Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum JUSTISI
Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGUJIAN KEKEBALAN DIPLOMATIK DAN KONSULER AMERIKA SERIKAT BERDASARKAN HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO. 673K/PDT.SUS/2012) Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri; Suatra Putrawan
Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 03, No. 02, Mei 2015
Publisher : Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (47.726 KB)

Abstract

Agen diplomatik dan konsuler pada prinsipnya memiliki kekebalan berdasarkan Konvensi Wina 1961 dan 1963.Tetapi dalam penerapannya, kekebalan tersebut ternyata ditafsirkan dalam konteks berbeda ketika berhadapan dengan hukum nasional Indonesia.Dalam perkara di Mahkamah Agung RI No. 673K/Pdt.Sus/2012, kekebalan diplomatik dan konsuler yang dimiliki oleh Pimpinan Konsulat Amerika Serikat di Medan dan Kedutaan Besar Amerika Serikat di Jakarta berhadapan dengan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia.Pokok utama dalam tulisan ini adalah penerapan kekebalan diplomatik dan konsuler dalam kasus tersebut.Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dikombinasikan dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus.Kesimpulan dari tulisan ini bahwa dalam kasus tersebut kekebalan diplomatik dan konsuler yang dikenal dalam hukum internasional dikontekstualisasikan berdasarkan hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia.
Pembelaan Terpaksa Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Excess) Dalam Konsep Reposisi Korban Puspanegara, I Gusti Ngurah Dwi; Wulandari, Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri; Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i3.3287

Abstract

The victim who is in the position of being the perpetrator of defense exceed the limit due to the act of murder committed against the perpetrator of begal in criminal law regulated in Article 49 Paragraph (2), which is known as Noodweer Exces. This study aims to identify situations where defense exceed the limit in the context of the victim's role reversal in the case of the crime of robbery. The study applied normative legal research as the method. The approach involves analyzing and describing legal materials such as relevant literature, journals, and regulations, focusing on interrelated primary and secondary legal sources. The main difference with previous study is the emphasis on statutory analysis and case approach, as well as the application of the theory of criminal elimination, the theory of negative proof, and the principle of culpa in causa as supporting theoretical foundations. The findings show that, in principle, criminal regulations in Indonesia protect from a legal perspective against acts of defense carried out by individuals, in this case involved as victims of a criminal offense. Therefore, acts of defense exceed the limits are considered not criminalizable because defense is a right owned by everyone to fight against actions contrary to legal provisions. A person is considered in forced defense if they meet the conditions stipulated in Article 49 Paragraph (2) of the criminal law. These conditions include the act of defense that exceeds the established limits, the direct effect of severe mental or mental shock due to the attack that occurred at that time, and the act of defense in response to the attack or threat of attack. However, the granting abolition of punishment also depends on the results of the trial evidence in this case, which determines whether the perpetrator entitled to obtain it or not.
Status Quo Perkawinan Beda Agama Pasca Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani; I Kadek Budiadinata Satriatama Adnyana; Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i1.3360

Abstract

The trend of interfaith marriages is currently gaining interest in Indonesia. Data shows that by 2022, data on interfaith marriages will total 1425 spouses. The presence of the polemic about interfaith marriages in society has resulted in the government, through the Supreme Court, issuing SEMA 2/2023, which prohibits courts from accepting applications for interfaith marriages. Therefore, it is necessary to know the legality of interfaith marriages after SEMA 2/2023, especially regarding the legal ratio of the issuance of SEMA 2/20232. This study aims to determine the basis for the publication of SEMA 2/2023 and the validity of interfaith marriages after the publication of SEMA 2/2023. The study's novelty is demonstrated by the actuality of regulations published related to interfaith marriages in Indonesia, where previous studies analyzed the legality of interfaith marriages before the publication of SEMA 2/2023. The normative legal writing method is used by several approaches, such as the statutory regulations approach -invitation, case approach, and conceptual approach. The collection of legal materials in this study used literature study techniques. At the same time, the legal material analysis method is the descriptive analytical juridical method. The results show that the basis for preparing the circular letter is intended to guide judges in recording religious marriages in Indonesia. Also, since the circular letter came into force, the courts no longer have the authority to register interfaith marriages held in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani I Kadek Budiadinata Satriatama Adnyana Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Triwulandari Puspanegara, I Gusti Ngurah Dwi Suatra Putrawan