Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility) oleh PT. Transco Energi Utama Di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Muhammad Afif Alfianda; Busyra Azheri; Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.965

Abstract

PT. Transco Energi Utama is engaged in palm oil processing. The company was founded in 2018 and is one of the companies under PT. Incasi Raya Group. History of PT. Transco Energi Utama in distributing Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility) is not only concerned with the profits received, therefore in terms of distributing CSR PT. Transco Energi Utama wants to realize its social responsibility through careful planning. The research method used is Empirical Juridical, namely an approach based on field research to obtain primary data as the main data. In addition to field research, library research was also carried out to obtain supporting secondary data. The results of the research show that the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility by PT. Transco Energi Utama in Pesisir Selatan Regency is implemented through the Community Care Program (PPM), with the first distribution carried out in 2019. PT. Incasi Raya Group as the parent company has the authority to decide on approval of the proposed forms of programs and the amount of CSR funds that have been determined by PT. Transco Energi Utama.
Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Perumahan yang Tidak Terlaksana Sebagaimana Mestinya Kasran Harefa; Busyra Azheri; Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.971

Abstract

The legal force against the PPJB housing that is done by the P.T.Mutiara Peace made not in front of a notary in the form of a standard contract is weak and does not have a perfect legal force as the authentic act made in the presence of the notary. Such an agreement shall remain in force in that it is not contrary to the provisions of the law, the law and the common order. When the property is in the court of justice and because of its nature under the hand, then the proof is relative, that is, when the property has been admitted by the parties to its existence, the PPJB has the full legal force of proof, while for the party that does not admitt it then the power of evidence is handed over to the judge's consideration. And for them the parties of the Peace Mutiara with its buyer who perform PPJB in the presence of a notary in the form of an authentic act then the legal force is very binding and the value of the proof is perfect before the court. The position of PPJB in the sale of housing transactions between PT.Mutiara Peace with its buyer: First, that is made not in the presence of a notary in the form of a standard contract is already an agreement but its position is a preliminary agreement under the hand or called as the Preliminary Agreement for Sale of Sale. Second, for those parties that make the PPGB before the notary then the position is as an act whose nature is authentic in accordance with Article 1868 of the KUHPerdata or which is referred to as a contract of binding sale of sale.
Pendaftaran Tanah Jalan Umum Sebagai Aset Publik di Kota Pariaman Fara Ditha; Kurnia Warman; Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.981

Abstract

Public road land is a public asset whose control lies with the state. In accordance with Article 9 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, registration of land whose object is state land is carried out by recording the plot of land in the land register. The State Finance Law and the State Treasury Law provide a different understanding. The central and regional governments are required to certify all land they control without distinguishing between private domains or public domains attached to the objects being registered, so that control over public road land which should belong to the state, changes to the property of a government agency. The research method used is a normative empirical approach which is descriptive qualitative in nature. The results and discussion show that the basis for consideration by the Pariaman City Regional Government for registering public road land is based on Pariaman City Regional Regulation Number 14 of 2017 concerning Management of Regional Property and Pariaman Mayor Regulation Number 58 of 2019 concerning Technical Instructions for Management of Regional Property which was born from a KPK Instruction . Initially, the status of public road land in land administration was state land (TN), but because it was registered in KIB A, the status changed to Hak Pakai (P). The process for registering public road land is the same as registering land for government agencies whose objects are used to carry out the duties of the government agency concerned.
Kepastian Hukum Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli terhadap Tanah yang Belum Turun Waris di Kota Padang Febry Rahmdani; Mardenis Mardenis; Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1004

Abstract

The impediment to make a sale act by the ppat because its conditions are not met, of course, will create uncertainty for the parties who conduct the sale. The agreement is a binding agreement. The parties entered into an agreement for binding the sale of the land which has not been inherited depending on several factors such as the buyer needs time to carry out the payment of the sale price while the seller takes time to process the inheritance certificate of the right to the land, the purchaser has paid the purchase price but the unity of the rights to the ground has not yet been made to inherit, and/or payment of income tax (PPh) and customs duties on land and building (BPHTB) have not been issued by the parties. The contract of sale of land that has not been inherited is based on the agreement of the parties, which is then continued with the application for the drafting of an act before a notary, the approval of the law by a notar, the submission and inspection of documents, the verification of certificates of the right to the land, the preparation and drawing of acts, and the signing of the act. The Civil Procedure Act against land not inherited made before a notary has legal certainty, because the notary as a public official authorized to make an authentic act subject to the regulations of the laws and the code of ethics of the office of the notar has ensured the validity of the civil procedure act against land that has not been made in heritage made against him and by referring it to a civil proceeding act against the land noted in the notarial act can provide legal protection to the parties in the event of legal protection of an authoritative act.
Kewenangan Partai Politik dalam Mengusulkan Pemberhentian dan Penggantian Antar Waktu Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (Studi Kasus Pemberhentian Nofrizon Sebagai Anggota DPRD Sumbar 2019-2024) Muammar Kadafi Siregar; Azmi Fendri; Hengki Andora
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (Mei 202
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v6i4.859

