Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Law Research Review Quarterly
Muhammad Azil Maskur
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
MENELISIK TINDAK PIDANA YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN KERAHASIAAN INTELIJEN NEGARA Muhammad Azil Maskur
Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2017): Qistie Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/jqi.v10i2.2072

Abstract

Tindak pidana yang terkait dengan intelijen negara telah diatur dalam KUHP dan Undang-undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2011 tentang Intelijen Negara. Pengaturan dalam KUHP bersifat umum terbingkai dalam bab yang terkait dengan kejahatan terhadap keamanan negara dan bab yang terkait dengan membuka rahasia negara. Sedangkan pengaturan dalam UU Intelijen Negara bersifat khusus yang diatur dalam Pasal 44, 45, 46 dan 47. Pidana maksimal yang dapat dijatuhkan adalah 10 tahun penjara dan dapat ditambah 1/3 jika dilakukan oleh intelijen negara dalam keadaan perang. Ada beberapa kelemahan yuridis pengaturan tindak pidana terkait intelijen negara tersebut, sehingga perlu ada pembenahan dalam kebijakan formulasi pada masa yang akan datang. Pembaharuan tersebut terkait dengan kualifikasi delik, pengaturan terkait permufakatan jahat, pengaturan pidana jika tidak dibayar oleh korporasi. Kata kunci: tindak pidana, intelijen negara.
Renewal of Criminal Provisions in the Employment Cluster Job Creation Law Ratih Damayanti; Masyhar, Ali; Rodiyah, Rodiyah; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Ahmad Gelora Mahardika; Putri Balqis Nuril Hakim
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v8i1.19288

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the reform of criminal provisions in the Job Creation Law concerning labor. The amendments, which eliminate and modify criminal provisions, raise concerns about the potential erosion of legal enforcement regarding labor rights violations. This research employs a normative legal approach, focusing on conceptual frameworks and legislative regulations. Data were collected through literature review from primary legal sources, including relevant labor laws, and secondary sources such as legal books and journals. The findings indicate that while the reform of criminal provisions has positive impacts, it also presents negative consequences due to the regulation of these provisions outside the labor law framework. This duality underscores the need for careful consideration in balancing legal protections for workers with the objectives of efficient law enforcement in the evolving labor landscape.
Legal Protection for Underage Rape Victims Who Experience Forced Marriage With The Perpetarator Tristan, Jose; Muhammad Azil Maskur
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/llrq.v11i2.27199

Abstract

Forced marriage, particularly involving underage victims of sexual violence, remains a pressing issue in Indonesia’s legal and human rights landscape. Despite the enactment of Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes, which criminalizes forced and child marriage—including those justified by cultural traditions—challenges persist in enforcement and victim protection. This study examines the legal safeguards available to child rape victims forced into marriage with their perpetrators, evaluates the effectiveness of Indonesia’s legal system in addressing sexual violence, and explores necessary legal reforms to enhance justice for survivors. By applying a normative descriptive approach, this research identifies gaps in policy, law enforcement, and institutional support, emphasizing the need for stronger victim protection mechanisms, law enforcement consistency, and multi-sector collaboration to ensure comprehensive recovery and justice
Juvenile Justice in Comparative Perspective: A Study of Indonesian State Law and Islamic Law Adrian Hadiputra; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Arifin, Ridwan; Ikram Amrullah; Hibatullah Maajid
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Law, Morality, and Identity in Muslim Societies: A Contemporary Legal Discourse
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ciils.v3i2.31396

Abstract

This study examines juvenile justice systems through a comparative analysis between Indonesian State Law and Islamic Law, focusing on the treatment and legal protection of juvenile offenders. The Indonesian legal framework, which follows a secular approach, offers specific regulations for juvenile justice under the Juvenile Justice System Law (No. 11 of 2012). This law emphasizes rehabilitation and diversion, ensuring that juvenile offenders are treated differently from adults, with a focus on reintegration into society. In contrast, Islamic law, rooted in the principles of Sharia, offers a distinct approach to juvenile justice. While Islamic law does not have a unified legal code for juvenile offenders, its application emphasizes the protection of minors from harsh punishments and prioritizes their rehabilitation. Islamic legal scholars agree on the importance of age and maturity in determining the level of responsibility for a juvenile’s actions. The concept of "ta'zir" (discretionary punishment) plays a significant role in ensuring that juvenile offenders are treated with fairness, aiming at their moral and social reform. This comparative study highlights the similarities and differences between the two legal systems in addressing juvenile crime, considering the broader cultural and legal contexts that shape juvenile justice policies in Indonesia and Islamic law. The paper explores how these legal frameworks balance punishment with rehabilitation and the role of community involvement in reforming juvenile offenders. The study contributes to understanding the potential for cross-jurisdictional insights in improving juvenile justice practices, emphasizing the need for a more unified and human-centric approach in dealing with young offenders.
Penal Policy: Decriminalization of Election Crimes in Indonesia Muhammad Azil Maskur; Pujiyono; Irma Cahyaningtyas; Fikri, Wildan Azkal; Zadataqi, Faikar Sir
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.8831

Abstract

Several election crime articles in Law No. 7/2017 are suspected of causing injustice to subjects who commit election infractions, particularly civil servants, village heads, and election organizers. The potential for injustice arises because the imposition of election crimes on civil servants, village heads, and election organizers causes all three to receive double jeopardy, although double jeopardy is contrary to the constitution and human rights, meaning that enacting election crimes is unfair to all three. These intrigues should be resolved immediately to achieve legal justice for all three. To answer these dynamics, further research needs to be carried out to find out where the injustice lies and the appropriate solution to overcome it. This research utilizes normative legal or doctrinal to examine injustice and find appropriate advisers. The penal policy approach is the right measure to eliminate injustice in election crime articles in Law No. 7/2017. This injustice is precisely in Articles 490, 494, and 546 of Law No. 7/2017 which regulates criminal sanctions for civil servants, village heads, and election organizers who commit election crimes. Decriminalization of Articles 490, 494, and 546 of Law No. 7/2017 needs to be applied because the application of these three articles has caused civil servants, villages, and election organizers to receive double jeopardy, while double jeopardy is contrary to the constitution and human rights so that the application of these three articles is real injustice.
Co-Authors Adrian Hadiputra Ahmad Gelora Mahardika Ali Masyhar Fikri, Wildan Azkal Hibatullah Maajid Ikram Amrullah Irma Cahyaningtyas Pujiyono Putri Balqis Nuril Hakim Ratih Damayanti Ridwan Arifin Rodiyah - Tristan, Jose Zadataqi, Faikar Sir