Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.286
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam JURNAL KARSA (Terakreditasi No. 80/DIKTI/Kep/2012) ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman JURNAL TADRIS STAIN PAMEKASAN Jurnal Ushuluddin Islam Futura Religio : Jurnal Studi Agama-agama KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture) Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith El-Qist : Journal of Islamic Economics and Business (JIEB) Aloha International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advancement (AIJMU)
Idri Idri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
EPISTEMOLOGY OF ISTINBAȚ IN QURAISH SHIHAB’S INTERPRETATION OF MARRIAGE VERSES IN TAFSIR AL-MISBAH Ishaq, Zamroni; Idri, Idri; Musyafa'ah, Suqiyah; Khalqi, Ahmad Muhammad Sa'dul
Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 26, No 1 (2025): Tafsir and Hadith
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/ua.v26i1.29888

Abstract

Quraish Shihab is a prominent figure in contemporary Islamic scholarship, especially regarding Quranic exegesis. However, some critics challenge his legal formulations concerning marriage law. This study examines Shihab’s istinbâț epistemology—his methodology in deriving Islamic legal rulings— through his marriage-related verses interpretation in Tafsir al-Misbah using Yusuf al-Qaradâwî’s ijtihad theory, the analytical framework. It adopts a qualitative textual approach, focusing on Shihab’s interpretations’ sources, methods, and legal characteristics. The findings reveal Shihab’s diverse sources: Quranic exegesis, asbâb al-nuzûl, Hadith, early scholars’ opinions, and insights from social sciences and health disciplines. He combines ijtihâd intiqâ’î (selective reasoning) and ijtihâd jâmi’ (synthetic reasoning), engaging classical jurisprudence while constructing rulings suited to contemporary contexts. Rationality, contextuality, and flexibility, which mark a shift from rigid traditionalism to an adaptive, ethically driven Islamic legal thought, have characterized Shihab’s legal reasoning. His model affirms that Islamic law must remain faithful to its scriptural foundations while being responsive to modern human realities. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on legal reform and Islamic epistemology by demonstrating how contextual ijtihâd enriches modern jurisprudence. It highlights the need for dynamic interpretive models bridging tradition and contemporary social change offering valuable insights for scholars, jurists, and reform-oriented Muslim communities.
Co-Authors Aat Ruchiat Nugraha Abdul Hafidz Abdul Kadir Abdul Kadir Riyadi Andi Luhur Prianto Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi Azhar Ibrahim Azhar Ibrahim Fathurrofiq Fathurrofiq Fathurrofiq, Fathurrofiq Gönan, Yavuz Ibrahim, Zumiyati Sanu Ishaq, Zamroni Karimullah, Suud Sarim Khaidir, Piet Hizbullah Khalqi, Ahmad Muhammad Sa'dul Khoirul Ulum Mohammad Arif Muhammad Ridlwan Nasir Musyafa'ah, Suqiyah