Abstract

On April 27 2023, the Democratic Party DPP issued DPP Decree No. 104/SK/DPP.PD/IV/2023 concerning the Dismissal of Democratic Party Members. Nofrizon was terminated because he violated Organizational Regulation Number 01/PO/DPP.PD/VII/2019 Article 5 Paragraph 4 that Democratic Party members are obliged to obey and carry out the decisions of the faction leadership without exception. Then, through a letter from the Democratic Party of West Sumatra Province DPD No.12/ext/DPD.PD/SB/V/2023, dated 29 May 2023, the Democratic Party stated that Mr. Nofrizon had been permanently terminated as a member of the Democratic Party and proposed an interim replacement (PAW ) Member of the West Sumatra Province DPRD from the Democratic Party Fraction for the 2019-2024 period. The legal basis used as a process for the temporary termination and placement of West Sumatra Province DPRD members is Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government Article 139 Paragraph (2) DPRD members are dismissed from time to time for reasons as specified in letters e, h and i as following e. Proposed by the political party in accordance with the provisions of the statutory regulations, h. Dismissed from being a member of the political party in accordance with the provisions of the statutory regulations; and I. Become a member of another Political Party. To answer this problem, it is necessary to formulate it into three problem formulations. First, what is the process for the interim termination of DPRD members? Second, what is the interim placement process for DPRD members? Third, what is the authority of political parties in promising the dismissal and temporary placement of DPRD members? This research is a type of legal research using a sociological juridical legal research approach. The results of this research show that the temporary dismissal of DPRD members due to such termination can be carried out through a decision of the Honorary Board and/or through a proposal from a political party. Bro. Nofrizon, S. Sos was temporarily dismissed as a member of the West Sumatra Province DPRD from the Democratic Fraction. This interim suspension was at the suggestion of the Political Party (Democratic Party) due to a change of party and not a personal resignation, through the Democratic Party DPP decision letter No.104/SK/DPP.PD/V/2023. The interim replacement process for Provincial DPRD members cannot be separated from the process of dismissal of DPRD members which occurs first. Political parties have the authority to stop the temporary dismissal of DPRD members, but the process of guaranteeing candidates for interim replacement names for Provincial DPRD members is the attributive authority of the Provincial KPU.
Fungsi Pengawasan DPRD Kabupaten Pasaman Barat Terhadap Pelaksanaan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan Laporan Keuangan Oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Theo Satria D; Khairani Khairani; Hengki Andora
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (Novembe
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v6i1.809

Abstract

In carrying out its supervisory function, the DPRD in this case describes the BPK's findings according to its authority. It is important to complete follow-up actions on BPK audit results. In this research, the formulation of the problem is: 1) DPRD supervision of the follow-up to the results of the audit of the BPK's financial reports; 2) Further action on the results of the West Pasaman Regency DPRD's supervision of the results of the BPK's financial report audit; 3) urge not to follow up on the results of the audit of the BPK's financial reports. The research uses an empirical juridical approach, descriptive analytical in nature. Data was obtained from legal materials and interviews, then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this research are 1) DPRD supervision starts from the BPK submitting the Audit Results Report until there is a response and evidence of follow-up from the Inspectorate which is then reviewed by the BPK; 2) The follow-up to the results of the West Pasaman Regency DPRD's supervision of the 2020 BPK LHP found indications of losses from official travel expenses, which had been deposited in the Regional Treasury; 3) The DPRD Secretary provides written sanctions to officials regarding the discovery of losses in official travel expenses that do not correspond to actual conditions.
Substantive Justice for Indigenous Peoples through the Application of the Principle of Free Prior and Informed Consent (Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines) Rahmi Jasim; Hengki Andora
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6062

Abstract

In order to protect the rights of indigenous peoples in Indonesia and the Philippines, this study aims to examine the connection between substantive justice and the FPIC framework. Since Indonesia has not officially adopted Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), there is a major difference between the two countries' legal systems in this respect. On top of that, it's a part of the Philippines' Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act (IPRA). Methods used in the study include conceptual frameworks, legal philosophy, comparative procedures, comparative approaches to policy and law, and normative (doctrinal) approaches to analysis. In spite of difficulties, the Philippines demonstrates a more thorough application of FPIC, but the results reveal that Indonesia's implementation is shallow and does not effectively protect the rights of indigenous groups. Separate bodies, such as the National Commission for the Rights and Protection of Indigenous Peoples (KNHPMA), should be established in Indonesia so that FPIC may be formally incorporated into laws, according to the paper. By fully integrating FPIC in Indonesia, we may achieve equity, inclusivity, and sustainable development based on respect for local knowledge. This might reduce agricultural disputes and improve the protection of indigenous peoples' human rights.
Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Dalam Pembangunan Perumahan di Kota Bukittinggi Sovia Oktarima; Zefrizal Nurdin; Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/5dxppe10

