Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

ANALISIS TINGKAT KEPUASAN NELAYAN TERHADAP FUNGSI PELABUHAN PERIKANAN NUSANTARA PEKALONGAN BERDASARKAN PERATURAN MENTERI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN NOMOR PER.08/MEN/2012 Kurniawan, Fandy; Triarso, Imam; Kurohman, Faik
Journal of Fisheries Resources Utilization Management and Technology Vol 6, No 3: Agustus 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (180.166 KB)

Abstract

PPN Pekalongan merupakan pusat pendaratan ikan yang berlokasi di Pekalongan, Jawa Tengah. Pelabuhan perikanan bukan hanya menyediakan fasilitas untuk aktivitas pendaratan, maupun pengolahan perindustrian hasil tangkapan tetapi juga memberikan pelayanan yang optimal terhadap pengguna pelabuhan perikanan khususnya nelayan. Pemerintah telah menetapkan Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan nomor PER.08/MEN/2012 tentang fungsi Pelabuhan Perikanan Nusantara. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi kondisi fasilitas pelabuhan, menganalisis tingkat kepuasan nelayan terhadap fungsi Pelabuhan Perikanan Nusantara Pekalongan berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Nomor PER.08/MEN/2012. Penelitian dilakukan pada tanggal 9 -14 Mei 2016. Metode penelitian adalah metode deskriptif dengan mendiskripsikan kepuasan nelayan sebanyak 45orang terhadap fungsi pelabuhan. Analisis data menggunakan Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) untuk mengetahui besarnya tingkat kepuasan nelayan dan Importance and Performance Analysis (IPA) untuk mengetahui atribut fungsi yang dianggap penting oleh nelayan. Terdapat 20 atribut fungsi yang diteliti tercantum dalam Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan nomor PER.08/MEN/2012. Tingkat kepuasan nelayan terhadap fungsi pelabuhan menunjukkan nilai 64,2 % (cukup puas). 
Validitas dan Realibilitas Instrumen Teori Pilihan Karir Holland di Indonesia Anggraini, Weni; Kurniawan, Fandy; Susilawati, Susilawati; Hasna, Afra
Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy
Publisher : Kuras Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51214/bocp.v2i2.34

Abstract

Validity and reliability are the main topics in every research instruments. It is important how to create research instrument that is connected to the construct being measured. In this article, the authors tested the validity and reliability of Holland's career instrument Indonesian version. The participants involved are in the period of career preparation and choice, within an educational institution or a job, but has not yet had satisfaction with their career. The participants' age range from 15 to 27 years. The validity test is carried out using the conventional validity type, where the item is declared valid if the correlation coefficient is ≥ 0.3. The results showed 43 items were declared valid and 5 items were declared invalid while the reliability coefficient found is 0.906. Based on the results, Holland's career instrument Indonesian version in a good instrument to measure career preparation and career choice.
Developing of annual program guidance and counseling in higher education Kurniawan, Fandy
COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education Vol. 3 No. 3 (2018)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education, and Therapy & Indonesian Counselor Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23916/0020180317130

Abstract

This study aims to develop and determine the feasibility of the annual program of guidance and counseling in higher education. The method used in this research is Research and Development (R & D) Research and development carried out by adopting the concept of research and development by Borg and Gall. Based on product test using inter-rater agreement models, it is concluded that the product has fulfilled the content validity of 0.76 or can be categorized as valid (good). Furthermore, based on the results of Focus Group Discussion (FGD), it is concluded that the product can be categorized well, but needs to be refined by making improvements given.
Differences in academic achievement and psychological well-being based on major selection status Anggraini, Weni; Suwidagdho, Dhanang; Sari, Arlina; Kurniawan, Fandy; Hananto, Ipung
Counsenesia Indonesian Journal Of Guidance and Counseling Vol 7 No 1 (2026): COUNSENESIA 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Universitas Tunas Pembangunan Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36728/cijgc.v7i1.6689

Abstract

Choosing a college major is one of the most important decisions in a student's educational journey. In reality, however, many Indonesian students enter their study programs not based on personal interest, but due to exam-score requirements, family expectations, or limited options. A mismatch between interests and major is related to students' psychological well-being. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in psychological well-being (PWB) and academic achievement (GPA) between Biology students who chose their major based on interest and those who did not, in terms of psychological well-being (PWB) and academic achievement (GPA). Using a quantitative comparative design, data were collected from 90 Biology students. PWB was measured with Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being, and GPA was obtained from official university records. After confirming normality and homogeneity of variance, an independent samples t-test was applied for PWB and a Mann-Whitney U test for GPA. The independent samples t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, t(88) = 4.361, p < .001. And the Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference in GPA between the two groups, U = 1003, z = ?0.077, p >.001. These findings indicate that major selection driven by personal interest is meaningfully linked to students' psychological well-being, though not to their academic grades. The implications for academic guidance and counseling practice are discussed.