Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.525
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Wacana Hukum Pandecta Yustisia KEADILAN PROGRESIF Jurnal Pranata Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Unram Law Review Jurnal Yudisial PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Cepalo Mulawarman Law Review Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Belo Perspektif Hukum
Faisal Faisal
Universitas Bangka Belitung
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Cepalo

 1 
HAK SAKSI DAN KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA KASUS TERTENTU DALAM PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN PERSPEKTIF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW Ndaru Satrio; Faisal Faisal
Cepalo Vol 5 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v5no1.2109

Abstract

Pemberian hak kepada saksi dan korban tindak pidana pada kasus tertentu dalam perlindungan saksi dan korban yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 5 ayat (2) UU No. 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban dapat menimbulkan problematika tersendiri dalam pelaksanaan perlindungan saksi dan korban. Ada beberapa problematika yang  ditemukan oleh penulis jika pasal yang tersebut tetap dibelakukan. Problematika yang pertama yaitu pemberian hak kepada saksi dan korban tindak pidana pada kasus tertentu menimbulkan saksi dan korban pada tindak pidana yang lain tidak dapat mengajukan permohonan untuk mendapatkan hak yang tertera pada Pasal 5 ayat (1) UU No. 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Problematika kedua, adanya penerapan pemberian hak kepada saksi dan korban tindak pidana pada kasus tertentu menutup kesempatan perkara di luar perkara pidana seperti perkara perdata, perkara TUN untuk mendapatkan hak yang serupa . Problematika yang ketiga adalah konflik norma antara Pasal 5 ayat (2) UU No. 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban dengan Pasal 224 ayat (1) KUHP. Dalam konteks ini penulis menggunakan asas yang relevan sebagai pisau analisis, yaitu asas equality before the law.Penulis berpandangan dengan adanya pemberian hak kepada saksi dan korban tindak pidana pada kasus tertentu dalam perlindungan saksi dan korban justru tidak sesuai dengan asas equality before the law, sehingga penulis mempunyai gagasan sebagai berikut: (1) Redaksi pemberian hak kepada saksi dan korban tindak pidana pada kasus tertentu dalam perlindungan saksi dan korban dalam Pasal 5 ayat (2) UU No. 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban harus segera diubah, (2) Perlindungan saksi dan korban harusnya tidak hanya untuk perkara pidana saja, tetapi juga harus mencakup semua perkara di luar perkara pidana, (3) Pemenuhan kewajiban dan pemberian hak harus senantiasa dijaga keseimbangannya (4) Pembaharuan perlindungan saksi dan korban harus dituangkan dalam suatu peraturan perundang-undangan.
PERSPECTIVE OF RELIGIOUS JUSTICE IN THE FORMULATION OF PENAL REFORM Reski Anwar; Faisal Faisal; Rio Amanda Agustin
Cepalo Vol 5 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v5no1.2240

Abstract

The perspective of justice from law enforcement is only on the law’s guidance, not based on God’s guidance that prioritizes substantive justice. The idea of religious justice contained in the renewal of criminal law there is Article 53 paragraph (2), with the provision reads in considering the establishment of law and justice as referred to in paragraph (1) there is a conflict that can not be met, the judge must prioritize justice. The recommendations are stated because the explanation of Article 53 paragraph (2) says that justice and legal certainty are two legal objectives that are often not in line with each other and difficult to avoid in legal practice. A rule of law that meets more legal certainty demands, the more likely aspects of justice are urged. Metode research used in this study is normative research, namely research on library materials that are essential data that is classified as secondary data that rests on data collection tools similar to literature studies or document studies. The results showed that if in the application of concrete events, justice and legal certainty are mutually urgent, then the judge, as far as possible, prioritizes justice over legal certainty. Religious Justice that exists in the value of Pancasila formulated into the renewal of criminal law justice contains a demand that people treat others following their rights and obligations. The treatment is not indiscriminate or compassionate; instead, everyone is treated equally under their rights and responsibilities.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL INJUSTICE: IMPACT AND SUSTAINABILITY OF SMALL SCALE TIN MINING UNDER INDONESIA’S NEW MINERAL AND COAL REGULATION Derita Prapti Rahayu; Faisal Faisal; Darwance Darwance; Komang Jaka Ferdian
Cepalo Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Issue In progress (August 2023)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v7no2.3137

Abstract

The transformation of mining law policy in Law No. 3 of 2020 concerning Minerals and Coal has broad implications for mining law, including illegal tin mining. The high dependence of the tin extractive economy in Bangka Belitung has changed the landscape of this archipelago province as an area with a high level of natural damage and social disasters. The ability of governments through regulatory instruments to tackle illegal mining is an important ideal goal. This research was conducted using socio-legal methods, to produce a comprehensive analysis related to the environmental and social impacts of illegal tin mining after the renewal of the mineral and coal law. This study found that the transition of mining authority from the central government to the regional government directly has an impact on the proliferation of illegal mining activities. Substantive changes in the mineral and coal law have not provided a strategic solution because the tug-of-war over authority ends with the continued delegation of authority to grant community mining permits to local governments. Meanwhile, the unpreparedness of local governments has resulted in the continued marginalization of mining communities and has an impact on widespread environmental damage. The lack of fair decision-making processes for people mining licences is indicative of an immature tin mining management in Bangka Belitung. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the implications of the latest mineral and coal policies on illegal tin mining activities, as a reference and consideration in strategic policy making to create an ideal and sustainable tin mining ecosystem.
Co-Authors Ahda Muttaqin Ahda Muttaqin Amir Dedoe Anri Darmawan Anri Darmawan Darwance, Darwance Derita Prapti Rahayu Elmina A Herysta Elmina A Herysta Esmi Warassih Warassih Pudjirahayu Ferdian, Komang Jaka Guskarnali, Guskarnali Hasmonel Ibrohim Ibrohim M. Witsa Firdaus Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo Muh. Rustamaji Muhamad Irfani Muhammad Rustamaji Muhammad Rustamaji Ndaru Satrio Ndaru Satrio Pratama Putra Sadewa Rafiqa Sari Rahmaddi Rahmaddi Reski Anwar Rio Amanda Agustin Toni Toni Toni Toni Tony Tony Winanda Kusuma Yokotani Yokotani