Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)

Desensitization Treatment for Dentin Hypersensitive in Heavy-Smoker Patient Khofifah, Safitri Dwiwandari; Faizah, Ariyani
Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity) 2023: Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is the most common dental and oral complaint in the world's population, in the form of sharp and short pain as a response to exposure to stimuli on exposed dentin which can occur due to several factors, one of which is gingival recession. Smoking is a factor that causes gingival recession which can cause DH. This case report aims to demonstrate desensitization treatment in a heavy smoking patient with a case of dentin hypersensitivity. Case report: The patient is a 35 year old male with the chief complaint of bad breath and moderate pain in tooth 43, has a bad habit of heavy smoking, up to 20 cigarettes per day. The patient's intraoral examination results had moderate OHI, gingival recession, and positive results on the pain provocation test. The patient experienced gingivitis et causa plaque and calculus accompanied by tooth 43 dentin hypersensitivity. Treatment planning for patients is to provide dental health education (DHE) regarding maintaining oral hygiene and eliminating smoking habits followed by desensitization. Before desensitization, scaling root planing was performed. Desensitization in this case is carried out to treat dentin hypersensitivity with a dual action mechanism desensitization agent (neural action and occlusive action), namely KF 2% topically on the cervical surface of tooth 43 which experienced dentin hypersensitivity due to gingival recession. Results: Dentin hypersensitivity in the patient was successfully treated using a desensitizing agent after repeated topical application of KF 2% four times. Conclusion: Smoking habits can worsen oral health and damage periodontal tissue in the form of gingival recession causing dentin hypersensitivity. DH treatment is desensitization accompanied by DHE to eliminate the cause of dentin hypersensitivity.
The Differences of Saliva pH between Consumption of Sucrose Chocolate and Stevia Chocolate in 10-12 years Old Children Widianto, Shafwan Rafif; Kaswindiarti, Septriyani; Sari, Nendika Dyah Ayu Murika; Faizah, Ariyani
Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity) 2023: Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Introduction: Children enjoy eating sweet treats like chocolate, which often contains sugar as a sweetener. This can influence the pH of saliva and affect the processes of demineralization and remineralization in teeth. Up until now, there has not been any research on the variation in saliva pH when consuming regular chocolate (with sucrose) compared to chocolate sweetened with stevia in children aged 10-12 years. This study aims to explore the differences in saliva pH between children in this age group who consume sucrose chocolate and those who consume stevia chocolate. Methods: In this study, a Quasi-Experimental design was employed, and approval was granted by the Ethical Committee of Health Research at Dr. Moewardi General Hospital under Ethical Clearance Number 2.045/XI/HREC/2023. Initially, twenty-one children aged 10-12 years from SD Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta had their saliva measured before any intervention. They were then given chocolate containing 30% sucrose for 60 seconds. Ten minutes after this intervention, the children were asked to collect saliva in their mouths and spit out 2ml into a sterile container. The collected saliva was then tested for pH using a pH metre (Hanna brand, Romania). On the following day, the subjects were instructed to consume chocolate sweetened with 1% stevia using the same method. The average difference in saliva pH before and two days after the intervention was analysed using an independent T-Test on the saliva pH difference. Results: The research discovered that the average change in saliva pH before and after eating sucrose chocolate was 0.3413 ± 0.12557, while for stevia chocolate, it was 0.1444 ± 0.07698. Tests for normal distribution (Shapiro-wilk test) and data homogeneity (Levene’s homogeneity test) both indicated acceptable conditions (p>0.05). The independent T-Test revealed significant differences in saliva pH between children aged 10-12 years when consuming sucrose chocolate compared to stevia chocolate (p<0.05). Conclusion: In summary, the study on saliva pH differences in 10-12-year-old children after eating sucrose chocolate compared to stevia chocolate indicates that there is indeed a distinction in saliva pH between the two. Children who consumed sucrose chocolate showed a lower saliva pH compared to those who consumed stevia chocolate.