Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Al-Ulum Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Farabi Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal Universitas Paramadina Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah Ulumuna
Sofyan A.P. Kau
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Sultan Amai Gorontalo
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Mizan (e-Journal)

 1 
PERKEMBANGAN PEMIKIRAN HUKUM ISLAM A.P. Kau, Sofyan
Al-Mizan Vol 9, No 1 (2013): Juni 2013
Publisher : IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini memaparkan dinamika perkembangan pemikiran hukum Islam baik dari sisi karakteristik maupun coraknya. Pemikiran hukum Islam telah menghasilkan empat produk hukum, yaitu fikih, fatwa, qadha maupun qanun. Keempat produk hukum Islam tidak bersifat statis, melainkan bersifat dinamis. Dinamika pemikiran hukum Islam bersifat historis dan sosiologis. Disebut historis, karena hukum Islam lahir bukan dalam ruang yang hampa budaya, melainkan dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor historis. Disebut sosiologis, karena hukum Islam lahir untuk merespon problem sosial yang dihadapi. Demikian historis dan sosiologisnya sehingga masing-masing keempat produk hukum Islam tersebut memiliki karakteristik dan corak tersendiri. Fikih ditandai dengan keragaman opini hukum, tetapi tidak mengikat ketentuan hukumnya; sama dengan fatwa. Hanya saja fatwa lebih bersifat induktif, karena ia merupakan respon atas realitas sosial; berbeda dengan fikih yang bersifat deduktif. Qadha sebagai putusan pengadilan bersifat menginkat bagi yang berperkara; sama menginkatnya dengan qanun (perundang-undangan). Sebagai sebuah undang-undang, maka setiap negeri muslim tidak selalu sama ketentuan hukum dan perundang-undangannya. Poligami di Indonesia dibolehkan, tetapi diharamkan di Tunisia. Faktor sosial politik mempengaruhi perbedaan produk perundangan-perundangan. Keempat produk hukum Islam ini ada yang bercorak tekstualistik, substansial, moderat, rasional dan bahkan radikal. Karakteristik dan corak hukum Islam ini sesungguhnya refleksi logis atas dinamika masyarakat yang meniscayakan pula adanya pemikiran hukum Islam secara dinamis. Dinamika pemikiran hukum Islam tersebut dibentuk oleh ijtihad.
FIKIH TASAMUH: MERAJUT HARMONI DALAM KERAGAMAN PENDAPAT A.P. Kau, Sofyan; Suleman, Zulkarnain
Al-Mizan Vol 11, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015
Publisher : IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Interpretation and understanding of the authoritative sources of Islam (Quran and Hadith) are not single, but diverse. Therefore, the diversity and differences understanding are inevitable and historical. In the midst of diversity and difference are needed openness, respect and it don’t negate the different opinions, and distanced himself from the claim of truth single opinion is a moral imperative to harmony. This paper offers five principles for knitting harmony intended, namely: mandatory precedence (Wajib) over the Sunnah; promoting scientific paradigm on religious, agreed on the principle (qathi-usul) and tolerant on the particulate matter (zhanni-furu), emphasizes the relationship to the debate; and did not highlight his own opinion as he cornered a different opinion. These five principles of fiqh tasamuh (jurisprudence of tolerant).
Kritik atas Fikih Lintas Agama: Studi atas Pemikiran Kaum Revivalis Siti Hardianti Liputo; Sofyan A. P. Kau
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2019): Al-Mizan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (543.144 KB) | DOI: 10.30603/am.v15i1.975

Abstract

This paper explains the revivalist Islamic criticism of the views of the Paramadina Writers Team which permits interfaith marriages and permissibility of inheritance of different religions. This research is a library research with the main data source is the book Fiqh Lintas Agama: Membangun Masyarakat Inklusif-Pluralis. The results showed that Islamic revivalists argued that the history of Mu’azd and Muawiyah which was used as a reference by the Paramadina Writers Team did not agree on its validity compared to the history which forbids a Muslim from inheriting infidels. Whereas giving precedence to an agreed proposition of validity is more important to be held against than an argument whose validity is not agreed upon. Choosing a majority opinion over the opinion of a minority is more prioritized. The case where the majority of scholars forbid interfaith marriages is haram because of the textual statements of the verse, except marriages with the ahl al-kitab. That skill is also an emergency. Even the adverse effects of interfaith marriages must take precedence over benefits.
Co-Authors Ajub Ishak Ibrahim, Zumiyati Sanu Irwan Salleh, Mohd Afandi Siti Hardianti Liputo Suleman, Zulfitri Zulkarnain Suleman, Zulkarnain Tungkagi, Donald Qomaidiasyah Wibawa, Nazar Husain Hadi Pranata Zulkarnain Sulaeman Zulkarnain Suleman Zulkarnain Suleman Zulkarnain Suleman