Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Musyawarah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Beda Agama: Avidence Based Solution From Indonesia Akhmad Kamil Rizani
El-Mashlahah Vol 10, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PALANGKA RAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/maslahah.v10i2.2063

ABSTRACTInheritance in Islam is known as the Faraidh, the science that regulates the distribution of inheritance. The distribution of inheritance given to heirs in the process it can take be without dispute or with dispute. Settlement of inheritance disputes is common, but it is different in the case of a family that has differences in religious beliefs. One of the barrier factors of inheritance in Islam is different religions, namely the existence of religious differences between the heir from and the inheritor. Settlement of disputes with the concept of deliberation is believed to be able to solve problems that tend to occur in the era of this century. The purpose of this research is to provide solutions to the problems of heirs of different religions so that the implementation of inheritance can be resolved without a dispute. This research method used descriptive-qualitative method, the writer will trace and analyze deliberations as an alternative to resolving disputes of diffrent religions. The results of this research is deliberations can be used as an alternative solution to the resolution of disputes between different religions by prioritizing the public good.Keywords: Islamic inheritance, Deliberation, and Difference in Religion.INTISARIKewarisan Islam dikenal dengan istilah Ilmu Faraidh, yaitu ilmu yang mengatur tentang pembagian harta waris. Pembagian harta warisan yang diberikan kepada ahli waris dalam prosesnya dapat berlangsung tanpa sengketa atau dengan sengketa. Penyelesaian sengketa waris banyak terjadi, namun beda halnya dengan kasus sebuah keluarga yang memiliki perbedaan dalam keyakinan keagamaan. Salah satu faktor penghalang kewarisan dalam Islam ialah berbeda agama, yaitu adanya perbedaan agama yang menjadi kepercayaan antara orang yang mewarisi dengan orang yang mewariskan. Penyelesaian sengketa dengan konsep musyawarah diyakini mampu menyelesaikan masalah yang cenderung terjadi di era abad ini. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memberikan solusi terhadap permasalahan ahli waris yang berbeda agama sehingga pelaksanaan waris dapat diselesaikan tanpa adanya sengketa. Metode penelitian ini adalah menggunakan metode deskriptif-kualitatif. Dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif-kualitatif, penulis akan melakukan pelacakan dan analisis terhadap musyawarah sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa beda agama. Hasil penelitian ini adalah musyawarah dapat digunakan sebagai sebuah solusi alternatif penyelesaian sengketa waris beda agama dengan mengedepankan kemaslahatan umum.Kata Kunci: Waris Islam, Musyawarah dan Beda Agama.

Musyawarah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Beda Agama: Avidence Based Solution From Indonesia Akhmad Kamil Rizani
El-Mashlahah Vol 10, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/maslahah.v10i2.2063

ABSTRACTInheritance in Islam is known as the Faraidh, the science that regulates the distribution of inheritance. The distribution of inheritance given to heirs in the process it can take be without dispute or with dispute. Settlement of inheritance disputes is common, but it is different in the case of a family that has differences in religious beliefs. One of the barrier factors of inheritance in Islam is different religions, namely the existence of religious differences between the heir from and the inheritor. Settlement of disputes with the concept of deliberation is believed to be able to solve problems that tend to occur in the era of this century. The purpose of this research is to provide solutions to the problems of heirs of different religions so that the implementation of inheritance can be resolved without a dispute. This research method used descriptive-qualitative method, the writer will trace and analyze deliberations as an alternative to resolving disputes of diffrent religions. The results of this research is deliberations can be used as an alternative solution to the resolution of disputes between different religions by prioritizing the public good.Keywords: Islamic inheritance, Deliberation, and Difference in Religion.INTISARIKewarisan Islam dikenal dengan istilah Ilmu Faraidh, yaitu ilmu yang mengatur tentang pembagian harta waris. Pembagian harta warisan yang diberikan kepada ahli waris dalam prosesnya dapat berlangsung tanpa sengketa atau dengan sengketa. Penyelesaian sengketa waris banyak terjadi, namun beda halnya dengan kasus sebuah keluarga yang memiliki perbedaan dalam keyakinan keagamaan. Salah satu faktor penghalang kewarisan dalam Islam ialah berbeda agama, yaitu adanya perbedaan agama yang menjadi kepercayaan antara orang yang mewarisi dengan orang yang mewariskan. Penyelesaian sengketa dengan konsep musyawarah diyakini mampu menyelesaikan masalah yang cenderung terjadi di era abad ini. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memberikan solusi terhadap permasalahan ahli waris yang berbeda agama sehingga pelaksanaan waris dapat diselesaikan tanpa adanya sengketa. Metode penelitian ini adalah menggunakan metode deskriptif-kualitatif. Dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif-kualitatif, penulis akan melakukan pelacakan dan analisis terhadap musyawarah sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa beda agama. Hasil penelitian ini adalah musyawarah dapat digunakan sebagai sebuah solusi alternatif penyelesaian sengketa waris beda agama dengan mengedepankan kemaslahatan umum.Kata Kunci: Waris Islam, Musyawarah dan Beda Agama.

