Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arena Hukum RechtIdee
Setyo Widagdo
Universitas Brawijaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Role of Marine Security Agency (BAKAMLA) As Sea and Coast Guards in Indonesian Water Jurisdiction Rika Kurniaty; Herman Suryokumoro; Setyo Widagdo
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.2017

Abstract

The Indonesian geographical condition as an archipelagic state with abundant natural resources has put maritime security into its central issue. Several challenges are facing Indonesia’s maritime coordination. National maritime agencies are still overlapping and duplicating based on various laws and regulations. As part of the Indonesian vision to be a ‘global maritime fulcrum,’ Indonesia’s government established the Marine Security Agency (BAKAMLA). BAKAMLA aims to shift the law enforcement paradigm from a multi-agency multi-task to a single-agency multi-task. The establishment of BAKAMLA is expected to create law enforcement’s effectiveness and efficiency in Indonesia’s water jurisdiction. This study is a type of normative juridical research using a statute approach and case study approach. This study reveals that the emerging of BAKAMLA, based on Law Number 32 of 2014 concerning Marine, grants broad authority to the maritime security agency. BAKAMLA has the power to direct instant pursue, dismiss, inspect, arrest, carry, and deliver the ship to the related authorized agency for further legal proceedings. BAKAMLA also has the authority to integrated security and safety information systems. The presence of BAKAMLA does not necessarily disregard or eliminate other institutions in the same task, but as a guard to stimulate to synergize further the security and safety of Indonesia’s territorial waters under a single command unit.
PENGESAHAN PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA Setyo Widagdo
Arena Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01201.10

Abstract

Abstract The ratification of an international treaty is an important action of a nation because it will determine the involvement of that nation in the international agreement. Law No.24 Year 2000 concerning International Treaties regulates about ratification, both in terms of internal (article 9) and external (article 1 number 2). The purpose of this article is to analyze whether ratification of an international agreement according to Law No.24 Year 2000 is “approval” or “confirmation”? And what is the appropriate action or form of such ratification? The results shows that the ratification of an international agreement, if view from an external procedure must be interpreted as a form of “confirmation”. Whereas from the internal procedure point of view, ratification must be interpreted as an “approval of the DPR”. This can also be interpreted as a "confirmation" from the legislature to the President, so that the President conducts a ratification in an external sense.  AbstrakPengesahan terhadap perjanjian internasional merupakan suatu tindakan penting dari suatu negara, karena akan menentukan keterikatan negara tersebut dalam perjanjian internasional. Dalam UU No 24 Tahun 2000 tentang Perjanjian Internasional, telah diatur tentang pengesahan ini, baik pengesahan dalam arti internal (Pasal 9)  maupun pengesahan dalam arti eksternal (Pasal 1 angka 2). Tujuan penulisan artikel ini menganalisis  tentang apakah pengesahan perjanjian internasional menurut UU No 24 tahun 2000 tersebut merupakan “persetujuan” ataukah merupakan “konfirmasi” ? dan apa bentuk hukum yang tepat dari tindakan pengesahan tersebut ?. Adapun hasil dari pembahasan adalah bahwa pengesahan terhadap perjanjian internasional, jika dilihat dari prosedur eksternal, maka harus dimaknai sebagai “konfirmasi”, yakni perbuatan hukum untuk mengikatkan diri pada perjanjian internasional.  Sementara itu, pengesahan sebagai prosedur internal harus dimaknai sebagai “persetujuan DPR” , yang juga dapat dimaknai sebagai “konfirmasi” dari legislatif kepada Presiden, agar Presiden melakukan pengesahan dalam arti eksternal.
KRITERIA PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL YANG HARUS MENDAPATKAN PERSETUJUAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT Setyo Widagdo; Ikaningtyas Ikaningtyas
RechtIdee Vol 17, No 1 (2022): June
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v17i1.11051

Abstract

This article discusses the criteria for international agreements that must get   approval from Indonesian Legislative Assembly with focus on two problem what is the legal implications of Constitutional Court decision number 33/PUU-XVI/2018  for the criteria of international agreements that must be approved by Indonesian Legislative Assembly and how to determine the criteria of the international treaties that have broad and fundamental effects on people's lives which is related to the country’s financial burden. This is a normative legal research. The results of this study is that the legal implications of the Constitutional Court's decision for the criteria of international agreements which must have approval of Indonesian Legislative Assembly should be positive. Asides from not giving any limit of the criteria, it can also be used as a control for the government carelessness in ratifying international agreements in trading which is almost always using Presidential Regulation instrument. To determine the criteria that an international agreement has broad consequences and fundamentals related to the country’s financial burden or require establishment of regulation, is carried out through a consultation mechanism, and the results of this consultation are recommendations and respected.
Co-Authors Fransiska A. Susanto Herman Suryokumoro Ikaningtyas Ikaningtyas Ikaningtyas Ikaningtyas M. Choirul Hidayat Rika Kurniaty