Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.347
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA LEX ADMINISTRATUM LEX PRIVATUM KESMAS LEX ET SOCIETATIS Hasanuddin Law Review PREPOTIF : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat
Theodorus Hendrik Willem Lumunon
Sam Ratulangi University
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

 1 
Implementasi dari Corporate Negligence dan Relevansi Quasi Economic Credentialing dalam Praktik di Rumah Sakit Swasta Theodorus Hendrik Willem Lumunon; Liju Zet Viany; Butje Tampi; Caecelia J. J. Waha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (500.778 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i01.p13

Abstract

The prevailing law of the hospital liability for every damage occured by the health professionals in hospital falls into very broad sense and leaving many critical questions about how this definition to be applied. The question addressed whether the hospital may defend it's position by proving that the negligence by the health professionals was caused beyond the hospital guidelines such as the theory of professional liability scheme?. Purpose: to explain the hospital liability based on the corporate negligence theory, and to identify the implementation of economic credential in private hospitals. Method: using the normative juridical method, through legislation approach, concepts and legal comparison and also supported by the data field such focus group discussion. Results: Health professionals can be liabiled if she/he has found deviate by the professional medical standards.The hospital was liabiled for every damage occured by the health professional based on the "vicarious liability" scheme. The medical negligence according to the perception of health law is different from the general negligence in the legal perception. The economic credentialing actually has exist with some modification such as “scheme target”, or what we called the "quasi economic credentialing". Rumah Sakit bertanggung gugat terhadap kerugian yang diakibatkan oleh tenaga kesehatan yang bekerja di rumah sakit. Konsep ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai beban pembuktian apakah pihak rumah sakit dapat mengelak dengan argumen bahwa kelalaian tenaga kesehatan itu sudah bertindak di luar skema tanggung jawab rumah sakit sebagaimana umumnya berlaku pada teori pertanggungjawaban. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan tanggung gugat rumah sakit berdasarkan teori corporate negligence, dan mengidentifikasi bagaimana pelaksanaan economic credentialing di rumah sakit swasta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan, perundang-undangan, konsep dan perbandingan hukum, dan data lapangan sebagai penunjang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan staf medis dapat di mintakan tanggung gugat apabila menyimpang dari standar profesi kedokteran. Rumah Sakit, sebagai majikan dapat dimintakan tanggung gugat atas kerugian yang dilakukan tenaga kesehatan yang bekerja di rumah sakit sebagaimana skema pertanggungan jawab vicarious liability. Kelalaian medis menurut persepsi hukum kesehatan berbeda dengan kelalaian umum persepsi hukum. Kredensial ekonomi di rumah sakit tertentu telah dilaksanakan, meskipun dalam pengertian terbatas, disebut peneliti target skema (quasi economic credentialing).
Doktrin Corporate Negligence Pertanggunggugatan Entitas Hukum Rumah Sakit di Indonesia Theodorus Hendrik Willem Lumunon; Ronny A Maramis
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p07

Abstract

Article 46 of Law No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals regulates corporate counterclaims involving hospitals as legal entities under the vicarious liability doctrine. However, these regulations do not fully align with hospitals' distinct characteristics. Hospitals have a unique structure with three functional units: the supervisory board, the board of directors, and various professional groups, each with distinct responsibilities. This writing examines issues surrounding Article 46, including whether hospitals should be held accountable for damages caused by healthcare human resources. It explores when hospital corporations should face litigation and when healthcare human resources should assume liability based on professional responsibility. Despite the clarity of Article 46's text, its application doesn't entirely consider hospitals' organizational uniqueness. The objective is to establish regulations and legal principles to address challenges in applying Article 46, contributing to an ideal concept of corporate counterclaims involving hospitals. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, including legislative analysis, conceptual exploration, case study, and comparative law. The research suggests a concept of hospital liability as a legal entity, contingent on four conditions: the hospital has an obligation based on the corporate negligence doctrine, breach of these obligations occurs, quantifiable losses result, and a demonstrable causal connection exists between the breach and resulting damages.
Co-Authors Billy J. Kepel Butje Tampi Caecelia J. J. Waha Greyti Virza Celine Antameng Herlyanty Y. A. Bawole Jeany Anita Kermite Jemmy Sondakh, Jemmy Kartini Tungkagi Liju Zet Viany Marieska Y. Waworuntu Natalia Gabriel Rantung Priscilia Octavia Rantung, Margereth Inof Riisyie Ronny A Maramis Ronny A. Maramis Veisy Anathasya Pontoh Victor Demsy Kasenda Vonny A. Wongkar Welong Seftian Surya