Optimizing Mediation as An Effort to Settle Marital Disputes in Court Akhmad Kamil Rizani; Muchimah, Muchimah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Vol 8 No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61394/jihtb.v8i2.266

This study discusses the Optimization of Mediation in the Resolution of Marriage Disputes in Court. Marriage is an essential event in human life as a legal and religious act. Along the household's journey as husband and wife, it is not uncommon for differences of opinion or principles between husband and wife to occur, which end up threatening the integrity of a marriage. Mediation as one of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is seen as a humanist and equitable way of resolving disputes. Humanist because the decision-making mechanism (peace agreement) is the authority of the parties to the dispute and maintains good relations. Fair because each party negotiates options for resolving the problem. Divorce cases in religious courts are first required to be mediated; Mediation is carried out to resolve problems to reconcile the husband and wife. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach that focuses on optimizing Mediation in the Resolution of Marriage Disputes in Court. The result of this study is that the optimization of Mediation in court cannot be separated in several ways, namely the Supreme Court, as part of law enforcement, which issued PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court, is the right step in resolving disputes, especially marital disputes. In addition, the role of competent mediators, cooperative parties, and reasonable legal culture. Keywords : Optimization, Mediation, Marriage Dispute

The Politics of Disability Law in Indonesia: Transformation to Strengthen the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Akhmad Kamil Rizani; Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi; Pelu, Ibnu Elmi Acmad Slamat; Tarantang, Jefry; Muchimah; Farhana, Nyimas Tasya
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): October
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2024.14.2.246-280

This article discusses the legal politics of legal transformation for persons with disabilities in Indonesia. The Indonesian nation has always recognized and guaranteed respect for human dignity, including persons with disabilities. This can be seen in Law No. 4 of 1997 on Persons with Disabilities, which explains the government's efforts to protect the rights of persons with disabilities by focusing on rehabilitation, providing social assistance, and maintaining social welfare. However, the text content in the law still adheres to a charity-based paradigm, so it has not been able to handle and ensure equal opportunities for persons with disabilities. The method used in this research is normative juridical with primary legal materials Law No. 19 of 2011 concerning the Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Law No. 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities through a legislative and historical approach. The results of this study show that the legal politics of the formation of Law No. 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities shows the realization of participatory democracy. The transformation of the law changes the paradigm from charity-based to human rights-based, which better guarantees the protection, promotion, and enforcement of the rights of persons with disabilities. Public education on the rights of persons with disabilities, the development of disability-friendly infrastructure, and increased participation of persons with disabilities in decision-making are important for implementation.

Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Alat Perlindungan Hukum: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, Dan Singapura Akhmad Kamil Rizani; Ahmad Dakhoir; Aris Sunandar Suradilaga; Muhammad Aulia Rahman
Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam: Inpress
Publisher : Family Law Study Program, Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/as.v7i1.53218

This study aims to analyze and compare the regulation of marital agreements as instruments of legal protection within the family law systems of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The study departs from the transformation of the classical Islamic law concept of taklik talak into modern positive legal constructions that accommodate the need to protect the rights and obligations of spouses. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials consist of statutory regulations, classical and contemporary fiqh doctrines, academic literature, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study show that in Indonesia, the regulation of marriage agreements is contained in Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, and Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, characterized by increased flexibility following a Constitutional Court decision allowing agreements to be concluded after the marriage has taken place. In Malaysia, the regulation is more systematically structured under the Akta Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1984, which positions taklik as an integral component of Islamic family law administration. Meanwhile, in Singapore, the regulation falls within the framework of the Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966, which institutionally integrates Sharia principles into the national legal system. Comparatively, the three countries share similarities in recognizing marital agreements as preventive instruments of legal protection, yet they differ in terms of formation procedures, validation mechanisms, and binding force. The study concludes that the effectiveness of marital agreements is significantly influenced by each country’s normative design and institutional legal structure. Therefore, strengthening regulatory frameworks and harmonizing legal protection principles based on justice and legal certainty are urgent necessities for the development of Islamic family law in Southeast Asia.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search