Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Peran Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum Menghadapi Transnational Crimes Di Era Globalisasi Lumbuun, T. Gayus
LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 1 (2004)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime was adopted by the General Assembly at its Millennium meeting in November 2000. It will be opened for signature at a high level conference in Palermo, Italy in December 2000. it is the first legally binding United Nations instrument in the field of crime. It must be signed and ratified by 40 countries before it comes into force. States party to the Convention would be required to establish in their domestic laws four criminal offences: 1. participation in an organized criminal group; 2. money laundering; 3. corruption; and 4. obstruction of justice. It is hoped that upon ratification the Convention will emerge as the main tool  of the international community for fighting transnational crime.
Legal Due Diligence Dalam Lingkup Hukum Administrasi Negara Lumbuun, T. Gayus
LAW REVIEW Vol 5, No 2 (2005)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal due diligence in the scope of acquiring venture license is an act to find information and fact required to obtain the said license. This writing describes three problems related to due diligence in business license. First, that business license due diligence is an act in its own right in order to form a business venture. On the other hand, however, this kind of due diligence can also be part of a general due diligence that will be used for, among  other things, merger and acquisition. Second, object of a due diligence for business venture license is prescribed as conditions that have to be met by applicant. This study shows that there is an overlapping and inconsistencies in the said conditions. Third, an applicant of business venture license often faces constraints in his/her endeavor to obtain license. This research is a normative and empirical study with the characteristic of descriptive and explanatory.
MEKANISME PENINDAKAN TERHADAP ANGGOTA DPR YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (REPRESSON MECHANISM AGAINST PARLIAMENT MEMBERS WHO ENGAGE IN CORRUPTION) Lumbuun, T. Gayus
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 8, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Juni 2011
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v8i2.354

Abstract

Pengkajian mengenai mekanisme penindakan terhadap Anggota DPR yangmelakukan tindak pidana korupsi dipandang perlu didasarkan pada beberapapertimbangan, yaitu pertama bahwa lembaga DPR RI saat ini berada pada posisitertinggi dalam daftar kasus korupsi. Kedua, upaya pemberantasan korupsimerupakan komitmen bersama yang harus menjadi prioritas. Hasil kajian inimenunjukkan bahwa keterlibatan Anggota DPR RI dalam tindak pidana korupsikarena secara normatif terjadi perluasan subyek pelaku tindak pidana korupsitermasuk Anggota DPR sebagai penyelenggara negara, serta penekanan padatindak pidana korupsi sebagai tindak pidana formil dan tidak perlu adanyakerugian keuangan negara dan perekonomian negara yang nyata. Mekanismeperijinan sebagai bagian dari penindakan terhadap Anggota DPR RI untuk kasustindak pidana korupsi tidaklah mutlak. Mekanisme perijinan ini penting untukmelindungi hak-hak dan kepentingan Anggota DPR. Kajian ini sampai padasaran agar rumusan mengenai tindakan terhadap Anggota DPR RI dalamUndang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2009 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD dan DPRD(MD3) dan Peraturan Tata Tertib perlu lebih lengkap dan rinci.
The Responsibilities of the Board of Directors in Limited Liability Companies: A Comparative Analysis of the Business Judgment Rule in the United States, the Netherlands, and Indonesia Sinaga, Viator Harlen; Lumbuun, T. Gayus; Latief, Abdul; Budiman, Anwar
Justice Voice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v3i1.1134

Abstract

Civil liability of directors involves managing and representing limited liability companies under the doctrine of the business judgment rule, which originated in the United States within the common law system and is examined in civil cases. In contrast, Indonesia, following the civil law system, holds directors of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) accountable for company mismanagement that leads to state losses, typically addressed in criminal cases, such as corruption. However, this responsibility is also linked to the business judgment rule. Directors make business decisions aligned with the company’s goals and objectives (intra vires), but such decisions can also result in breaches of fiduciary duties, leading to company losses. The business judgment rule, as practiced in the United States, is reflected in Law No. 40/2007 and influenced by the Dutch Civil Code. Directors’ actions that result in losses are generally not subject to liability, as long as these actions are executed in accordance with their fiduciary duties and the principles of the business judgment rule.
Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Medik Bagi Tenaga Medis dalam Hukum Kesehatan: Studi Perbandingan Hukum di Indonesia, Belanda dan Britania Raya Delviana, Nurmaida; Lumbuun, T. Gayus; Rokhmat, Rokhmat; P.H., Agustinus; Suswantoro, Tri Agus
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 24, No 3 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v24i3.5575

Abstract

The realization of a country's national development goals is a measure of a country's success, namely through law enforcement and a good health index of its citizens in that country. This research specifically discusses the enforcement of health law where it is not only looked at from the perspective of the laws that apply in Indonesia, but a comparison is made of the resolution of problems in health law that arise as a result of actions carried out by medical personnel that are related to their competence (unprofessionalism: medical errors in the form of omission, negligence, and/or intentional) which resulted in lawsuits and lawsuits based on legal provisions in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. The research method used is prescriptive analysis and qualitative approach data analysis. The research results show that the settlement of lawsuits, especially the settlement of medical cases in Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, is currently still within the jurisdiction of the general courts; in Indonesia it is regulated in Law Number 2 of 1986 concerning General Courts along with amendments to the two Laws in Law Number 49 of 2009; in the Netherlands it is regulated in the Judicial Organization Act, the Judicial Sector (Funding) Decree of 2005, and the Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 2002; whereas in the United Kingdom it is based on the Criminal Procedure Rules 2020 and Criminal Practice Directions 2023