Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics

Analysis of the Drop Sensors Accuracy in Central Peristaltic Infusion Monitoring Displayed on PC Based Wireless (TCRT5000 Drop Sensor) Hanna Firdaus; Bambang Guruh Irianto; Sumber; Jing Lu
Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol 4 No 1 (2022): January
Publisher : Department of Electromedical Engineering, POLTEKKES KEMENKES SURABAYA and IKATEMI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/jeeemi.v4i1.5

Abstract

In some hospitals the infusion is still done manually, medical staff observes fluid drip directly and then controls its rate using a mechanical resistor (clamp), this method is certainly far from the level of accuracy. Infusion pump is a medical aid that has functions to control and ensure the correct dose of infusion fluid that is given to patients under treatment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the accuracy of the TCRT5000 as a drop sensor, based on readings of the infusion pump monitoring system. This module consists of a TCRT5000 drop sensor module, comparator circuit, monostable circuit, stepper motor, L298N motor driver, and ATmega328 microcontroller. The droplets are detected by the TCRT 5000 sensor, then amplified by a comparator and monostable circuit, then the flow rate and remaining volume readings are generated by the ATmega328 microcontroller. Furthermore, this data is sent to the Personal Computer (PC) via wireless HC-11. The results of the flow rate module measurement show that the highest error value is 4% at the 30 ml/hour setting, and the lowest error value is 1% at the 60 ml/hour setting. While the results of the flow rate measurement using an Infuse Device Analyzer, the highest error value is 2,2% at the 30 ml/hour setting, and the lowest error value is 0,58% at the 100 ml/hour setting. This infusion pump monitoring is designed centrally to facilitate the nurse's task in monitoring the infusion dose accurately that is given to the patient.
Eight Channel Temperature Monitoring using Thermocouple Sensors (type K) Based on Internet of Thing using ThinkSpeak Platform Candra Prastyadi; Bedjo utomo; Her Gumiwang Ariswati; Dyah Titisari; Sumber Sumber; A. Senthil Kumar
Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol 5 No 1 (2023): January
Publisher : Department of Electromedical Engineering, POLTEKKES KEMENKES SURABAYA and IKATEMI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/jeeemi.v5i1.276

Abstract

A laboratory incubator is a device used to incubate a breed. a very important condition in the procedure Incubator is the optimal temperature conditions for microorganisms to grow. The incubator is equipped with a temperature controller so that the temperature can be adjusted according to the breed to be raised. Incubators use an oven like dry heat. The purpose of this study was to test and analyze the accuracy of the thermocouple sensor with incubator media in a laboratory incubator calibrator. The main design method uses the 8 MAX 6675 module, the 8 K type Thermocouple module, Arduino Mega, and SD Card data storage. Temperature measurements were measured with a Type K thermocouple sensor. The thermocouple sensor has 8 channels which function to measure the temperature at each camber point of the incubator. The temperature will be stored on the SD card for data analysis and the data can be processed in graphical form. Benchmarking is done using a temperature data logger. This is done so that the design results are below the standard comparison tool. The measurement results on the module compared to the comparison tool obtained the largest error value, namely 3.98%, namely on channel T6 at 35°C with ordinary incubator media and the smallest error on ordinary incubator media at point T6 at 37°C, which is 0.06 % and at 35 C the temperature of the incubator fan has the largest error of 2.98% and the smallest error of 0.86%. the module can perform well by testing the comparison tool at every point