Abstract

Syarat wajib dalam pembelian rumah agar berkekuatan hukum antara lain adanya Akta Jual Beli (AJB). Developer perumahan tidak dapat melaksanakan AJB karena rumah yang dibangun belum ada, sehingga disiasati dengan cara melakukan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli (PPJB), untuk selanjutnya nanti dilakukan akad proses AJB dan pembuatan sertifikat tanah dan bangunannya. Dalam prakteknya PPJB yang dibuat tidak sesuai dengan KUHPerdata dan PP 12 tahun 2021 Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Perumahan Dan Kawasan Permukiman. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah mengapa Notaris membuatkan PPJB yang tidak sesuai dengan PP Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaraan dan Kawasan Permukiman di Kota Bukitinggi? Bagaimana bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen di Kota Bukittinggi? Mengapa pembeli belum memperoleh sertipikat atas hak milik atas rumah yang dibelinya kepada pengembang di Kota Bukittinggi?, metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Yuridis Empiris, teknik pengumpulan data dengan wawancara dan observasi, hasil dari penelitian ini adalah alasan Notaris membuatkan PPJB yang tidak sesuai dengan PP 12 tahun 2021 karena Notaris tidak mengetahui adanya aturan tersebut dan Notaris telah menganggap sah isi perjanjian tanpa memperhatikan syarat objektif suatu perjanjian. Bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli Berdasarkan UndangUndang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen di Kota Bukittinggi yakni pihak pembeli belum sepenuhnya mendapatkan uangnya kembali dan mendapatkan ganti rugi sesuai dengan nilai yang dirugikan oleh pihak Developer Kenapa pihak pembeli belum mendapatkan sertipikat dikarenakan, pihak Sertipikat sendiri belum dipecah/masih induk, jika sudah lunas pembayarannya maka baru bisa dipecah dan pihak pembeli bisa mendapatkan Sertipikat. Jadi sertipikat tersebut dititipikan ke kantor Notaris, tindakan Notaris dalam menerima penyimpanan sertipikat hak atas tanah sebagai sikap netral Notaris terhadap para pihak untuk menjamin kepastian dan perlindungan hukum.
Reconstruction Model in Filling the Regional Head Position from the Perspective of State Administrative Law and The Fourth Principle of Pancasila Zulwisman Zulwisman; Hengki Andora
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Ipso - May
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/74jxr537

Abstract

This article analyzes the process of filling regional head positions in Indonesia and reconstructs its model from the perspective of State Administrative Law and the fourth principle of Pancasila. The research uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. The results indicate that the regulation of filling regional head positions has evolved toward a more structured direct electoral democracy, but still faces fundamental weaknesses, namely the dominance of political parties in the nomination process, high political costs, money politics, overly procedural democracy, single candidates, and the widespread use of acting regional heads. These conditions indicate that the current system does not fully align with the principles of State Administrative Law and the values of the fourth principle of Pancasila. This research proposes a reconstruction of a model for filling regional head positions that is administrative-deliberative in nature, with electoral legitimacy maintained through more proportional access to nominations, strengthening public deliberative forums, and stricter restrictions on the appointment of acting regional heads.
Challenges in the Implementation of Free Prior and Informed Consent for Indigenous Peoples in Indonesia's National Legal Regulation Rahmi Jasim; Saldi Isra; Kurnia Warman; Hengki Andora
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 7 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i7.50779

Abstract

This research discusses the challenges of implementing Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) for indigenous peoples in national legal arrangements in Indonesia. FPIC is a principle that gives indigenous peoples the right to give consent to policies that affect their territories and resources freely, prior to full information, and without pressure. Although the FPIC rights of indigenous peoples are implicitly described and regulated in various national regulations, such as the 1945 Constitution, Forestry Law, Village Law, and environmental regulations slot zeus, these arrangements do not necessarily guarantee the protection of indigenous peoples' rights over their customary territories. Explicit legal arrangements are needed to guarantee indigenous peoples' FPIC rights over their customary territories. This is because in its implementation, the application of FPIC rights still faces various challenges such as conflicts of interest with the State's Right to Control (HMN), low understanding in the field, and gender injustice being the main obstacles. This study uses a normative juridical approach to identify differences between international and national legal arrangements, and offers recommendations to improve the protection and implementation of FPIC in Indonesia. The research emphasizes the importance of explicit legal arrangements to achieve justice, prosperity and harmony between indigenous peoples and the government.