strategy, yet its effectiveness remains subject to both theoretical debate and practical challenges. While this mechanism normatively grants defendants the opportunity to prove that the gratification received is unrelated to their official position, there is a notable research gap in examining how judicial reasoning determines the success or failure of such proof in court proceedings. This study employs a normative juridical method with a case study approach, focusing on court decisions that implement the reverse burden of proof. The analysis centers on the construction of judicial arguments in assessing the evidence and statements presented by the defendant. The findings reveal that the defendant failed to convince the panel of judges that the gratification in question was beyond the scope of their authority, highlighting the substantial evidentiary burden borne by defendants. These results underscore the necessity for a comprehensive understanding of both substantive and procedural legal aspects in reverse proof mechanisms, while contributing to the broader discourse on the development of criminal procedural law in corruption cases in Indonesia.  
RECOGNITION OF INDIGENOUS LAND RIGHTS WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE (ESG) FRAMEWORK: A LEGAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA AND THAILAND Muhdar, Muh. Zulkifli; A. Muin, Sri Amlinawaty; Salmawati, Salmawati; Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip Tungkasamitra
Cepalo Vol 10 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v10no1.4841

Abstract

This study offers a comparative analysis of the recognition and protection of indigenous land and natural resource rights within the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework in Indonesia and Thailand. Using a normative legal method with statutory and comparative approaches, it examines how national legal and institutional systems integrate indigenous rights and how ESG functions as a mechanism for mitigating agrarian and environmental conflicts. The findings show that Indonesia has a stronger legal basis for recognizing indigenous rights through the 1945 Constitution and Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012, but faces inconsistent implementation of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle, while Thailand demonstrates more advanced ESG reporting and transparency yet lacks explicit legal protection for indigenous communities. This study positions ESG as a system of social risk governance and underscores the need for stronger synergy among national law, financial institutions, and indigenous participation to achieve inclusive and equitable ESG implementation in Southeast Asia.