Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman AL-HUKAMA´ Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Jurnal Pembelajaran Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JP2M) Ma'mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law
A. Kemal Riza
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Menakar Ideologi Republik Islam Iran: Kontestasi Antara Ideologi dan Pragmatisme dalam Politik Riza, A. Kemal
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): Oktober 2017
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (547.076 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2017.7.2.279-301

Abstract

Abstract: Iran declared as an Islamic state since its 1979 Islamic revolution. Since leadership of Ayatullah Khomeini, Islamic ideology has been carried out in all levels of the state. In politics, it was conducted by creating wilayah al-faqih, in which the ulama plays important and decisive role. Iran even tried to expand this ideology outside its border, especially in areas with considerable number of Shi’i population. However, in its practice, the implementation of this Islamic ideology should also accommodate pragmatism and other aspects that contradict that ideology, namely nationalism and cultural pluralism. In politics, this is reflected by the emergence of ideologists and reformists-pragmatists. This dichotomy can be witnessed in presidential elections. While Ali Khamenei and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are considered ideologists, Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, Muhammad Khatami and Hassan Rouhani are reformists-pragmatists. Ideological expansion which was proven backfired was also put on halt. In social-cultural expression of the society, there is growing trend to identify Iran using pre-Islamic symbols. This is happen mostly among younger generation who do not take part in the 1979 revolution. Abstrak: Iran adalah sebuah negara yang mengumumkan sebagai Negara Islam modern sejak revolusi Islam di tahun 1979. Di bawah kepemimpinan Ayatullah Khomeini, ideologi Islam dilaksanakan dalam berbagai cara dan mekanisme, antara lain kepemimpinan ulama (wilâyah al-faqîh) yang tercermin dalam peran sentral ulama dalam politik kenegaraan dan implementasi besar-besaran nilai-nilai keislaman dalam politik dan kehidupan sosial. Iran bahkan berusaha melakukan ekspansi ideologi Islam mereka ke wilayah-wilayah Islam lainnya, khususnya yang memiliki paham Syi’ah yang sama. Akan tetapi, dalam praktiknya upaya ini tidak dapat dilaksanakan secara murni tanpa akomodasi terhadap pragmatisme politik. Dalam politik kenegaraan, hal ini tercermin dengan kemunculan kelompok ideologis dan pragmatis-reformis dalam politik, diantaranya dalam pemilihan presiden. Beberapa presiden Iran tergolong ideologis seperti Ali Khamenei dan Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, sedangkan Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, Muhammad Khatami dan presiden saat ini Hassan Rouhani termasuk reformis-pragmatis. Ekspansi ideologis yang tidak menghasilkan apa-apa kecuali resistensi juga nampak dibatasi. Dalam kehidupan sosial, semakin banyak kecenderungan masyarakat Iran untuk menonjolkan identitas Persia pra-Islam, khususnya di kalangan generasi muda yang tidak berpartisipasi dalam revolusi Iran di tahun 1979.
The Dynamic Problems of Polygamy Cases in Indonesia:: The Showcase of Juridical Authority, Implementation of Contra Legem and Fiqh Argumentations Naily, Nabiela; Riza, A. Kemal; Biroroh, Ta’mirotul
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022): April
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2022.12.1.51-75

Abstract

Abstract: One issue that remains a stumble block for modernization of Islamic family law is polygamy. In Indonesia, polygamy is restricted, but not completely forbidden. Husbands who have desires for polygamy should fulfill requirements before the court of justice. However, there is a tendency among judges of Islamic courts nowadays to grant permission for them to practice polygamy although not all of those husbands meet the requirements as outlined by the Marriage Law. The judges argue that according to Article 5 the Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Authority they have the right and are obliged to deliver justice at all costs. Therefore, they grant permission for polygamy not only on the basis of the corresponding the Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, but also on the authority of rechtsvinding, Islamic jurisprudence or fiqh as living law concept, and contra legem theory, a progressive implementation of legal value. Keywords: polygamy, juridical authority, contra legem
Assessing the Potential of Najm al-Din al-Tufi’s Maṣlaḥah for Islamic Legal Reform Riza, Achmad Kemal; Bilhaq, Ahmad Razan
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 6 No. 5 (2025): October
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (https://uinsa.ac.id/fsh/facility)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v6i5.488

Abstract

This paper discusses the thoughts of Najm al-Din al-Tufi (1277–1316 AD), a Hanbali scholar who was known to be radical in carrying out the concept of maṣlaḥah. This research is a normative and textual approach. Data collection is carried out through literature review, and it was analyzed descriptively.  This article finds that al-Tufi places maṣlaḥah as the main postulate in the determination of the law, even in certain cases it can surpass nas and ijma'. This thought departs from his commentary on the hadis lā ḍarar wa lā ḍirār, which, according to him, affirms the principle of the elimination of harm and the maintenance of benefits. He defines maṣlaḥah broadly, dividing it into two domains: worship and muqaddarāt, which are subject to nas, and mu'āmalāt, which is entirely subject to human welfare. Within this framework, al-Tufi developed the methods of tarjīḥ and bayān to resolve the contradiction in the postulate by prioritizing maṣlaḥah. His thoughts sparked controversy; some scholars accuse him of ignoring the authority of the text, while modern thinkers see it as a progressive bid to renew Islamic law. Although limited only to the realm of mu'āmalāt, the idea of al-Tufi is still relevant in responding to contemporary legal problems that are not explicitly accommodated in nas or ijma'.
Co-Authors Ahmad Imam Mawardi Al-Maliki, Muhammad Alwi Al-Maliki, Muhammad Alwi Annisa', Raudhatun Bilhaq, Ahmad Razan Biroroh, Ta’mirotul eka rahmawati Faby Toriqir Rama Farahdiba, Ani Nabila Haikal, Ahmad Hasanain Hidayah, Aisyah M. Maulana Asegaf Muhammad Alwi Al-Maliki Nabiela Naily Rama, Faby Toriqir Rama, Faby Toriqir Wibowo, Alya Ghina