Nur Hidayat
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Efektifitas Pembacaan Buku Cerita Bergambar sebagai Metode Pencegahan Kekerasan Seks Pada Anak Choiriyah Widyasari; Siti Zuriah Ariatmi; Nur Hidayat
Jurnal VARIDIKA Volume 33, No. 1 June 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (301.19 KB) | DOI: 10.23917/varidika.v33i1.15335

Abstract

Penelitian ini secara umum bertujuan untuk mengukur hasil belajar anak mengenai pemahaman terhadap Kekerasan Seksual pada Anak (KSA) baik yang diberikan metode storytelling maupun metode ceramah. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan model eksperimen yang dilaksanakan selama satu tahun. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa TK Al Islam Jamsaren Surakarta dan TK BA Aisyiyah Grogol Sukoharjo. Pengambilan subjek dilakukan secara random sampling, yaitu sampel diambil secara acak (random). Selanjutnya data-data yang terkumpul akan dianalisis menggunakan SEM (Structural Equation Modelling). Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa hasil belajar anak mengenai KSA menunjukkan bahwa kelompok I (mean= 22.75) anak memiliki pemahaman mengenai KSA yang lebih tinggi jika dibanding dengan kelompok II (mean= 20.28). Pemberian perlakuan berupa metode storytelling (X) dibandingkan dengan metode ceramah (Y) memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda secara signifikan dalam mengembangkan hasil belajar anak terhadap KSA anak siswa. Hal ini membuktikan pemberian perlakuan dengan metode storytelling lebih efektif dalam mengembangkan pemahaman anak mengenai KSA.
Publishing a research paper in reputable journals: doctoral students’ perspectives Nur Hidayat; Slamet Setiawan; Syafiul Anam
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Vol 13, No 2: April 2024
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25701

Abstract

This study aimed to enquire about the English foreign language (EFL) doctoral students’ perspective, especially in the non-English department, concerning the Indonesian government policy, which obliges an article published in a reputable international journal as a requirement to receive a doctoral degree. Their challenges in publishing their papers in Scopus or Web of Science (WOS)-indexed journals and their resolutions were also analyzed. A mixed-methods technique was used to obtain quantitative and qualitative information. The study consisted of 57 respondents, comprising 25 males and 32 females, who were EFL doctoral students of education departments from five universities. The purposive sampling method with several criteria was used to determine the study participants. Data were then collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Subsequently, the findings showed that the policy of publishing a paper in Scopus or WOS-indexed journals to obtain an EFL doctoral degree was burdensome to the majority of the students. Other findings showed that the students faced several challenges in publishing their papers in these journals, including language problems, cost of publication, journal selection, lack of experience, duration to publish, writing difficulties, revising, and stress. The actions to resolve these challenges were also provided in this study.
Understanding the Difference between Authentic Assessment and Traditional Assessment Farida Nur Fatinah; Muamaroh; Mauly H.H; Yeny Prastiwi; Nur Hidayat
JPGENUS: Jurnal Pendidikan Generasi Nusantara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Generasi Nusantara (JPGENUS), Edisi Januari-Juni 2025
Publisher : Samudra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61787/ctg91t98

Abstract

This qualitative study aims to investigate the differences between traditional and authentic assessments in education in order to improve teaching and learning practices. Using a descriptive literature study method, this study analyses various relevant academic sources to identify the strengths and weaknesses of both types of assessments. The results show that authentic assessments are more effective in measuring critical thinking and problem-solving skills, while traditional assessments are more suitable for evaluating memorization and basic skills. The conclusion of the study recommends the use of a combination of both types of assessments to support deeper learning and better educational outcomes.